Author |
Message |
   
Foj
Citizen Username: Foger
Post Number: 1338 Registered: 9-2004
| Posted on Saturday, May 13, 2006 - 2:31 am: |
|
Gingrich on NSA Phone Records Program: Administration’s Conduct Can’t ‘Be Defended By Reasonable People’ The disclosure of the NSA’s domestic call-tracking program has drawn criticism from some of Bush’s key allies: House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH): “I am concerned about what I read with regard to NSA databases of phone calls.” Rep. Deborah Pryce (R-OH): “While I support aggressively tracking al-Qaida, the administration needs to answer some tough questions about the protection of our civil liberties.” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): “The idea of collecting millions or thousands of phone numbers, how does that fit into following the enemy?” Last night on Fox, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich added his name to the growing list of bipartisan critics of the program. Watch it: I don’t think the way they’ve handled this can be defended by reasonable people. It is sloppy. It is contradictory, and frankly for normal Americans, it makes no sense to listen to these three totally different explanations. Full transcript below: GINGRICH: Good to be with you, Alan. COLMES: Here’s what the president said in April of 2004 about the whole issue of wiretapping and warrants. Here’s what he said then. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BUSH: Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires — a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we’re talking about chasing down terrorists, we’re talking about getting a court order before we do so. (END VIDEO CLIP) COLMES: Then he said when it came out a little while ago that there was some wiretapping he said it only applies to international communications. And now we’re finding something else. So it just seems we’re not getting a consistent story here, are we? GINGRICH: No. You’re not. COLMES: Why not? GINGRICH: Look, I’m not — Alan, I’m not going to defend the indefensible. The Bush administration has an obligation to level with the American people. And I’m prepared to defend a very aggressive anti-terrorist campaign, and I’m prepared to defend the idea that the government ought to know who’s making the calls, as long as that information is only used against terrorists, and as long as the Congress knows that it’s underway. But I don’t think the way they’ve handled this can be defended by reasonable people. It is sloppy. It is contradictory, and frankly for normal Americans, it makes no sense to listen to these three totally different explanations video: http://images1.americanprogress.org/il80web20037/ThinkProgress/2006/ging.320.240 .mov
|
   
Duncan
Supporter Username: Duncanrogers
Post Number: 6337 Registered: 12-2001

| Posted on Saturday, May 13, 2006 - 10:47 am: |
|
That may be the first time I have agreed with the Newt since he crawled back under his rock. |
   
Foj
Citizen Username: Foger
Post Number: 1347 Registered: 9-2004
| Posted on Saturday, May 13, 2006 - 6:14 pm: |
|
I would suggest he goes back to the rock.......... |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3261 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Sunday, May 14, 2006 - 10:14 pm: |
|
I agree. The guy is no dummy, but he had his turn in the limelight and blew it. It's interesting to see guys of his experience speaking out against this administration, but it's odd the way he phrases things. He's "prepared to defend" or "not prepared to defend"... who cares? What kind of defending does he think he can do that has the slightest relevance at this point? |
   
Straw Kennedy
Supporter Username: Strawberry
Post Number: 7206 Registered: 10-2001

| Posted on Sunday, May 14, 2006 - 10:48 pm: |
|
well for starters he may be running for President. He's certainly going to be considered a V.P. candidate if a moderate such as McCain gets the nomination. It's part of the reason he's throwing some of these type of comments out there.. I've been saying for 2 years the 08 tix could very well be McCain/Newt... Powerful .... |
   
Eats Shoots & Leaves
Citizen Username: Mfpark
Post Number: 3347 Registered: 9-2001

| Posted on Monday, May 15, 2006 - 10:06 am: |
|
Makes sense, Straw. McCain sure veered to the right last week when he kissed Falwell's ring in public. And Newt has been making nice with Hilary in public, and now critiquing Bush (however mildly). Having Newt as his wingman is consistent. (please hold the "wingnut" comments my dear fellow libs). |
|