Cheney-Edwards Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox: All Politics » Archive through October 5, 2004 » Cheney-Edwards « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page        

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mark Fuhrman
Citizen
Username: Mfpark

Post Number: 679
Registered: 9-2001


Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 8:31 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What do you expect from this debate? It has taken higher prominence after the first Kerry-Bush debate. If Cheney continues to behave like Bush did, then it will really hurt his ticket. (Note that Bush started sneering and scowling like Cheney does--4 years of learning from the puppet master). If Edwards looks lost against Cheney's experience, then it will stall Kerry's momentum.

The format favors Cheney (sitting at a table). Edwards is usually not as good sitting as he is moving around, he is best playing the crowd like it was a jury.

Cheney has to make Edwards look like a 5-year senator with no clue. Edwards has to make Cheney look like an out-of-touch inflexible hawk with no clue. It is a toss-up which one will best succeed.

I expect Edwards to quote from Cheney's own statements about why Bush the Elder did not try to topple Saddam in the Gulf War. Cheney will counter that 9/11 changed everything, and Edwards will remind Cheney that Saddam did not attack America. On domestic issues, Edwards should whip Cheney--if he doesn't, Kerry is in trouble at the next presidential debate.

To quote a famous political sage, this next debate is all about the Big Mo. My prediction: Cheney keeps his cool, but he looks flat and uninspiring while Edwards holds his own and does not hurt Kerry.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bobk
Citizen
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 6254
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 8:38 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mr. Nice vs. Mr. Nasty. :-)

I rather expect that Cheney will, other than a few put downs, ignore Edwards and repeat all the points President Bush failed to make in his debate with Senator Kerry.

If Edwards manages to get under Cheney's skin (as a trial lawyer he should be good at this) and Cheney loses his temper it should be interesting. Howver, I doubt this will happen.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Livingston
Citizen
Username: Rob_livingston

Post Number: 164
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 10:48 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Cheney will be conducting the debate from an undisclosed location.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Citizen
Username: Themp

Post Number: 1005
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 11:20 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"I rather expect that Cheney will, other than a few put downs, ignore Edwards and repeat all the points President Bush failed to make in his debate with Senator Kerry. "

Yeah, he'll slip right by Edwards, I think. He won't debate anything, and won't take any bait. That's how he beat Lieberman. He'll go after Kerry, not Edwards. He'll cop an attitude like - "hey, I set aside a little time for this because you seemed interested in my opinions, but don't assume I care what you think."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

DrFalomar
Citizen
Username: Drfalomar

Post Number: 327
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 11:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Republicans have made trial lawyers into public enemy #1 because they want to protect corporate interests. If Cheney tries to frame Edwards as one of their usual lot, Edwards will remind America that trial lawyers like himself are often most folks' only defense against rapacious and corrupt corporations, for which Cheney is a magnificent symbol.

If I could ask any one question, it would be, If you are for gay marriage, as you've state, and as the father of a lesbian, how can you support a President in his discrimatory legislation against gay marriage?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

jjkatz
Citizen
Username: Jjkatz

Post Number: 264
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 11:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'll be watching the Yankee game.

Cheney, no doubt, will do what Cheney does best -- lie through his teeth and do it in such a matter-of-fact way that he'll come off as credible. Edwards will have to be on his toes.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

DrFalomar
Citizen
Username: Drfalomar

Post Number: 328
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 12:02 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

JJ

Good point. I would bet Edwards is being drilled in all the rejoinders and corretions that Kerry couldn't get in on Thursday. For example, on Bush and the number of troops actually trained. All these things will be brought up and keep Cheney on the defensive.

I agree that Cheney is lucky to be sitting down. A fat man like him will never be elected to the White House ever again, and the table will hide his rotundity.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Robert Livingston
Citizen
Username: Rob_livingston

Post Number: 169
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 12:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Face it, whoever isn't watching the playoffs will judge this debate on appearances. No toss up there. It will be like Nixon vs JFK.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Madden 11
Citizen
Username: Madden_11

Post Number: 394
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 1:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

How's this for a line in response to the trial lawyer smear?

Edwards: "I would remind Mr. Cheney that if it weren't for trial lawyers, he wouldn't be Vice-President."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

LilLB
Citizen
Username: Lillb

Post Number: 215
Registered: 10-2002


Posted on Monday, October 4, 2004 - 1:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If Edwards wasn't a trial lawyer, I would say that Cheney would chew him up and spit him out, but trial lawyers have mastered the art of the arguing a point, so I think Edwards will hold his own in this one.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration