The decline and further decline of Re... Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » The Attic (1999-2002) » Soapbox » Archive through September 6, 2003 » The decline and further decline of Republican presidential thought « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

montagnard
Citizen
Username: Montagnard

Post Number: 46
Registered: 6-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - 10:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The following lines are from Dwight Eisenhower's 2nd Inaugural Address in 1957:

"We recognize and accept our own deep involvement in the destiny of men everywhere. We are accordingly pledged to honor, and to strive to fortify, the authority of the United Nations. For in that body rests the best hope of our age for the assertion of that law by which all nations may live in dignity.

"And, beyond this general resolve, we are called to act a responsible role in the world's great concerns or conflicts--whether they touch upon the affairs of a vast region, the fate of an island in the Pacific, or the use of a canal in the Middle East. Only in respecting the hopes and cultures of others will we practice the equality of all nations. Only as we show willingness and wisdom in giving counsel--in receiving counsel--and in sharing burdens, will we wisely perform the work of peace.

These are wise words from someone who knew what war was about, unlike the movie actor or the national guardsman that never heard a shot fired in anger.

http://www.polsci.ucsb.edu/projects/presproject/idgrant/site/inaugurals.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael
Citizen
Username: Michael

Post Number: 362
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 2, 2003 - 10:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Note to the above auther. 2003 not 1957 not same UN and also see 9/11.

Yeah. Another snoozer thread started.

(Yawn)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

montagnard
Citizen
Username: Montagnard

Post Number: 47
Registered: 6-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 3, 2003 - 12:19 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The preceding year saw the Soviet Union invade Hungary, and the Israelis (with the help of Britain and France) invade Egypt.

Common wisdom has it that Britain was deterred from further action in Suez by Kruschev's threat to use nuclear wepaons; Egypt was a Soviet client state at the time.

The French had 400,000 troops in Algeria fighting against FLN terrorists, who by that time had killed over 7000 people.

The U.S. was deploying nuclear weapons in the Pacific, following the confrontation with China the previous year over islands in the Strait of Taiwan.

Very different times.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bottomline
Citizen
Username: Bottomline

Post Number: 6
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Wednesday, September 3, 2003 - 9:31 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Note to Michael: 2003 not 1957, not same Republicans, see reference above to Hollywood actor and National Guardsman.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration