Author |
Message |
   
Nohero
Citizen Username: Nohero
Post Number: 2692 Registered: 10-1999

| Posted on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 10:37 am: |    |
Question: What tax-hiking, government-expanding, latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freak-a-zoid-who-belongs-in-Vermont wrote the following? quote:In the wake of the September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorist attacks on the United States, the U.S. Government declared a global war on terrorism (GWOT). The nature and parameters of that war, however, remain frustratingly unclear. The administration has postulated a multiplicity of enemies, including rogue states; weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proliferators; terrorist organizations of global, regional, and national scope; and terrorism itself. It also seems to have conflated them into a monolithic threat, and in so doing has subordinated strategic clarity to the moral clarity it strives for in foreign policy and may have set the United States on a course of open-ended and gratuitous conflict with states and nonstate entities that pose no serious threat to the United States. Of particular concern has been the conflation of al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as a single, undifferentiated terrorist threat. This was a strategic error of the first order because it ignored critical differences between the two in character, threat level, and susceptibility to U.S. deterrence and military action. The result has been an unnecessary preventive war of choice against a deterred Iraq that has created a new front in the Middle East for Islamic terrorism and diverted attention and resources away from securing the American homeland against further assault by an undeterrable al-Qaeda. The war against Iraq was not integral to the GWOT, but rather a detour from it. Additionally, most of the GWOT’s declared objectives, which include the destruction of al-Qaeda and other transnational terrorist organizations, the transformation of Iraq into a prosperous, stable democracy, the democratization of the rest of the autocratic Middle East, the eradication of terrorism as a means of irregular warfare, and the (forcible, if necessary) termination of WMD proliferation to real and potential enemies worldwide, are unrealistic and condemn the United States to a hopeless quest for absolute security. As such, the GWOT’s goals are also politically, fiscally, and militarily unsustainable. Accordingly, the GWOT must be recalibrated to conform to concrete U.S. security interests and the limits of American power.
The answer is at this link right here.
|
   
Insite
Citizen Username: Insite
Post Number: 191 Registered: 10-2002
| Posted on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 10:51 am: |    |
I think Nohero needs a new job. He has way to much time on his hands. |
   
mfpark
Citizen Username: Mfpark
Post Number: 154 Registered: 9-2001
| Posted on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 11:42 am: |    |
Ah, he's just another commie academic. He used to work for such avowed lefties as Lloyd Bentson, Sam Nunn, Gary Hart (the loonie left), and William Cohen. |
   
mfpark
Citizen Username: Mfpark
Post Number: 156 Registered: 9-2001
| Posted on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 11:54 am: |    |
The author of the article, that is--I have no idea who Nohero used to work for. |
   
bobk
Supporter Username: Bobk
Post Number: 4272 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 12:23 pm: |    |
Mao Tse Tung??  |
   
tom
Citizen Username: Tom
Post Number: 1760 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Monday, January 12, 2004 - 1:52 pm: |    |
He must be one of those commies in the U.S. Army that McCarthy was after. |
   
Ainsworth Hunt
Citizen Username: Ainsworth
Post Number: 164 Registered: 1-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:16 am: |    |
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5507.htm |
|