Author |
Message |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3741 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 9:29 am: |
|
I'm no reflexive France-hater, but what the hell is their game? They're only willing to commit 200 troops to help preserve the cease fire in Lebanon? That is totally unacceptable, especially in light of their demands for a major role when negotiations were going on. Are they simply waiting for clearer terms to be agreed to before making a greater commitment, or are they truly unwilling to provide manpower for an issue that they seemed to think quite recently was terribly urgent? Indonesia is ready to provide 1000 troops (although they will only go to Lebanon). Italy has offered 3000. Looks to me like France is really dropping the ball here. |
   
Bob K
Supporter Username: Bobk
Post Number: 12472 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 9:39 am: |
|
I have heard/read two explanations: 1. There was a disconnect between the Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of Defense. The military, remembering the bombing back in the 1980s don't want to send troops so it seems. 2. Syria, reminded France of the before mentioned bombings and indicated it could happen again, thereby scaring the bejus out of the Chirac government. Israel has also indicated that they will not accept troops from countries they don't have diplomatic relations with, ruling out most Muslim countries, probably including Indonesia.
|
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3743 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 9:48 am: |
|
Well, letting previous actions and/or threats of similar actions by governments comprised of lawless cretins scare you is hardly a justification for failing to commit manpower to an important, even noble, undertaking like this peacekeeping effort. I hope they come up with a more compelling reason than that -- or simply grow a pair. |
   
cjc
Citizen Username: Cjc
Post Number: 5823 Registered: 8-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 10:52 am: |
|
They're French. |
   
tjohn
Supporter Username: Tjohn
Post Number: 4736 Registered: 12-2001

| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 10:57 am: |
|
Nobody wants to shoulder the costs. Countries like Italy or France should be committing a heavy division each. The Indonesians, meanwhile, will be toasting marshmallows on the exhaust of 122 mm rockets. This is not a cease-fire. It is intermission during which time, Hezbollah will try to rearm as much as they can and the Israelis will figure out how to do it right when fighting resumes. |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3748 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 11:07 am: |
|
Yes, I doubt that the Indonesians are particularly concerned about protecting Israelis. One has to wonder if the Indonesians would in fact guard the lines re-arming Hezbollah, rather than focusing on keeping the peace. |
   
Chris Prenovost
Citizen Username: Chris_prenovost
Post Number: 1045 Registered: 7-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 11:11 am: |
|
France's foreign policy rests on two pillars: 1-) Anti-Americanism, and 2-) Anti-semitism. Anything they do is viewed through the prism of those two pillars. Their government is truly reflective of the French people: Spineless, vacillating, utterly cynical pseudo-intellectuals who think they know everything. |
   
tom
Citizen Username: Tom
Post Number: 5610 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 11:40 am: |
|
Anti-semitism has been a serious problem in France for a long time, and despite the national embarrassments the Dreyfus affair and the Vichy government caused hasn't necessarily gotten any better. But I think what we see as anti-Americanism is really a defensive nationalism that has to prove its independence by being anti-something, and as the local hyperpower we're that something else. But the single issue that drives conservatives' dislike of France these days is that they opposed the Iraq war, and the fact that they were right only makes it worse. |
   
Reader
Citizen Username: Reader
Post Number: 5 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 12:29 pm: |
|
This is not a cease-fire. It is intermission during which time, Hezbollah will try to rearm as much as they can and the Israelis will figure out how to do it right when fighting resumes. What Tjohn said. |
   
Innisowen
Citizen Username: Innisowen
Post Number: 2277 Registered: 3-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 12:30 pm: |
|
Somewhere in all this is an old quote from Einstein, about his research and theories. "If I am right, the honors will flow in to me: the French will call me a Jew, and the Germans will call me a German. If I am wrong, the French will call me a German, and the Germans will call me a Jew." Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. |
   
joso
Citizen Username: Joso
Post Number: 341 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 3:59 pm: |
|
It is certainly strange the way the French have backed out their seeming commitment, but we were the co-authors of the agreement, and we are providing no troops Even if we had them, I think it is unlikely we would commit them there given our past history. Why shouldn't the French be skittish?
|
   
cjc
Citizen Username: Cjc
Post Number: 5825 Registered: 8-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 4:16 pm: |
|
joso -- do you really think Lebanon and more importantly Hezbollah would have gone along with an agreement that puts US troops there? tom -- feelings of conservatives towards France go way beyond your 'single issue.' |
   
joel dranove
Citizen Username: Jdranove
Post Number: 930 Registered: 1-2006
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 4:23 pm: |
|
I think, ergo sum. But, how can our State Department, Ms. Rice, VP, the Pres., with all their knowledge and experience (for what that is worth), not have a more concrete and irrevocable commitment? I think it was amateur hour here. Innisowen quotes correctly. jd |
   
argon_smythe
Citizen Username: Argon_smythe
Post Number: 906 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 6:02 pm: |
|
...I'd like a large order of freedom fries with my burger please...
|
   
Factvsfiction
Citizen Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 1496 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 8:16 pm: |
|
The U.S. should ask Jerry Lewis to intervene with French authorities. So France has.... anti-semitism.... but the U.S.... doesn't?  |
   
Innisowen
Citizen Username: Innisowen
Post Number: 2280 Registered: 3-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 8:29 pm: |
|
Why invoke Jerry Lewis when we already have our own nutty professor and master of pratfalls living in the White House? |
   
Lord Pabulum
Citizen Username: Lord_pabulum
Post Number: 58 Registered: 7-2006

| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 9:27 pm: |
|
There is nothing wrong with Jerry, however how long can you speak to a French or Israeli person with out being spat on, by mistake? Allah praise them. |
   
Spinal Tap
Citizen Username: Spinaltap11
Post Number: 185 Registered: 5-2006

| Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 9:40 pm: |
|
Not that I'm a defender of France or anything but there is one more pillar with regard to the U.S. and the Middle East. The fact that we screwed them along with the UK and Israel at the Suez in 1956. |
   
Hoops
Citizen Username: Hoops
Post Number: 1969 Registered: 10-2004

| Posted on Thursday, August 24, 2006 - 3:48 pm: |
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060824/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_peacekeepers France pledged 2000 troops. |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3757 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Thursday, August 24, 2006 - 4:43 pm: |
|
That's a little more like it. Now let's see what those troops actually do. |
   
dave23
Citizen Username: Dave23
Post Number: 1974 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Thursday, August 24, 2006 - 5:00 pm: |
|
Everyone gets up in arms, but has to be prodded to act on it. Like when Rice announced that the US would provide $50 million to Lebanon in the wake of the bombings, people lamented that it was too cheap. After international pressure, we are giving $270 million. |