What does this mean? Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox: All Politics » Archive through August 12, 2006 » Archive through February 24, 2006 » What does this mean? « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Supporter
Username: Themp

Post Number: 2584
Registered: 12-2001


Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 9:31 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
http://mediamatters.org/items/200602220007
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave

Post Number: 8738
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 9:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
By that argument I think he's calling for people to leave their jobs at Fox.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Supporter
Username: Nohero

Post Number: 5083
Registered: 10-1999


Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 9:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
Themp - It means that Rep. Jean Schmidt is gonna open up her can of whoop-••• on Bill O'Reilly.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 4394
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 10:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
Quote:

O'Reilly then claimed that the "big mistake" was actually "the crazy-people underestimation."

is just a nice way of saying, "those liberals were right about the bad planning.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Supporter
Username: Themp

Post Number: 2585
Registered: 12-2001


Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 10:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
Someone recently told me I was right "by accident" in thinking Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. I was kind of surprised to find all of my research and agonizing hadn't help me find the truth. Maybe Murtha was right "by accident" too when he said Iraq was entering civil war.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Montagnard
Citizen
Username: Montagnard

Post Number: 1893
Registered: 6-2003


Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 10:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
War is peace, my friend, and we're currently at peace with Iraq and always have been. Sounds like you encountered one of the easily manipluated.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Innisowen
Citizen
Username: Innisowen

Post Number: 1584
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 11:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)
O'Reilly has about as much credibility in his field as GWB has in his.

Last night he was actually trying to say that the US should not rethink its decision to hand over port operations to Dubai WP because the act would insult an ally.

OK.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration