Local Gov't Budget Review - Yes or No... Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » The Attic (1999-2002) » Maplewood Reval » Local Gov't Budget Review - Yes or No? « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through February 15, 2001OctofoilMelidere20 2-15-01  10:48 am
Archive through February 15, 2001JemNjjoseph20 2-15-01  1:42 pm
Archive through February 16, 2001TownieOctofoil20 2-16-01  12:18 am
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Melidere
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 12:20 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

But now that I've figured it out....look out! (grins)
again
Spring is comin!!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Octofoil
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 12:23 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Octofoil is a device that dates back to the 15th century when it was customary for each son to have an individual mark of distinction. Under the rules of heraldry there are eight foils or positions. Heraldic rules gave the OCTOFOIL to the ninth son, a device symbolic of his being surrounded by eight brothers.

The 9th Infantry Division insignia is a red and blue Octofoil.

octofoil
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Melidere
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 12:29 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Cool.
and there is nothing more beautiful than Maplewood in the Springtime.

mine
nite all.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 8:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

uh oh.

secret's out. :)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mem
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 12:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Meli - You are soooo right. Springtime is why I stay in the Northeast, and Maplewood is tops.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Beach
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 1:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It really makes me wonder why people like Townie are so opposed to having someone in to "review". Now I'm tempted to go in and see what little old me can dig up. Could it be something worse than packing up the Beverly Hillbillies truck and takin' off?? Hmmmmm....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Njjoseph
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 2:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I can tell you, Beach, why I'm opposed to it, and Townie probably has some similar reasons, and more!

The state, which really knows nothing about Maplewood will review our books and will make recommendations about our finances. This will include cost-cutting measures (most significantly), and probably some ways the state feels we could improve on efficiency.

However, not really understanding what makes out town unique, the recommendations will be pretty general, and we could all come up with the same recommendations (we have, already -- just read this board!). But it may not be in the best interest of our town to do so. Remember the recent murder in our town, and the Richmond Ave. folks wanting more police surveillance? Well, they don't have enough police to do it now, so do you think they will if we cut $100K off the police budget? Does this $100K even sound like a lot to you? Well, your portion, on average, is less than $15/year.

Let's not improve the traffic situation on Midland Blvd to save another $100K. Just don't complain that someone hit you at one of the many dangerous intersections as you were trying to cross over Midland.

Let's reduce the number of students per teacher, but how do we do that if we reduce the education budget by $500K? We're already risking losing the music program. Same with the tutoring program! What about the art classes and the theatre productions? Then the newspaper and yearbooks.

When Trenton reviews our books and our taxes stay high, won't we be complaining when the TC doesn't implement those recommendations? Won't we be complaining moreso when they do?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Euclidean
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 2:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If Maplewood and S.O. merged, wouldn't we save some money? One police chief, one fire chief, one full-time tax assessor. We are already joined at the most important place - the school district.

We could then have a contest to rename ourselves. MapleOrange or Southwood or MSO or even something creative.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 2:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Euclidean - Your suggestion goes in the category of "Back to the Future", since M and SO did used to be one town, the Township of South Orange. The Village of South Orange split from the Township back in [????], and the Township was renamed Maplewood. The single school district is actually a remnant from the time this was a single municipality.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Euclidean
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 2:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That's interesting! What is the history of the split?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 3:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'm afraid I don't know all of the history. Maybe it had something to do with a tax reval back then ...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Octofoil
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 3:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Njjoseph,

Those are some pretty bizarre assumptions you're making. You, nor anyone else, knows exactly what any consultant is going to tell you. That is, unless you know some thing(s) that the rest of us don't know about the TC and its dealings.

A priori knowledge of what makes M'wood unique is simply not necessary for this type of assignment. In fact, possession of such knowledge or inclinations toward a particular point of view is more often a detriment to objectivity. It is far more desirable to come in fresh with no pre-conceived notions about anything. (And don't go mixing apples and oranges by comparing this type of engagement with the CV type of thing.)

You are correct, there may (emphasize "may") be some risk to the TC. Selective implementation of recommendations may require some explaining. But maybe that's not a bad thing either. Requiring explaining, that is. And of course, on the other hand, if the TC does implement a recommendation and the results are not what the township wants or likes, then the TC can say, "they told us to do it"!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Yvette
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 5:14 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I had heard that the original town split into two because it became to big/overcroweded for one town to handle....I guess for that time period...true, I don't know.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jem
Posted on Friday, February 16, 2001 - 5:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think it had more to do with services not being provided, specifically having something to do with the gas lights. I had once thought that Maplewood had foolishly removed its gas lights, but it turns out, at least as far as I remember being told, that there never were gas lights in Maplewood. Can anyone confirm this?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Soda
Posted on Saturday, February 17, 2001 - 10:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

South Orange town fathers allegedly had gas lamps intalled as a protest of Thomas Edison's decision to locate his now-famous labs in WEST Orange rather than S.O.. Evidently, Maplewood was not in the running...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mtierney
Posted on Saturday, February 17, 2001 - 11:50 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Back in the '80s the village of South Orange as it was then known took steps to change its name to the Township of the Village of South Orange. Seems like townships (such as Maplewood) were eligible for some sort of state monies while villages were not. Thus the change. At the time, the South Orange feared it would lose its quaintness. Money always talks however. Most people don't even notice this delineation.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration