| Author |
Message |
    
Foj
Citizen
Username: Foger
Post Number: 1546
Registered: 9-2004
| | Posted on Wednesday, June 21, 2006 - 10:37 pm: | 
|
 
Ewwwww, yuck, cough, spit. |
notehead
Supporter
Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3480
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 9:50 am: |
|
Sure she does. She just doesn't have a heart. |
Factvsfiction
Citizen
Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 735
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:21 am: |
|
Smarmy extreme liberal humor at it again?
Bet you live for the "Colbert Report" and Stuart Smiley on Air America too, Foj. They are just so hip and 'with it" politically.
It's kinda predictable if you have a fixed left mindset.
Frankly I would love to see MOL overrun with anarchists. They have a sense of humor and can enjoy a good drink when they are not busy trying to tear down the institutions of government.
Anne Coulter?
Any press is good press for her. And she relies on the left to keep her meager celebrity alive.
I am sure she would thank you for feeding the machine guys. |
S.L.K. 2.0
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows
Post Number: 1758
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 12:21 pm: |
|
All those with Adam Apples beware. FOJ will be sending out the death squads shortly....hide under your beds...
Pick on Anne Coulter's looks all you want. But when you have fine specimins such as:
or this:
you really don't have a leg to stand on.
OMG, I think I am the first male in human history to ever lose an erection without even having one to begin with.... 
-SLK
|
The3ofUs
Citizen
Username: The3ofus
Post Number: 20
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 12:31 pm: |
|
SLK, beauty comes from within. Unfortunately for Ms. Coulter, her lack of inner beauty ruins her outer "beauty". And fortunately, for Ms. Albright and Ms. Reno, their inner beauty helps make them easier to swallow in the looks department.
You can't compare the three...Coulter is the only one of them using her inner ugliness solely to play her game and make money. That is bad karma. Albright and Reno aren't fundamentally evil. |
3ringale
Citizen
Username: Threeringale
Post Number: 257
Registered: 1-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 12:48 pm: |
|
Albright isn't fundamentally evil?
Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.
--60 Minutes (5/12/96)
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1084
This article errs in calling her Secretary of State when she was still UN Ambassador, but she is still evil.
Cheers
|
The3ofUs
Citizen
Username: The3ofus
Post Number: 21
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 12:55 pm: |
|
No, she was supporting her administration, right or wrong...you know, the same way republicans support Bush. But Coulter is an evil prick. |
S.L.K. 2.0
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows
Post Number: 1760
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 12:58 pm: |
|
How can a woman be an evil prick? And why is Coulter evil? For saying what is on her mind?
Whether you agree with her or not is a different issue.
-SLK |
ae35unit
Citizen
Username: Ae35unit
Post Number: 117
Registered: 2-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 1:28 pm: |
|
 in ten years will be 
Now, who is Straw masquerading as?
|
The3ofUs
Citizen
Username: The3ofus
Post Number: 22
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 1:33 pm: |
|
(Sound of subtle jab at Coulter's adam's apple going over SLK's head)
SLK, she is evil for not only saying what is on her mind but HOW she says what is on her mind. I don't even consider what she says and whether I agree or not...her voice and delivery are enough to tell me that she is evil and repulsive. |
S.L.K. 2.0
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows
Post Number: 1761
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 2:49 pm: |
|
T3OU-
She is evil because she doesn't pamper her words and how she delivers them?
I humbly disagree. If more people spoke as honestly as she does the world would be a better place and much more would get done.
-SLK |
Robert Livingston
Citizen
Username: Rob_livingston
Post Number: 1958
Registered: 7-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 2:52 pm: |
|
She's a whore.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is a delusional Bush-loving nutcase. |
S.L.K. 2.0
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows
Post Number: 1763
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 2:54 pm: |
|
RL,
Right, right...of course....
(bite your tounge about kinky wife, SLK)
-SLK |
The3ofUs
Citizen
Username: The3ofus
Post Number: 24
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 2:56 pm: |
|
Exactly SLK...she is evil because she delights in her vile delivery. Karma is a boomerang. |
Robert Livingston
Citizen
Username: Rob_livingston
Post Number: 1960
Registered: 7-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 3:02 pm: |
|
Man, you just can't get past that, scrod. I'm certain I know why. Man, I feel sorry for you. |
Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops
Post Number: 1535
Registered: 10-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 3:11 pm: |
|
I dont think she is evil. I think she has emotional problems, maybe she didnt get hugged enough as a kid or maybe she was in an abusive family. Whatever, she is extremely hostile towards those that do not agree with her and her quotes are inflammatory and cruel.
assorted ann coulter quotes |
Bob K
Supporter
Username: Bobk
Post Number: 11913
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 3:16 pm: |
|
I wonder how she handles this issue?
/discus/messages/3127/119235.html?1150744203 |
Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3427
Registered: 5-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 3:32 pm: |
|
SLK, while I don't think she is evil, rendering one's opinion can make one appear evil. If I stood on a corner and shouted that I believe all Jews should be wiped from the Earth, that they are evil and the children of Satan, that they are responsible for everything bad that has happened to the US in the past 20 years, killed Jesus, slaughter children for their blood to make matzoh, and on and on. And my intention was to either a)convince people that Jews really are everything I said or b)profit from spreading that hate, would you agree that was pretty evil?
In other threads, you've said of anti-conservative comments, what if you replaced conservative with Black. Well, would you opinion of Coulter change if her book claimed (and tried to convince readers) that Jews were godless? |
Factvsfiction
Citizen
Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 745
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 6:02 pm: |
|
Rastro-
Can you get blood matzah at Kings? Given some excessive bar mitzvahs I have gone to, a compelling argument could be made that Jews are now g-dless, or at least religion has been replaced by food selections.  . Joking, of course.
Has the reval company come to your house yet? Haven't seem you lurking in the property values threads.
Personally I think most single guys of a certain age would find Coulter attractive. On the other hand, if you put a wig on Stuart Smiley it would seem Hoops and Livingston would find him attractive, politically I mean (hope).
She is absolutely like Howard Stern people, say what you want but spell my name right. And IMHO, you are playing into her, because a person or two might actually but her book after reading this thread.
|
dave23
Citizen
Username: Dave23
Post Number: 1842
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 9:52 pm: |
|
SLK,
S/he does pamper his/her words. S/he chooses them very carefully in order to produce Maximum Outrage and increase book sales. |
S.L.K. 2.0
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows
Post Number: 1769
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 9:54 pm: |
|
dave23-
If she pampered her words then they wouldn't cause so much outrage. I would say she is strategic with her words.
-SLK |
Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops
Post Number: 1536
Registered: 10-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:03 pm: |
|
Lets describe a certain female -
bitches and sisters |
Foj
Citizen
Username: Foger
Post Number: 1550
Registered: 9-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:04 pm: |
|
"I love this"....... I just had to rip off Southerner.
Um FVF, who is Stuart Smiley? And I dont have cable or SatTV.
Again you get it backwards............ I'll wait, somewhat patiently for your next try. Yawn. |
Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops
Post Number: 1537
Registered: 10-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:06 pm: |
|
Foj, Stuart Smiley is one of Al Frankens characters. |
Factvsfiction
Citizen
Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 753
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:16 pm: |
|
Foj-
I would be out inspecting those voting machines if you are bored.
Plus, could you tell Joe D. that instead of focusing on spending my money on parks I don't use, I would prefer he spent his time getting rid of the deadwood and patronage people working for the County to save us a buck or two?
Many thanks.
Say, how come you never responded about Cindy Sheehan's seeming anti-semetism? Winning-elections-at-any cost-for-democrats got your tongue? |
Foj
Citizen
Username: Foger
Post Number: 1553
Registered: 9-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:35 pm: |
|
FVF.... are you refering to Muriel Shores barbershop scandal from last year?
AND please provide a cite on your so called Cindy Story. I would prefer the transcript, not some dreamed up Rove talking points.
Hoops, thanks, Oh yeah...Franken is the guy from SNL, with the Very Dry sense of Humor. And he is on AAR. |
SO Ref
Citizen
Username: So_refugee
Post Number: 1920
Registered: 2-2005
| | Posted on Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 10:36 pm: |
|
Her Adam's Apple is there to divert attention away from her penis. |
3ringale
Citizen
Username: Threeringale
Post Number: 258
Registered: 1-2006
| | Posted on Friday, June 23, 2006 - 6:30 am: |
|
A little perspective:
Meaningful Lives
by Charley Reese
Ann Coulter, to use one of her favorite words, is an over-40 smart "broad" who makes a ton of money out of being controversial. She laughs all the way from her Palm Beach, Fla., mansion to the bank when Democrats and liberals get outraged by something she says or writes.
A former corporate lawyer, she's a regular on Fox News and collects big fees for speaking engagements. She's at the height of her fame. In a way, she's the Republican equivalent of Michael Moore, who, despite his costume of working man's clothes, also lives in a mansion. If you play your cards right, you can get rich being a polemicist for the poor or a polemicist for the rich.
Calling some of the 9/11 widows harpies and witches who enjoy their husband's deaths is no more tasteless and cruel than many of the other things Coulter has said or written. She is, after all, a verbal exhibitionist. The fallacy of her vituperation is that the widows did not choose to become celebrities. The media chose them. And who is surprised that people from New York City and the New Jersey suburbs are liberals? Most people who live there are.
The prize for the dumbest remarks, however, goes to Sandy Rios, described as a Fox News contributor, who said that just because the widows lost their husbands to an accidental bombing "does not give them license to then criticize their commander in chief."
Error No. 1, it was not accidental; error No. 2, it was not a bombing; error No. 3, George W. Bush is not their commander in chief (he's commander in chief only of the armed forces, not of the civilian population); and error No. 4 is that nobody needs a license to criticize any public official. That's the right of every American citizen.
The real question is, Does all of this vituperation and nasty name-calling contribute to anyone's understanding of the issues facing this country? I think not. People who are inclined to substitute vituperation for argument – whether from the left or the right – are people who already have their minds made up and believe either no explanation is necessary or that the truth will collapse their position.
The whole talk phenomenon, which includes television and radio, has more to do with entertainment than with either politics or public enlightenment. One establishes oneself as a "personality" and plays the role. Who knows what these people really think, or if they think at all about the topics they are so bombastic about? I suspect they think mostly about book contracts, book sales and ratings.
Argumentum ad hominem, which is what name-calling is, is a dead giveaway that the person wishes to avoid a rational discussion. We would all do better to ignore the entertainers and concentrate on civil discussions. After all, good people can disagree, and on most issues there are pros and cons. It's all right to skewer your opponent's arguments, but personal attacks only reveal you to be a yahoo.
Of course, there has always been a yahoo element in the population, but at least in the past, most of them did not become rich and famous. We have reached a point in our present culture in which if anybody can make money, it's OK, no matter how the person makes it. That's probably inevitable in a society in which leadership has nothing to offer but materialism.
Materialism is no good as a life's philosophy. In the first place, most of us will not accumulate that many toys, and even those who do have to turn them all in at the cemetery gate. Being acquisitive is a poor substitute for a life with meaning.
I suspect the widows who have been motivated to correct the political errors that led to the 9/11 attacks will have much more meaningful lives than Ann Coulter. Fifteen years from now, nobody will remember Coulter.
June 17, 2006
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese287.html
|
tjohn
Supporter
Username: Tjohn
Post Number: 4421
Registered: 12-2001
| | Posted on Friday, June 23, 2006 - 7:12 am: |
|
3ring - very nice post. |
tulip
Citizen
Username: Braveheart
Post Number: 3575
Registered: 3-2004
| | Posted on Friday, June 23, 2006 - 7:34 am: |
|
3ring, that is a magnificent post. It is certainly the realm of the yahoo to make an argumentum ad hominem, and it certainly signifies that one's views (and probably one's life) is void of meaning. So to, the point about materialism. What a fine statement! |
Southerner
Citizen
Username: Southerner
Post Number: 1171
Registered: 2-2004
| | Posted on Friday, June 23, 2006 - 8:03 am: |
|
Foj states, "I would prefer the transcript, not some dreamed up Rove talking points.". I wish you felt this same way when you post some of your drivel, ie Leopold! I hear Jason Blair is still writing articles, maybe you could cite some of those for us.
|
3ringale
Citizen
Username: Threeringale
Post Number: 259
Registered: 1-2006
| | Posted on Friday, June 23, 2006 - 8:53 am: |
|
tjohn and tulip,
Don't thank me, thank Charley Reese, who almost always tells it like it is. If you have some time to kill, check out some of his columns here: http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese-arch.html
I'm a bit of a yahoo myself, but I do try to avoid the ad hominem stuff.
Cheers |
joel dranove
Citizen
Username: Jdranove
Post Number: 607
Registered: 1-2006
| | Posted on Friday, June 23, 2006 - 10:31 am: |
|
Dame Edna is not a whore, bitch or sister.
Really.
And Malka Albright did run on her pointy shoes after a limo carrying Arafat, once upon a time in Europe, calling out: Wait, wait, I need to talk to you.
He rightfully sped away.
This is true.
jd |
Factvsfiction
Citizen
Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 768
Registered: 4-2006
| | Posted on Saturday, June 24, 2006 - 11:17 pm: |
|
Foj-
Check the internet as to Sheehan's comments about Israel and Jews, (real simple).
Nice continued avoidance btw on the subject of Sheehan's anti-semetism.
But I guess that is acceptable or to be desired if it advances the great "progressive" movement, which is actually not progressing anywhere.
|
tom
Citizen
Username: Tom
Post Number: 5161
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Saturday, June 24, 2006 - 11:34 pm: |
|
It sends chills down my spine to hear someone in a public position say that "does not give them license to then criticize their commander in chief." To even consider that the president is beyond criticism is to consign democracy to your own personal dustbin of history.
You cannot allow yourself to forget just what a razor's edge our freedoms live on. Don't kid yourself in thinking this guy is alone in his viewpoint. You wouldn't have thought there were people in the military who would torture people or murder children, either. |
Foj
Citizen
Username: Foger
Post Number: 1576
Registered: 9-2004
| | Posted on Saturday, June 24, 2006 - 11:43 pm: |
|
"does not give them license to then criticize their commander in chief."
This, from Coulter is an examlpe of the faulted thinking so prevailient... Bush is the commander in chief of the Military, not the country, or those wives/widows.
FvF, thanks for the invite. |
tom
Citizen
Username: Tom
Post Number: 5162
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Saturday, June 24, 2006 - 11:48 pm: |
|
It's more than faulty, it's verges on totalitarian. I'm serious; in what other kinds of countries are you not permitted to criticize the leader? |
S.L.K. 2.0
Citizen
Username: Scrotisloknows
Post Number: 1793
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 7:03 am: |
|
tom-
criticize all you want, but at least have legitimate criticisms. "Bush lied" doesn't cut it...
ANother problem is your criticism is unbalanced.
-SLK |
3ringale
Citizen
Username: Threeringale
Post Number: 263
Registered: 1-2006
| | Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 8:46 am: |
|
tom and Foj,
The quote "does not give them license to then criticize their commander in chief." is from the article I posted by Charley Reese. Ann Coulter did not say it. It is from someone named Sandy Rios, who works for Fox Snooze. In any event, it is a remarkably dumb statement.
Cheers
|
tom
Citizen
Username: Tom
Post Number: 5164
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 12:30 pm: |
|
3ringale, I never said Coulter did; but as you say, in any event it is remarkable.
SLK: by what should it be balanced? Anyway, "Bush lied" is legitimate. He decided on war, pretended he hadn't, went through the motions of diplomacy, and manipulated the intelligence to support his case. |
Southerner
Citizen
Username: Southerner
Post Number: 1181
Registered: 2-2004
| | Posted on Sunday, June 25, 2006 - 5:38 pm: |
|
I love this. |
Closed: New threads not accepted on this page