Sexist Sportcasters Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox » Archive through March 15, 2006 » Sexist Sportcasters « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Purplebug
Citizen
Username: Purplebug

Post Number: 70
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 4:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What the hell. I am an avid tennis fan and the newscasters/sportcasters are driving me up a wall with their love of male tennis. Roger Federer this, Roger Federer that. And don't get me wrong, I like his game and his personality. But isn't where a great upset about the lack of depth in men's tennnis?!?!! Whenever a woman consistently won tennis mathes, the sportcasters were belly aching about a lack of depth in talent. About how it is really boring for the same person to keep winning. I don't hear any of this crap with Federer. Now that Mauresmo has broken through (well-kinda); I don't think that one woman has won all the majors. YET NO COMMENT!!! COCK- roaches
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Grrrrrrrrrrr
Citizen
Username: Oldsctls67

Post Number: 307
Registered: 11-2002


Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 4:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Martina Hingis said once that Mauresmo was mostly man anyway...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ligeti
Citizen
Username: Ligeti

Post Number: 597
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 4:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Most of the attention is well-deserved: Federer is on track to match Sampras's 14 slams, and plays an elegant, full-court game in the style of Rod Laver. Even though I personally prefer to watch womens' tennis, I don't think there is anyone on the landscape right now that we can reasonably expect to equal the achievements of Court, King, Martina (N.), Evert and Graff.

Mens' tennis has been so boring and one-dimensional until recently: atomic first serves and powe slugging from the baseline. Points are over in 2 or 3 strokes. It's really refreshing to see someone with a net game win the big tournaments. It's been awhile....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ess
Citizen
Username: Ess

Post Number: 1228
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 5:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I actually read the title of this thread as "Sexiest Sportscasters", and was interested to see who was mentioned.

Otherwise, yes, it does seem that men's tennis gets most of the attention. Even the prize money is higher (though some might argue it's justified since men must play more sets). However, in general, men's tennis is a lot more powerful and, I think, more fun to watch. I was getting tired of the Williams sisters, frankly.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Earlster
Supporter
Username: Earlster

Post Number: 1467
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 9:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I didn't know there was womens tennis, Navratilowa, the Williams 'sisters', they all have more muscles and wider shouldes then most men.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration