Federal Spending Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox: All Politics » Archive through August 12, 2006 » Archive through July 14, 2006 » Federal Spending « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spinal Tap
Citizen
Username: Spinaltap11

Post Number: 29
Registered: 5-2006


Posted on Monday, July 10, 2006 - 8:23 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My first foray into starting a thread:

http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed070306a.cfm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Foj
Citizen
Username: Foger

Post Number: 1635
Registered: 9-2004
Posted on Monday, July 10, 2006 - 11:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Lets see... Deficit..

440 billion

Money taken from Social Security trust fund..

280 billion

Cost of Iraq occupation...

100 billion/anum

720 billion more dollars spent than taken in.


Anyone care to print some more money......
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spinal Tap
Citizen
Username: Spinaltap11

Post Number: 30
Registered: 5-2006


Posted on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 - 7:43 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Unfortunately, neither party is willing to do anything. My favorite paragraph:

What have our elected officials done to address this impending crisis? Absolutely nothing. Every year reform is delayed, 77 million baby boomers move a year closer to retirement, and total reform costs increase by about $1 trillion. Timid politicians fear voters will punish anyone who courageously tries to reform these popular programs. So liberal lawmakers pretend the Social Security Trust Fund will pay all benefits until 2040 (lawmakers already spent every cent of it), and conservative lawmakers pretend that tax revenues from a growing economy can fund these costs (not even close). The bipartisan consensus: Ignore the problem and let the next generation deal with it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MichaelaM
Citizen
Username: Mayquene

Post Number: 196
Registered: 1-2004


Posted on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 - 11:58 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Problem is: How do you sell something as unsexy as Social Security change? Especially since young adults vote less than any other age bracket?

As cliche as calling the program the "third rail" of politics, the cliche exists for a reason.

But nevermind Social Security. Medicare is even a bigger financial drain in the long run. I believe that at some point we'll have to create a universal healthcare system simply to have people paying in who are low cost.

I'm not saying we shouldn't have these programs, but making them viable in the long term is a case where politics makes good policy hard to attain.

I love this stuff. :-)

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration