Archive through May 19, 2006 Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox: All Politics » Archive through August 12, 2006 » Archive through June 4, 2006 » IRAQ: What now, Bushies? » Archive through May 19, 2006 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Prenovost
Citizen
Username: Chris_prenovost

Post Number: 949
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 7:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Iraqi middle class is leaving. In droves.

The people upon whom any democracy is built have lost faith in their own country. Due entirely to the extraordinary ineptitude of President Bush.

We have occupied that country for years. And in that time, we have sucessfully accomplished what many thought was impossible. We have made a bad situation worse.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/19/world/middleeast/19migration.html?hp&ex=114809 7600&en=27cafcfc5a99f506&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Presidents can be impeached for malfeasance, does anyone know if they can be tried for gross incompetence? And does anyone wonder why this man's public opinion polls are in the basement?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7231
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 7:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Easy to answer..Hopefully the submitted cabinet is approved by Parliament. We continue stepping back allowing the Iraqis to assume control. All we can do now. If they cannot Govern and protect their democracy our mission will not work.

Really, not much more you can do. One has to hope that the terrorist activity in Iraq subsides or is defeated due in part to the Iraqi forces..

It's now in the hands of the Iraqi Government so you need to rename this thread, "Iraq/what now Iraqis?"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tjohn
Supporter
Username: Tjohn

Post Number: 4338
Registered: 12-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

In other words, mission accomplished. If things fail now, its the fault of the Iraqis - a brilliant display of Bush think.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7232
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:28 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tjohn,

For a smart guy that was one pointless post. More Llama and Tjohn.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1375
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:35 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I hate to tell you this Straw but what you are calling 'terrorist activity' is civil war. These arent hidden criminals fighting each other, they are Iraqis trying to fill a power void. No puppet, America approved constitution is going to stop this.

Iraq is becoming the new Lebanon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tjohn
Supporter
Username: Tjohn

Post Number: 4340
Registered: 12-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Bush says that we are fighting in Iraq to establish a democratic government. If that does not happen, it represents a catastrophic failure of our policy. And we cannot blame anybody but the Bush Administration for this failure. Certainly we cannot blame the Iraqis.

Unfortunately, being secure in the knowledge that the Bush Administration will earn its place in history as the worst American presidency will be scant comfort as we live through the hangover of his administration.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob K
Supporter
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 11570
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:44 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't think Straw read the article. A couple of the people who are leaving specifically mentioned that the government offered no protection. Iraq is going to be in even more trouble than it already is if the educated middle class moves to Jordan and Syria.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 2105
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:48 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

when our plan is now "we have to hope..." we're in deep .
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

3ringale
Citizen
Username: Threeringale

Post Number: 206
Registered: 1-2006
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 8:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hoops is exactly right. For the sake of argument you could say that the Sunni resistance was just a bunch of "dead-enders", etc. But with the emergence of Shi'ite militias since last summer, the handwriting is on the wall, and it says "Civil War". Partitioning the country into 3 parts would probably work eventually, but there would be a high cost to pay in ethnic cleansing, etc.
The former Reagan NSA head William Odom said that invading Iraq was arguably "the greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history." I don't think he is far off the mark.
Cheers
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7233
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

hoops is exactly wrong...Terrorists are trying and so far unsuccessful in launching a civil war.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

The Notorious S.L.K.
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows

Post Number: 1433
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Straw-

Why bother with this? The Bush Haters keeping asking all these silly questions when we all know they think we shouldn't be there in the first place.

Everything else is moot.

In my world, it is better to try and fail then never trying at all.

-SLK
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1378
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:44 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hoops is right, Hoops is wrong.

I'm neither right nor wrong. The American policy in Iraq is wrong and thats right.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

The Notorious S.L.K.
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows

Post Number: 1435
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:46 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hoops-

I am glad you made this post. So, what should the policy in Iraq be?

-SLK
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Supporter
Username: Nohero

Post Number: 5413
Registered: 10-1999


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"In my world, it is better to try and fail then never trying at all."

Sure, that's a good general rule.

I am also partial to "Look before you leap." And its corollary, "I suppose if everyone else was going to jump off a bridge, you'd do that, too?"

With respect to Iraq, the Administration decided to "jump off the bridge".

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1379
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 9:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SLK-

"In my world, it is better to try and fail then never trying at all. "

Really? All the killing, all the destruction, all the lost money, all the lost American lives. But it was ok to try this idea?

outrageous.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ae35unit
Citizen
Username: Ae35unit

Post Number: 72
Registered: 2-2006


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 10:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Why bother with this? The Bush Haters keeping asking all these silly questions when we all know they think we shouldn't be there in the first place"

Aren't comments like this starting to get a little delusional and shameless? The right wing shill media can pretend all they want, but that's one heck of a scary article.

This piece may have it's problems, but it's a pretty nice summary of why we need to protect America, from ourselves as much as anybody else. I for one feel that the posters and their sympathizers who dismiss anyone who disagrees with the current administration as a unwashed leftist, and who think that our current policies, like building a 370 million dollar distraction on the Mexican border or "staying the course" in Iraq makes sense, are aiding and abetting in doing great harm to America. Anyway, take a look:

http://www.kabc.com/mcintyre/listingsEntry.asp?ID=432586&PT=McIntyre+in+the+Morn ing
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 3168
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 10:20 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Terrorists are trying and so far unsuccessful in launching a civil war."

On what do you base this piece of information? What leads you to know that terrorists are trying to start a civil war? I don't mean your personal assessment. What facts do you have?

You claim someone else is wrong. Yet you simply make statements without backing them up with anything.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7234
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 10:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's pretty obvious. What do you think the terrorists are doing? Trying to stablize the Government?

Of course they want Civil War..Almost as badly as American radicals libs do..

This is why they target the women and children and police officers. This is why they target family members of those in power..This is why they target Mosques..

Shiite vs Sunni vs Kurd..Now that would be a terrorist dream come true..

So far, despite their best efforts it has not come to this but in time it may..We may see that nation divided into 3. For the sake of peace, let's hope that's not the case but if need be, I can live with it and so can you.



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 3172
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 10:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Nice inflammatory claim... "Of course they want Civil War..Almost as badly as American radicals libs do.. "

One more time, do you have any evidence to back up your claim that a civil war is being fomented by terrorists?

But let's assume it's true. Would you say we have some responsibility to prevent that from happening?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7235
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 10:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"One more time, do you have any evidence to back up your claim that a civil war is being fomented by terrorists?" -Yes, From Kissenger to Wesley Clarke this is clearly the primary motive of the terrorist in Iraq.

"But let's assume it's true. Would you say we have some responsibility to prevent that from happening?"-No, Iraqis must work together to stop this. We are not responsible for Iraq in the long term. We removed their dangerous dictator and gave them the keys to democracy. Our work in this regard is done. Now, all we can do is support their efforts.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 3174
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:04 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

We created the situation that they are in. Your response is child-like, and several months ago you would have called it "cut and run" had it been proposed by a Liberal.

We caused the problems they are having now, and you are simply saying it is not our responsibility.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

llama
Citizen
Username: Llama

Post Number: 774
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Of course they want Civil War..Almost as badly as American radicals libs do.. "

Strawbury once again proveing himself wrong, a true hypocrite because now he wants to "cut and run." Way behind in his ability to reason. I do appreciate the impact I have had on him by his mentioning me in his post, though.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7236
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:29 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"We caused the problems they are having now, and you are simply saying it is not our responsibility."

not true, actually I feel like when I need to explain things to you, I have to do so slowly...

We have nothing to do with generations of hate between the three main tribes in Iraq. We had nothing to do with their dictator making billions off the UN. We declared war and we removed that dicator..Anything above and beyond is done so out of respect for the people of Iraq. If these same people cannot govern themselves there is nothing we can do. We are certainly not going to send 300,000 troops to Iraq which I suppose is going to be the new lib line.."Not less war, more war, we're libs!"

Another reason why libs are morons.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ae35unit
Citizen
Username: Ae35unit

Post Number: 73
Registered: 2-2006


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:29 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Childlike, shameless, delusional, treasonous. Straw's been reading "A--holes for Dummies" again.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Prenovost
Citizen
Username: Chris_prenovost

Post Number: 951
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:44 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Straw, rarely have you been so wrong so often in such little time and so little space.

There were no 'generations of hate'. Read your history, if you can. The three ethnic groups in what is today Iraq got along fine. First under the Ottoman Turks, then under the British. Then your boy Bush came along.

Saddam did not 'make billions off the UN'. He successfully defrauded the oil-for-food program. Effectively, stealing his own country's money. Please get your facts straight.

And we NEVER declared was on Iraq. Unless the National Review wrote something I missed.

Turn off Rush Limbaugh and all the other useful idiots and make up your own mind.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Supporter
Username: Themp

Post Number: 2921
Registered: 12-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/05/18/watch-us-soldiers-lazy-_n_21272.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 3177
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

First, I am not a lib. So if you want to call me a moron, you'll have to make it personal.

Second, where in the long list of reasons we went into Iraq was "remove saddam?" I thought we were looking for WMDs (that, according to Rumsfled, we knew the locations of). OH wait, I thought we were beinging democracy ot the middle east. Remember, freedom is on the march.

We fsck up a stable (though admittedly unjust) country, and you actually have the nerve to say

Quote:

"Anything above and beyond is done so out of respect for the people of Iraq. If these same people cannot govern themselves there is nothing we can do."




I really don't think I have heard a stupider comment here on MOL, and that says a lot. I don't even imagine BUSH could say something stupider.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 4945
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


Quote:

We have nothing to do with generations of hate between the three main tribes in Iraq. We had nothing to do with their dictator making billions off the UN. We declared war and we removed that dicator.*


The problem is, that dictator was the one thing standing between the three tribes. Like Tito in Yugoslavia, whatever his abuses and crimes, he kept full-blown civil war from breaking out. We've removed him, but haven't put anything into place to serve that important function.

"Terrorist," like "socialist," is rapidly becoming a word that obscures more than it informs. Terrorism is a tactic. The Boston Tea Party was a terrorist act. We praise it because it was staged against a repressive government by a faction which we support. John Brown's raids were terrorist, and they are still controversial to this day. To some, he's a freedom fighter of the highest order; to others a dangerous radical. But to call him a mere terrorist raises more questions than it answers.
________________________________
* as an aside, the billions from the U.N. are not relevant to this point; and we never declared war.}
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7237
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 11:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"There were no 'generations of hate'. Read your history, if you can. The three ethnic groups in what is today Iraq got along fine. First under the Ottoman Turks, then under the British. Then your boy Bush came along. "

right, I suppose you also believe in the easter bunny..

I mean do any of you libs actually know what you're talking about?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bettyd
Citizen
Username: Badjtdso

Post Number: 255
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I can't believe some people are still clinging to this dream of a free, democratic Iraq as we enter our fourth year there. But why do we expect these people to think otherwise by now? Straw, after all, has described our invasion of Iraq and our misguided attempt to set up a democracy at gunpoint amongst religious and ethnic factions that have hated each other for centuries as "pretty basic stuff." When you believe this fiasco is "pretty basic stuff" you are beyond hope.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 3178
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Straw, the person you are quoting is not a "lib."

Chris, I wouldn't say they "got along fine" considering Saddam gassed the Kurds.


Quote:

There are a number of ethnic minority groups in Iraq:Kurds (Muslim and Yezidi), Assyrians, Mandeans, Turkmens and Roma. These groups have not enjoyed equal status with the majority Arab populations throughout Iraq's eighty-five year history. Since the establishment of the "no-fly zones" following the Gulf War, the situation of the Kurds has changed as they have established their own autonomous region. The remainder of these ethnic groups continue to suffer discrimination on religious or ethnic grounds.

The Ba'ath party harshly oppressed minorities during its rule of Iraq. Since the 1977 census, citizens had to answer the question about ethnicity with either "Arab" or not[citation needed]. The Ba'ath party also harshly oppressed the majority of Shia muslims.

Turkmens claim to be the 3rd largest ethnic group in Iraq, numbering a little over 1 million. They reside only in the north. When the Ba'ath party took over Baghdad, it declared in the constitution that schools were prohibited from using the Turkish language and banned Turkish-language media in Iraq. By the 1980s, Hussein prohibited the public use of the Turkish language completely. After the toppling of the Baath party, tensions started to rise between the Kurds and the Turkmens. Assignations and acquisitions between the two sides made Kirkuk the only violent non-Arab city in Iraq during the aftermath of the U.S-led war. The violence has slowly died down and on January 30, 2006, the President of Iraq, Jalal Talabani, said "Kurds are working on a plan to give Turkmens autonomy in areas where they are a majority in the new constitution they're drafting for the Kurdistan Region of Iraq." [7]

Yezidis are ethnically Kurdish, but many of those in Iraq do not see themselves as Kurdish in terms of ethnicity, culture, and religion. This has led to Kurdish authorities forcing Yezidis to register as Kurdish during the 2005 elections. Peshmerga troops have controlled Yezidi areas near Mosul since 2003. A predominant Yezidi politician that spoke out against Kurdish leaders was assassinated in the spring of 2005. Last year, Yezidi representatives complained that the $12 million approved for projects in Yezidi areas in Sinjar had been blocked by the intervention of Kurdish political leaders in Mosul and instead was used for a smaller Kurdish village.

Iraq's Kurds overwhelmingly favor becoming an independent nation. "In the January 2005 Iraqi elections, 98.7 percent of Kurds voted for full independence rather than reconciliation with Arab Iraq."[8] Almost no other political or social group in the region is agreeable to the idea of Kurdish independence. Iraq's neighboring countries are particularly opposed to the movement because they fear that an independent Iraqi Kurdistan would enkindle Kurdish independence movements in their own territories.

The Kurds and other non-Arabs living in the North were subjected to Iraq's worst instance of minority persecution in 1987-89, in what is now referred to as the al-Anfal Campaign. Anywhere from 100,000 to 182,000 were massacred in a genocidal offensive mostly in and around the oil-rich city of Kirkuk, and elsewhere in Iraqi Kurdistan.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 4947
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A patently obvious "generations of hate" situation, and yet Bush & Co. thought the factions would strew the streets with flowers before us. No wonder conservatives are in a frenzy over the floral AK-47 on Flood's Hill -- it reminds them of what fools they were.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ae35unit
Citizen
Username: Ae35unit

Post Number: 74
Registered: 2-2006


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"When you believe this fiasco is "pretty basic stuff" you are beyond hope."

"I really don't think I have heard a stupider comment here on MOL, and that says a lot."

That does say a lot. Straw, dude, you're sounding just plain stupid today. Go back to bed or better yet, read the link I posted in the middle of the thread and atone for your dumbness.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Supporter
Username: Themp

Post Number: 2922
Registered: 12-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://harpers.org/sb-cia-badnews-293480283.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lucy Smith
Citizen
Username: Lucy123

Post Number: 158
Registered: 6-2005
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

ae35unit-that is a great link! Thanks!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Straw Kennedy
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 7238
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's pretty funny that this thread has once again turned into a lib dialogue.

This is lib dialogue.

say there is a problem but offer no alternatives. Offer no solutions, just take the should of, could of, would of route.. A non lib then tells you what SHOULD BE DONE. Libs, reaction of course is to attack anyone who offers a solution.


Not one of you moronic libs has stated WHAT WE SHOULD DO IN IRAQ..

Do we pull out?, do we add another 200,000 troops?, do we continue supporting the Government??

I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer..

libs are morons.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bettyd
Citizen
Username: Badjtdso

Post Number: 256
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 12:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Boring.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 2108
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 1:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 4950
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 1:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Amusing. Straw's first post on this thread reads in part, with emphasis added

Quote:

We continue stepping back allowing the Iraqis to assume control. All we can do now ...

Really, not much more you can do. One has to hope that the terrorist activity in Iraq subsides or is defeated due in part to the Iraqi forces.




Bold solutions there, Straw.

Listen, we've all got better things to do than bone up on years of raw intelligence, interview personnel on the ground, build up our own intelligence networks in Iraq, monitor signal intelligence, and everything else that would go into developing a solution. We have people we pay to do this for us: the CIA, the Defense Department, and the State Department.

My solution? Boot the current crop of imbeciles -- who make their decisions and then cherry-pick the facts -- out of there, and put in honest people who will look at the facts first and only then make the proper decisions.

There's a reason The Emperor's New Clothes continues to be a popular story -- it's a timeless reflection of basic human nature. And this war is a classic example of how it plays out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Prenovost
Citizen
Username: Chris_prenovost

Post Number: 952
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Friday, May 19, 2006 - 2:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Actually, Straw raises a good point. Now that the incompetent, lying, bufoonish draft-dodging cowards have gotten us into this quagmire, how do we get out? Forget about two years from now with a new administration. What do we do now?

Get out immediately?

Phased withdrawl?

Stay the course, which is essentially Vietnamization redux- train the Iraqis to take over, leave and hope for the best - which did not work in Vietnam?

Escalate, send in more troops, and suppress the insurgency/terrorism/incipient civil war?

Or what?




Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration