Author |
Message |
   
sylvester the investor
Citizen Username: Mummish
Post Number: 144 Registered: 6-2004
| Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 10:45 am: |
|
There must be a flaw in their formulas http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2006/states/NJ.html Of the top places to live in NJ: Camden, Irvington, Elizabeth, East Orange & Paterson. Doesn't this basically discredit the validity of the report when Maplewood made the top 100 two years ago? |
   
Spitz
Supporter Username: Doublea
Post Number: 1851 Registered: 3-2003
| Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 10:57 am: |
|
I think this particular Money report ranked cities with populations of at least 50,000. The list which includes Camden, etc. is just a list of all the other cities in N.J. with populations of at least 50,000. |
   
Dave
Supporter Username: Dave
Post Number: 10184 Registered: 4-1997

| Posted on Thursday, July 20, 2006 - 11:02 am: |
|
The population thing makes more sense. Or the editors apparently found there are more bribes to be taken from the pols in those towns. |
   
Joan
Supporter Username: Joancrystal
Post Number: 7817 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Friday, July 21, 2006 - 8:19 pm: |
|
Sylvester: Read the article again. None of the places you mention made the top 100. The five NJ cities which did are listed in the first of the two tables. All of the other cities in NJ including Camden, Irvington, Elizabeth, East Orange & Paterson are listed in the second table under the "Other Cities in New Jersey" heading. |