"Little Bratz Babies?!?" Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox » Archive through June 26, 2006 » "Little Bratz Babies?!?" « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MeAndTheBoys
Citizen
Username: Meandtheboys

Post Number: 3996
Registered: 12-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 8:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Holy crap. These "Babies" look like little "ho's" with CFM make-up, "bedroom eyes" and full, pouty lips. Just saw a commercial and it scared the you-know-what out of me.

What do moms of girls do?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hank Zona
Supporter
Username: Hankzona

Post Number: 5714
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

some of them buy the matching outfits for their daughters...others just say no.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ess
Citizen
Username: Ess

Post Number: 2242
Registered: 11-2001


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My daughter was into the Bratz dolls a couple of years ago. Nothing she had was too suggestive or ho-esque, although the make-up was a bit much. Haven't seen the new Bratz babies or any recent iterations of the dolles, though.

Ultimately, I think she found them a bit creepy (to change the shoes, the entire leg comes off) and abandoned them in favor of American Girl dolls (a more costly habit) and Jesse McCartney.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1475
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:22 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

LOL

Bratz babyz -

http://www.mgae.com/2004_product_pages/products/BratzBabyz/BratzBabyz.asp
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Project 37
Citizen
Username: Project37

Post Number: 116
Registered: 3-2006


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

How 'bout this?

http://www.pimpfants.com/

(Yes, it's for real.)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Soparents
Citizen
Username: Soparents

Post Number: 1031
Registered: 5-2005


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:37 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I let my daughters pretty much have the toys of their choice when we go toy shopping, but Bratz? nope.... no no no nooooooo

They look deformed with those big heads, and who ever taught them about makeup?

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

kmk
Supporter
Username: Kmk

Post Number: 1286
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:41 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Three daughters in this house....no Bratz.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Virtual It Girl
Citizen
Username: Shh

Post Number: 4609
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 9:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

We have a few, they were gifts. I wouldn't buy them (but my eldest insists I never buy them toys.)

I guess I'm raising 'ho's in training.

Really, I agree they are hideous and scary looking, but my girls are big on imaginary play and just use them the way they use any other doll, creating characters and putting them in different scenarios.

So what if those scenarios include after-hours clubs and ecstasy induced sexcapades.


(BTW, That was totally tongue in cheek)

What difference are they than some of the boys' toys like different weapons, transformers, etc? I really don't think my 8 or 4 year old is going to start asking to dress like her bratz doll.

Sometimes I just don't sweat the small stuff.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zoesky1
Citizen
Username: Zoesky1

Post Number: 1560
Registered: 6-2003


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 10:10 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Two daughters, ages 6 and 4, in the house, but holding off on Bratz. I hate those things. My girls know they are not allowed to get Bratz dolls, but they play with them at friends' houses. And i did give in once and allow them to get a Bratz playground ball, because it was fairly benign. But they know that is the closest they're getting to owning one of those hideous things. When they asked why they weren't allowed to get Bratz dolls, I simply told them they were inappropriate and left it at that....and they seemed to get the idea. I allow Barbies, but I draw the line at Bratz.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lydia
Supporter
Username: Lydial

Post Number: 1970
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 10:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I agree w/ Virtual It Gal,

I have daughters, one of them has Bratz, she also has Groovy Girls, barbies, Ugli dolls - they all live together in one big basket and she plays with them all together.

Yeah, the big heads are funny looking, but so was Blythe - remember the '70's? Dawn was pretty big-headed too.

What I do find unsettling is that some posters describe these dolls as "ho's" - what exactly is a "ho-looking" doll?

Do "ho dolls" have pimps? Carry switchblades? What?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MeAndTheBoys
Citizen
Username: Meandtheboys

Post Number: 3997
Registered: 12-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 10:18 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I get your point, VIG. But boy, are those dolls kind of frightening.

Boys and weapons have a been around forever and, like you, I don't sweat the small stuff. But it certainly seems that when my guys were really small, before anyone else bought them any kind of play weaponry (because I generally don't), they were making guns out of their toast.

But there certainly wasn't anything like Bratz when I was a girl. I had a Malibu Skipper (you know, the one with the California tan), and that was about as crazy as it got.

And I really wonder about girls not "dressing like Bratz dolls." Seems like I see some girls (perhaps a bit older, but not always) who come very close sometimes.

I saw a teenage girl in the park yesterday, probably about 15 or 16, and her low-rise pants were so low I could practically see her uterus. As it was her little blue panties where peeking out. Aside from that fact, they were just terribly unflattering, as she didn't really have the figure to pull-off that low rise. And she had some conglomeration of horrific pink, sparkly eyeshadow all over her face. I guess I must be an old fart, because I said to myself "if she were my daughter, she wouldn't leave the house looking like that!"
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

mjc
Citizen
Username: Mjc

Post Number: 1193
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 10:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

meand - "making guns out of their toast" brings it all back! Our thought at the time was that anything longer than it was wide was immediately a gun. And this at a time when they were way pre-K and not watching any of "that kind of stuff" on TV. Where does it come from??
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ess
Citizen
Username: Ess

Post Number: 2243
Registered: 11-2001


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 11:03 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Way back when I was a kid, I had a Skipper doll that unfortunately developed breasts when the arms were raised. In retrospect - WTF????

I'm not apologetic about the Bratz dolls, just as I am not apologetic about the Barbie dolls I tried to ban. They were fun at the time, and they were used just as any other doll/toy for imaginary play.

I am way more concerned about guns and violent toys at this point. It seems as though the potentially suggestive toys are a thing of the past (and fortunately, before they could have an impact on my daughter, who is now 9) but the toys for boys - guns, swords, and the like - are everywhere. Even when my son gets a weapon as a gift, it is given away.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

joy
Citizen
Username: Joy

Post Number: 480
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 11:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

No ho dolls in my house. My nieces wanted them for Xmas one year - no ho dolls from me - let some other Aunt spend the $.

Barbies made it into the house to my chagrin. I view them as a lesser of two evils.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lizziecat
Citizen
Username: Lizziecat

Post Number: 1274
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 11:56 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I had sons and we never allowed them to have toy guns. So they made them out of legos. Or they pointed their fingers and said "Bang, I'm shooting you dead." Or they played with guns at their friends' houses. At least we were true to our own principles and didn't buy guns.

Now I have granddaughters. They don't have Bratz, as far as I know. They do have Barbies, and I must say I get a secret satisfaction from seeing the way that the Barbies are carelessly tossed around, ignored and then forgotten.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1478
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 12:11 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

thats it. I am now scarred for life. buzzsaw you have clearly crossed the line. Dave - buzzsaw should be banned for this obscenity.




editted to say Sorry - 'Nevermind'
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

buzzsaw
Citizen
Username: Buzzsaw


Post Number: 5025
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 12:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I took it down. It was in bad taste.
The dolls do look like they have had really bad plastic surgery.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1479
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 12:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I thought it was funny tho. Just extremely gross.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Pippi
Supporter
Username: Pippi

Post Number: 2344
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 12:19 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I always think Buzzsaw is funny and brilliant, so I am sorry I missed it. Whatever he said, I am sure I would have agreed


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hoops
Citizen
Username: Hoops

Post Number: 1481
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 12:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It was a visual comparison between a Bratz doll and an actual plastic surgery gone bad. It really does seem like the person tried to look like the doll.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Virtual It Girl
Citizen
Username: Shh

Post Number: 4613
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 1:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

No wonder my mother-in-law looks like a Bratz Doll!




Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro


Post Number: 3379
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 1:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

This shirt is worth the embarrassment of peeing in my pants at work.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

doulamomma
Citizen
Username: Doulamomma

Post Number: 1560
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 2:25 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

yikes!

hey, Meand...my oldest made a toast gine once - as I've noted (possibly here) before, I made myself feel better by feeling happy that it was a whole wheat gun
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

doulamomma
Citizen
Username: Doulamomma

Post Number: 1561
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 2:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hey Meand, my oldest made a toast gun once & as I have probably said here before, I made myself feel better by noting that it was at least a whole wheat gun!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lydia
Supporter
Username: Lydial

Post Number: 1971
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, June 15, 2006 - 2:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Rastro,

Love the shirt!!!

Celebrate your little darlin's Oedipal complex with the world!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

doulamomma
Citizen
Username: Doulamomma

Post Number: 1563
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Friday, June 16, 2006 - 8:50 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

oops - above was an example of a post I thought I had mistakenly deleated but obviously had not...maybe JB can do a list about double posts instead of deleated ones!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lydia
Supporter
Username: Lydial

Post Number: 1973
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, June 16, 2006 - 1:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

If "Barbie" was magically changed into a real woman, I read somewhere she'd be 6 feet tall with 4 foot-long legs and size 3 shoes wearing 6" heels. Yikes!

My objection to describing "Bratz" dolls as "ho's" isn't that they aren't weird looking dolls, but the word "ho" carries a value judgment of the dolls' morality (!) based on cosmetics and clothing, and not too far behind, their dark skin.

If these were white-skin-colored dolls with caucasian features with the same clothing would they be called "ho's"? I doubt it, inappropriate perhaps, even "slutty". The word "ho" is so demeaning and much more harmful for our daughters and sons to hear than any weird little doll is.

Ugly language with sexist/racist connotations are more powerful and potentially damaging to a child than any toys are IMO.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glock 17
Citizen
Username: Glock17

Post Number: 1135
Registered: 7-2005


Posted on Friday, June 16, 2006 - 1:27 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Some of them are "white-skin-colored". They are just faux tanned as is the style for many young white-skin-colored girls of today.Part of this stems from a desire to not seem very "white". "Oh I'm 1/8th Dominican and I'm also Russian, and my friend is black so I guess I'm part Black." Why is this occuring? Don't know.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lydia
Supporter
Username: Lydial

Post Number: 1974
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, June 16, 2006 - 2:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Glock -

Possibly, re: faux tan, but the doll's features are not "caucasian" in the way that Barbie's are.

The Barbie line has some dark-skinned dolls, but they still have button noses and small lips like the white/tan Barbies do.

The first dark-skinned Barbies that I recall were the "Malibu" Barbies - making it clear that their dark skin was due to the sun and not genetics. That may be over-analyzing it - but I grew up in the '70's when a "Julia" doll was a big deal.

Anyhow, my point is mostly that women have fought for a long time to dress or wear their makeup however they want to. When anyone refers to a woman as a "ho" it perpetuates harmful sexual stereotypes that should be rejected once and for all.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cynicalgirl
Citizen
Username: Cynicalgirl

Post Number: 2873
Registered: 9-2003


Posted on Saturday, June 17, 2006 - 12:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Agree with Lydia. Welcome to the '50's redux. Personally, I can't bring myself to pronounce the word "ho." If I need to, I say "slut" instead. My kid has some Bratz a few years ago, much as she had those Kelly dolls I tended to call Jon Benet Barbies (not much for kid beauty pageants as I am, and I'm sure that's not PC either). It passed, and didn't influence her clothing preferences any. Or her behavior.

At the same time, seems a little something -ist to assume darker skin correlates with certain feature sets. African, Indian and Carribean people have all kinda looks. As do Europeans. Wiry hair, or not. Some small noses, some not. Ditto lips (I say this as a person with a rather large, un-WASP mouth). It's all pretty silly, and few of us of any racial cocktail fall into categories neatly, at the polar extremes.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SO Ref
Citizen
Username: So_refugee

Post Number: 1905
Registered: 2-2005


Posted on Saturday, June 17, 2006 - 12:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Not sure about it being PC, but trivializing a little girl's murder is a bit insensitive.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cynicalgirl
Citizen
Username: Cynicalgirl

Post Number: 2874
Registered: 9-2003


Posted on Saturday, June 17, 2006 - 12:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That's what I meant. You're right. It's not very nice, and that wasn't the intention (trivialization of murder). The Kelly's were first making the rounds, in all their beauty pageant glory, about the time such pageants were a hot topic, and then Jon Benet's pix was all over. It stuck. My apologies.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joanne G
Citizen
Username: Joanne

Post Number: 218
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Sunday, June 18, 2006 - 4:07 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Just saw my first Bratz, and I can see what you're all talking about. I don't have kids and most of my friends' kids are in their 20s, so dolls don't usually enter our conversations!!

This neighbour child's mum was telling me frightens her the most is that the feet totally remove at the ankle if you want to change shoes, so you land up with modular 'women' not modular fashion. So the morals of beauty include the continued objectification of body parts, not making the most of what you have and accessorising well. And this is not a well-education, highly philosophising family. H'm. I just shuddered when I saw it - but then I used to love Noddy and thoguht I would marry him or Casey Jones. Come to think of it, maybe I did...!

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration