Archive through September 5, 2006 Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox » Evangelicals » Archive through September 5, 2006 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

notehead
Supporter
Username: Notehead

Post Number: 3797
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 2:09 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Couldn't sleep, so I went online and decided to check out movie trailers on the Apple Quicktime site.

Now I'll never fall asleep! This would be a lot less scary if it was fiction...

http://www.apple.com/trailers/magnolia/jesuscamp/trailer/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5730
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 2:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You know, I really think these people can be reached.

One thing they have in common with we liberals is compassion. And if we can just get the subject off of abortion and school prayer, and onto hunger, healthcare, housing, peace, social justice and all the other things that Jesus himself would be focussing on, they will be pried away from the GOP by the millions.

The GOP's prestidigitation the last twenty-plus years has evangelicals believing that they really are on their side. But the veil is lifting and people are going to see that the values issues the GOP stresses -- and gets absolutely no results on -- are not the ones that are important to real people in the real world anyway.

The Democrats are the next values party -- the values we've stood for since 1933.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Señor Moment ©
Citizen
Username: Howardt

Post Number: 2464
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 8:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oy vay...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

mwoodwalk
Citizen
Username: Mwoodwalk

Post Number: 579
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 9:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Didn't find anything scary about it. I think those of you who do ought to re-examine your own biases and assumptions about the people depicted. For instance, nowhere in that trailer did I see any hateful speech, any bigotry, anything approaching vengefulness---just some passionate outspoken people. I may not choose to send my kids to camps like those depicted, but I don't believe we have anything to fear from those who do.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

notehead
Supporter
Username: Notehead

Post Number: 3799
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 10:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You didn't find anything scary about it? Little kids being driven literally into paroxyms of brainwashed fervor? Being hollered at and intensely guilt-tripped on all sides into dedicating every action they undertake to preparing for the Apocalypse? That doesn't bother you?

I appreciate Tom's point very much, and I think if the increasingly ubiquitous question "WWJD?" is truly the motivation for these folks, well, then they'd have a lot of common ground with liberals. But the way that some of the mothers were talking about needing to prepare a generation to combat the kids being raised in Palestine, etc., gives me a serious and, I think, well-founded case of the willies. What if they decide, as some of their more vocal representatives clearly have, that the greatest threats facing humanity today are the intermixing of races, or homosexuality, or the Jews? I'm going to have to watch the film to see if I can get a better feeling about these folks that the one I got from that trailer.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spinal Tap
Citizen
Username: Spinaltap11

Post Number: 190
Registered: 5-2006


Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 10:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I gotta say that looks pretty nuts but I think they may be depicting the extreme. I have lived all over the country including some very red states and communities. In some of these placed I was friends with several evangelical Christians. Other than periodic proselytizing (at which point I would tell them to knock it off unless I was at their house) you would never have known it. I never saw them flying Christian flags or their kids crying in prayer or convulsing on the ground. I don’t think I ever heard them say an unkind thing about anyone. I think the worst I ever heard them say about anyone was that they would pray for them. On the other hand, in the time I have lived and worked in the New York metro area, I have heard some of the most vitriolic, hateful, things regularly said about evangelical Christians that could never be said about any other group and others just nod in approval.

Yes they are compassionate but they differ sharply with Democrats on solutions to problems. They believe in the power of communities, charity, faith, and their churches – not the power of wealth redistribution and federal bureaucracies. They also view contemporary Liberalism and post-modernism as the root causes of many social problems.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5735
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 10:38 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well that's the thing, I think they don't really have that strong an opinion on local community vs. state vs. federal involvement. I don't think that distrust of the federal government is overwhelmingly strong, especially if it's shown that the feds can share their values. After all, they're willing to support federal-level candidates on abortion. That's necessary because Roe v. Wade made it a federal issue. But other values issues can be positioned the same way.

I don't think that many people of any stripe are really concerned with where the work gets done. The strictest of constructionists will toss federalism out the window in a heartbeat if it helps to ban marijuana or assisted suicide, or limit lawsuits against corporations. Lots of groups pay lip service to federalism, but when push comes to shove they're almost all results-oriented.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Shanabana
Citizen
Username: Shanabana

Post Number: 1109
Registered: 10-2005


Posted on Monday, September 4, 2006 - 10:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My cousins are part of a small but growing movement of evangelicals who have liberal politics. Though I'll never join such an organization (short of a conversion miracle), speaking with them gives me hope that we can all get along and move our country in a truly compassionate direction.

http://www.the-river.org/home.htm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alleygater
Citizen
Username: Alleygater


Post Number: 2582
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 1:00 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Asking a 5 year old if they would give their life for Jesus? And you don't think there was anything wrong with that? DUDE, wake the heck up.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Billy Jack
Citizen
Username: Kendalbill

Post Number: 227
Registered: 6-2002


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 3:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Evangelicals come of many types...I think we have to be careful in how people label others. Broadly, an evangelical is someone who is committed to spreading the word of God. That's it. The New testament calls on Christians to be evangelical. That means "evangelicals" are many (or most) or your neighbors- at least in theory. I hear a whole lot of "they", and I have to wonder why.

Religious conservatives, fundementalists, etc....that is a different issue. This trailer seems to dwell with the extreme, but a mainstream Methodist summer camp or an afternoon at the YMCA wouldn't be very interesting, would it?

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob K
Supporter
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 12567
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 4:26 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A coupled of points:

1. Billy Jack is correct. The term Evangelical is usually miwsused. Every liberals favorite protestant denomination is the United Church of Christ. These are the folks who produced "The Bouncer" commercial a couple of years ago emphasizing their inclusiveness. The ad was part of their "Still Speaking" campaign, which is aimed at bringing people into, or back to, the Christian Community. Their political side is very left wing. They are very pro Palestinian as an example.

2. I think Jewish posters should be aware that the fundementalist churches are very pro-Israel before bringing on the condemnation. A great many mainstream Protestant churches aren't.

3. If you are going to have a country with freedom of religion, you have to be able to accept points of view other than your own. We are free to believe what we want to believe, or not believe at all. Other people have the same rights.





Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cynicalgirl
Citizen
Username: Cynicalgirl

Post Number: 3173
Registered: 9-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:33 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have to agree with Bob K. I've got a few friends who are highly committed, conservative Catholics (not the cultural or cafeteria thing), very literate, educated and philosophically pro-life from conception, stem cell research,and capital punishment, and they are anti-war. Kind of Jesuitical, really. I admire the philosophical thoroughgoingness and consistency of their belief, and the time/money they give in support of single parents, victims of disease, prisoners etc.

I do not share their beliefs, but over the several decades, we've had many discussions on all points. Billy Jack's point about what evangelical means also seems pertinent here. For me, these things all look like a bit of a divide between those who are committed members of a conservative religion that has an authoritarian bent (parts of Catholic, Islamic, Jewish, whatever) v looser, more anti-authoritarian religious practice (of any creed) and agnosticism. Always seems to me odd when some will parse and defend the flavors of Islam but completely freak on more conservative Christian religious practice.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alleygater
Citizen
Username: Alleygater


Post Number: 2587
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 10:00 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't care that there are "nice" flavors of Christians. I care that there were kids under the age of 10 writhing around on the floor possessed by the spirit of Jesus in that film. Creeped me out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10705
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 10:05 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Looks like a Stephen King movie, doesn't it?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ligeti Man Meat
Citizen
Username: Ligeti

Post Number: 795
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 10:13 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

There are some very kind and compassionate evangelicals. But as a movement, they are deeply suspicious and threatened by beliefs and cultures that are not exactly like their own. "Foreigners," for the most part, are just plain weird to them.

"If you're not electing Christians, then in essence, you are going to legislate sin....Separating religion and politics is wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers." Rep. (R-Florida) Katherine Harris

Sure sounds like something an Islamic militant nutcase would say.

Reject born again Christians and their compulsive need to control what others think.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

notehead
Supporter
Username: Notehead

Post Number: 3801
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 10:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alley - exactly.

I'm sure there is a wide range of people who consider themselves evangelicals, but the ones depicted in that trailer seemed to be members of something unhealthy, cultish, and freaky.

I probably should have titled this thread "The Sort Of Evangelicals Depicted In This Particular Movie Trailer Really Freak Me Out" but I was a bit hasty. It's hard to imagine little kids dancing and singing about "soldiers of God" while dressed in CAMO, for cryin' out loud, growing up to have a worldview any larger or more tolerant than a kid raised in the Taliban. One starts to wonder what Jesus would think of these folks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Parkbench87
Citizen
Username: Parkbench87

Post Number: 5414
Registered: 7-2001


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 11:01 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

All the information contained in the trailer is interesting but what I really need to know is whether they assemble around the camp fire at night and roast marshmallows and tell scary stories?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10706
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 11:27 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

As Woody Allen said, if Jesus came back and saw what people were doing in his name, he wouldn't stop vomiting.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15547
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 3:09 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think we should think carefully about what tolerance entails. Just because someone's practices are creepy to us doesn't mean they are harming anyone except maybe themselves. You don't harm me by writhing on the floor in your own church.

I'm reminded of how our attitudes towards homosexuality have changed in recent years. It used to be OK to make jokes about gays because we'd imagine their sexual acts, which would creep us out. But that's our problem (speaking as a heterosexual). The fact is, imagining anyone's sexual acts can be creepy, even straight people's. Leave that alone as long as they don't hurt us.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alleygater
Citizen
Username: Alleygater


Post Number: 2599
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 3:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You're right, no one is being harmed Tom. Those kids are totally normal. Convincing children to get into a religious fervor and becoming possessed by the spirit of the lord and writhing around on the floor well that's not harming anyone. So it's ok.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Innisowen
Citizen
Username: Innisowen

Post Number: 2384
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 3:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Try reading Kevin Phillip's American Theocracy for some documented perspectives on the Religious Right, Fundamental Christians, Christian Reconstructionists, or whatever banner they cloak themselves in.

Keep in mind that when there are children and adolescents writhing on the floor in paroxysms of joy, rapture, fervor, elation, or whatever state, there's usually NOT a psychologist or other therapist on site to ensure that these young people find their equilibrium again.

That's the scary part.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alleygater
Citizen
Username: Alleygater


Post Number: 2601
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 4:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Who needs a psychologist when you have the power of the lord on your side?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Señor Moment ©
Citizen
Username: Howardt

Post Number: 2466
Registered: 11-2004


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 4:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hahahahahaha!!!! That's HYSTERICAL!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Innisowen
Citizen
Username: Innisowen

Post Number: 2386
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 4:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

senor moment:

no. no. the hysteria is on the part of the participants.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

something witty
Citizen
Username: Buckneja

Post Number: 302
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Here's another issue that might be fodder for thought: churchianity vs evangelicism.
I looked up the terms online and found this helpful discussion on Wiki...

Churchianity describes beliefs or more specifically practices of a church that focuses on habits of church life specific to a particular Christian denomination instead of highlighting the teachings of Jesus.

In Europe, and most of Australia, US and Canada, evangelicism "...comprises everything from a liberal state church to a conservative free church in the Baptist or Pietist tradition." The term distinguishes Protestant-leaning churches from Orthodox or Catholic denominations and churches. But sometimes in the US (and some countries with Spanish influences and beliefs) "evangelical" is assumed erroneously to mean only those subscribing to "Pentecostalism." As is pointed out in several places on the web, someone with evangelical beliefs is sometimes assumed to be "...an evangelist, or evangelistic, especially when evangelism is practised assertively or aggressively" (Wikipedia).

Talk amongst yourselves...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15551
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alleygater, are you saying nothing in your life year-round would lead someone to raise his eyebrows about you? We're all weird in some ways. Please tell me how a religious fervor is somehow more harmful than a political fervor.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bettyd
Citizen
Username: Badjtdso

Post Number: 283
Registered: 12-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:16 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Another good, yet scary read on religious fundamentalism is "Under the Banner of Heaven", about fundamentalist Mormons. Polygamy, pedophilia, incest, and murder all ordered by God.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5737
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

With the exception of the one brief shot of a kid spasming on the floor, I didn't see anything in the clip that wouldn't have been appropriate at a pep rally.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Billy Jack
Citizen
Username: Kendalbill

Post Number: 228
Registered: 6-2002


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'm amazed at the lack of tolerance here. I would expect some of these comments from the usual suspects on other boards where the topic is Islam or something else. And I have criticized those comments when they come up.

This trailer seems to dwell on one section of Christianity. It creeps people here out. Fine. Some of it creeps me out, too. The beauty of America is we don't have to all believe the same thing. Roll with it.



Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob K
Supporter
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 12575
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 5:29 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I believe Pentecostals are the folks who feel the spirit of Christ and move around. I often wonder how much of this is the Emperor's New Clothes syndrome. It should be emphasized that this is a very small part of Chrisianity.





Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10712
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 6:24 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's difficult to know where freedom of religion leaves off and child abuse begins sometimes. There's tolerance, but then there's the Good Samaritan Law.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alleygater
Citizen
Username: Alleygater


Post Number: 2604
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 6:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Bob K, I disagree completely. Didn't you see that trailer, it clearly stated that there were 80 million evangelicals and that's enough to win ANY election. 80 million that's not what I would call a small part.

Billy Jack: don't get on your high horse with me. Every last one of those Evangelicals think I am going to burn in hell for not believing in Jesus. I don't consider that attitude as being particularly tolerant.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SO Ref
Citizen
Username: So_refugee

Post Number: 2211
Registered: 2-2005


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 6:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You're assuming that all 80 million evangelicals think alike. Do all african-americans think alike? Or all liberals? Or all conservatives?

Probably not, as there are african-american evangelicals, liberal evangelicals, conservative evangelicals...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

something witty
Citizen
Username: Buckneja

Post Number: 303
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 6:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A basic question, folks: Where exactly did the 80 million stat come from? Who tallied that figure? Is it from a census? From self report or from a categorized list of a research team? How many are kids, how many are of voting age?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob K
Supporter
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 12580
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 6:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alley, I was talking about the folks who end up on rolling around on the floor.

It is a mistake to lump all "evangelicals" as you call them into one group. It isn't as monolithic a group as you think.







Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Alleygater
Citizen
Username: Alleygater


Post Number: 2605
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 8:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Not what I think. What that idiot in the trailer stated. I just repeated it to make fun of the stupid guy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Charlton
Citizen
Username: Charlton

Post Number: 9
Registered: 8-2006
Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 8:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Indoctrination > "Gods army" > suicide bombers? - In the end it's all politics.

No way man, Jesus was the ultimate hipster, he would cause all forms of havoc for the establishment if he were living today. Read what he did 2 millennia ago.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Billy Jack
Citizen
Username: Kendalbill

Post Number: 229
Registered: 6-2002


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 10:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alleygater: I'll get off my high horse long enough to say that I don't believe you. You know better. I have to believe you are throwing out chum to get the argument going.

Bishop Tutu is "evangelical". Jimmy Carter is "evangelical". Bill Clinton is "evangelical".

All I have been saying is that "evangelical" is an enormous tent and the trailer shows only one particular strain. I don't agree with the message they seem to be telling their children (or at very least the way they are teaching) but it doesn't seem as outrageous as many other things out there. If your criticism is strictly about their child rearing, great..I probably agree.

As for hell, calm down. What do you care that some (not all) evangelicals think you might end up in hell if you don't accept Christ? Are you worried? Are they hurting you personally? I have no idea what you believe and I don't care. I have no idea where you will end up and I don't care about that either. Why do you care so much what evangelicals think? Can't you just accept their theology and move on? Or was that more chum?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10718
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 10:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tutu is Anglican. You don't hear this kind of thing from evangelicals:


Quote:

"Jesus did not say, 'I if I be lifted up I will draw some'," Tutu said, preaching in two morning festival services in Pasadena, California. "Jesus said, 'If I be lifted up I will draw all, all, all, all, all. Black, white, yellow, rich, poor, clever, not so clever, beautiful, not so beautiful. It's one of the most radical things. All, all, all, all, all, all, all, all. All belong. Gay, lesbian, so-called straight. All, all are meant to be held in this incredible embrace that will not let us go. All."
He continued: "Isn't it sad, that in a time when we face so many devastating problems – poverty, HIV/AIDS, war and conflict – that in our Communion we should be investing so much time and energy on disagreement about sexual orientation?"
Tutu said the Communion, which "used to be known for embodying the attribute of comprehensiveness, of inclusiveness, where we were meant to accommodate all and diverse views, saying we may differ in our theology but we belong together as sisters and brothers" now seems "hell-bent on excommunicating one another. God must look on and God must weep."


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15558
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 11:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Alleygater wrote: Every last one of those Evangelicals think I am going to burn in hell for not believing in Jesus.

I could not believe that for a minute.

I don't consider that attitude as being particularly tolerant.

Are you saying that you refuse to be more tolerant of them than they are of you?

I suspect your differences in belief are what's making you uncomfortable.

I heard the filmmaker interviewed on NPR. He is British so he did it as an outsider. He didn't seem to see his subjects in a negative light, so he probably didn't mean to depict them that way, either.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration