Archive through March 16, 2006 Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » South Orange Specific » Almost $500,000 tax increase / BOT lied » Archive through March 16, 2006 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Supporter
Username: Nohero

Post Number: 5186
Registered: 10-1999


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 9:42 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Reading that article reminded me of an old movie -
LOUIS: What in Heaven's name brought you to Casablanca?

RICK: My health. I came to Casablanca for the waters.

LOUIS: Waters? What waters? We are in the desert.

RICK: I was misinformed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael brant
Citizen
Username: Mbrant

Post Number: 139
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 9:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Looks like Art Taylor, Allen Rosen and Bill Calabrese are going up the river. Will John Gross be Captain of the ship?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave

Post Number: 8886
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 9:47 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think this means the public was misinformed from day one and there never was authentic public input about the expenditure?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Spitz
Supporter
Username: Doublea

Post Number: 1513
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 9:49 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Allan Rosen is chair of the finance committee. This episode really doesn't give one a feeling of confidence that the finance committee (or BOT) is making solid financial decisions.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SO1969
Citizen
Username: Bklyn1969

Post Number: 229
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 9:54 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Congratulations are in order for Michael Goldberg. He brought in the quotes - even threatened to replay them from his laptop - and forced the trustees to admit that they misspoke, were wrong, whatever.

I think it is apparent to all now - thanks to Michael's tenacity - that the Trustees knew (or should have known)what they were doing and those that represented that the monies for this project were somehow restricted grant monies to be used for this project alone were almost certainly lying (Taylor seemed sincere - also seemed horribly incompetent for not knowing, but did seem sincere).

A resident summarized that the monies for the Tony Smith sculpture are, in effect, a tax increase because they are totally fungible and could replace other monies the Village is borrowing to spend on other projects (like SOPAC, village hall, library, etc).

Trustee Jennings challenged the tax increase characterization. It was disturbing that Trustee Jennings didn't understand the logic of the resident's assertion. But she at least had the courage to recogize his remarks.

What do the other trustees have to say for themselves? Mark, Eric? Both voted for a tax increase while a laundry list of needs goes unmet and the debt piles up.

p.s. Now is the time to counter Eric Devaris's 20 letters to the editor in favor of the project. Respond to the Star Ledger article by writing your own Letter to the Editor.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave

Post Number: 8887
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 9:59 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Everything we knew about the sculpture financing until now was based on lies from Calabrese, Taylor and Rosen at public meetings. The project needs to be postponed so authentic debate and public input can happen.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Just The Aunt
Supporter
Username: Auntof13

Post Number: 4327
Registered: 1-2004


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 10:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mc Cheesey-
Well the student newspaper does mention at least one place in town where the students can get a great deal. Free pizza from I think 4-5pm and $1 drink specials. Considering most college students don't turn 21 until their senior year, or maybe the second half of the junior year, you might have a point about a bar that doesn't check id's. But, I think I remember a thread not to long ago discussing a bar that already does this. No it wasn't Bunny's)

I remember when I went to SH there was a pub on campus. Then again, the drinking age back then was 18.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jim Murphy
Citizen
Username: Jimmurphy

Post Number: 261
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 10:45 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Why are we all treating this as a surprise?

Mark Rosner told us about this "switch" last August and we debated this issue ad-infinitum in the "Should public funds be used for Art in South Orange" thread.


Quote:


mrosner
Citizen
Username: Mrosner

Post Number: 2174
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 10:17 am:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pdg: The $15,000 cost for the village assumed no land acquisition (I think) so the 200 spots for $3,000,000 for a covered garage is about right (well one floor will be covered).

I just want to correct something that I misstated earlier about the CBDG funds. Technically, the village had earmarked $250,000 for another project. The other project was eligible for the CBDG funds. The village did a swap where we are using the $250,000 for the statue and the other project gets the grant money(emphasis added) since it was definitely eligible for CBDG funds. The county was happy to accomodate because CBDG funds are on a use it or lose it basis and they preferred to see the money stay in Essex County.
So when I said we were using grant money, technically that is not true. It also means that the statue can go anywhere in S. Orange, not just in the redevelopment zone (although the Tony Smith Estate has to agree to the location).

I know that we could also debate whether the now freed up $250,000 should have (or could have ) been used for something else. The other project that the grant funds were used towards was SOPAC. (emphasis added by Jim Murphy)
Sorry for the confusion, but the basics of the debate remain the same - Should the village use public funds for art and if yes, where is the best location for this statue.

PDG: Your total cost estimate of $440,000 is correct plus we have been told that about $30,000 has been raised privately.
It would probably be safe to assume that the final cost will be higher than the estimate that we have been given.(emphasis added)

I do suggest that others follow PDG's lead and sent a letter to village hall with your thoughts. A petition can be effective if used correctly (real names and addresses must be used for one).




Are the supporters finally bailing off this sinking ship now that everyone is finally starting to understand where the money is coming from?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Just The Aunt
Supporter
Username: Auntof13

Post Number: 4328
Registered: 1-2004


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 10:53 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I must be missing something. Why is it so important for us to accept this 'gift' now? Why can't it wait until after PAC is built and we, the residents can vote on it? With the BOE election coming up it might not be easy to get letters printed in the Snooze Wrecked. Maybe we can all throw some money into the pot for a full page ad, have MHD write something up we can all put our names to. Or each of us can write a letter for the page. I can't imagine a page would cost more then $150. I'll even throw in the first $20.

A better suggestion, I think someone might have already made, write the Ledger. We have to somehow get this information out there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

mrosner
Citizen
Username: Mrosner

Post Number: 2676
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 10:54 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jim: Thanks for posting that. I had tried a quick search before I had started the new thread. I was just going to re-post the above.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3539
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 10:58 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Maybe if Calabrese, Taylor & Rosen had read MOL, they wouldn't be "misinformed".
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jim Murphy
Citizen
Username: Jimmurphy

Post Number: 262
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 11:07 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You're welcome Mark.

For those who want to read further, the discussion is here: /discus/messages/3133/84938.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kaiser Wilhelm
Citizen
Username: Parkingsux

Post Number: 344
Registered: 6-2005


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 11:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The problem is that the BoT accepted the project and voted to go ahead with this public art acquisition irrespective of the disinformation and most current lies. If Mark knew the truth in August, don't you think Alan, Art and the emperor didn't know? It's the same old way of doing business in the village. The conflicted VP decides to satisfy an element of his constituency to the detriment of everyone else. But why? To be recognized favorably amoung this segment of his constituents for the sole purpose that one day they'll be a vocal minority group spearheaded to have the Arts Center named for him in tribute (barf). The all powerful one knows that the sleepy residents are uninformed, so let's not raise a fuss.....

It is demeaning to the informed residents to watch how they are now lying about lying....and the realization of this unyielding circle of lies that they propagate from week to week...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 92
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 12:01 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I agree the town owes Michael Goldberg enormous gratitude. During BOT meetings, the village president scarcely allows him and others to speak much of the time and hardly ever responds directly to direct and reasonable questions.

One of many things that makes village hall look like an asylum is the claim at the last BOT meeting by the village administrator that residents should not ask trustees about their decisions, including if trustees know how their decisions are being paid for. If the public can't ask their elected representatives how and why they make the decisions they do, what good are the representatives? Perhaps it is a sign of Mr. Gross' remorse for his part in the confusion about the funding for the sculpture that he may have over reacted. But even if his judgement is impaired on this point, the public's should not be. They have every reason in the world to ask elected officials to account for their actions. If the trustees want Mr. Gross to be a scapegoat for their own mistakes, it only further impugns their actions. If Mr. Gross is the source of false information given to trustees, they should ensure that it doesn't happen again. But regardless of what Mr. Gross has done or has failed to do, it is entirely wrong for him to claim that the public should not ask its representatives for straight answers. (It also strikes me as unnecessarily disadvantaging himself, but that is another matter.)

On more than one occasion, for more than one issue, what Mr. Goldberg has revealed about how the town doesn't work, happens repeatedly. You ask one or more trustees something and s/he doesn't know or contradicts another trustee. Then you ask town employees who may say something completely different from what trustees tell you. No one accepts responsibility for the fact that you simply cannot get the truth out of anyone because no one really seems to know. This pattern is so deeply ingrained in the BOT and village hall it is now endemic. Yet the attempt by anyone to make the "cloud of unknowing" on the part of any trustee legitimate, aside from being deeply mistaken, is also intolerable.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SO1969
Citizen
Username: Bklyn1969

Post Number: 230
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 12:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jim and Mark

Mark clearly did state this on MOL in August. Maybe that is part of why I've continued to rail against it since I learned of it.

However, in a public meeting with the camera on and the other trustees present, when a citizen made the point that this was in effect a tax increase, Trustee Jennings disagreed with that characterization and Mark said nothing, as best as I can recall, in support of the citizen's assertion.

It may be asking too much of Mark for him to explain to his fellow trustees the cause/effect relationships of their decisions, but somehow they need to understand them better or be removed from office.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael brant
Citizen
Username: Mbrant

Post Number: 143
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 12:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Forget what Jenning says! She has no idea what is going on.
It is very clear at least to me that Mr. Rosner is the only substance sitting on the board. I have said this before and I will say it again. The balance of the board are emotional decision makers not business people. And I know people are going to say that government is not a business but I say when you are spending the dollars that this board is in control of you must have business sense. And other than Mark I have seen none.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 93
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:20 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Trustee Jennings should understand things better than she often seems to. In time and with diligence, she still may. Yet she does seem to have more courage than many other trustees, however, and in the current atmosphere, this is no small virtue, nor one to be discounted or taken for granted. Her courage might spread to others. I'm hoping it will.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sheena Collum SHU
Citizen
Username: Sheena_collum

Post Number: 604
Registered: 4-2005


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think Trustee Jennings has been quite impressive thus far... she has exceeded my initial expectations to be frank.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael brant
Citizen
Username: Mbrant

Post Number: 146
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:26 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

COURAGE? What is this the wizard of OZ? I want trustees that do the job.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 2598
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sheena, in what was has she impressed you? What has she done to exceed your expectations?

I don't mean this to slam her, I'm really curious what actions she has taken that are worthy of praise.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3543
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:48 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hey...you can't talk about Trustee Jennings here in this "chat room". This is a "chat room", right?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 94
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:49 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

One thing Trustee Jennings has done is to not be on a committee that influences financing for the schools since her husband is a middle school administrator. I admire her for this. She was asked about it at the last meeting of the BOT and answered quickly and clearly, unlike others who are asked about possible conflicts of interest.

Her weakness seems to be to let her heart lead her when her head needs to. Because she likes many of her fellow trustees, she wants to defend them, even when they are wrong. But they need her to be independent in her judgement about their actions, even if she likes them personally. Her courage may enable her to do this, once she realizes she needs to.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 95
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:51 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What did you say about that bee thing, MHD? Doesn't it qualify you as a techie? Not everyone is.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael brant
Citizen
Username: Mbrant

Post Number: 149
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sheena I would like to hear that answer also.
How has she exceeded your expectations? How has she impressed you please be specific.
I am very interested in your answer. Maybe I am wrong hear and have missed something.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 96
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 2:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Michael Brant, our leaders are what they are. One important question is whether they can improve or not, learn or not, lead better than they have or not. It may be OZ now, but that doesn't mean even leaders won't awaken from their dream.

Since they are your leaders, and you can't get rid of them now, would you rather have them amend their behavior than remain as they are between now and the next election?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3544
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

SORising,

Look at the Green bar at the top of your screen right now. Mine says "Message Board". How about you?

Chat Room is here: http://www.maplewoodonline.com/chat/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 97
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

True enough, MHD. But don't we also chat here together? What claim does virtual reality have over real language?

Nice chatting with you about this. (Just couldn't resist.)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3546
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

LOL!

BTW...did you hear there will be an almost $500,000 tax increase and the BOT lied about it?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael brant
Citizen
Username: Mbrant

Post Number: 151
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I am very very concerned. This is what I see.
1) Tony Smith financial disaster.
2) SOPAC looking for money (a art center project opening as a movie theater first because there is not enough money to complete the project)
3) Beifus disaster
4) Super market disaster
5) Syiad plaza disaster
6) Millennium looking to bulldoze Valley st.
7) A gazebo covered in pigeon crap
8) a fountain I hear never worked
9) THD construction
10) 3rd st. gas station boarded up I hear we own that space.

And if we are Oz where the hell is Emerald city...we certainty have the brainless scare crow and no sight of the wizard.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

jayjay
Citizen
Username: Jayjayp

Post Number: 479
Registered: 6-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:33 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

As for Jennings, did she remove herself from the Board Of School Estimate Committee or was she called on it and then stepped down? I seem to remember her asking to be put on that committee when Calabrese handed out committee assignments at the initial reorganization meeting. Maybe someone can recall for certain.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

mrosner
Citizen
Username: Mrosner

Post Number: 2677
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jayjay: She is an alternate on the Board of Education Liason Committee (not sure when that meets or they ever have). That appointment was made at the same time the Board of school of estimate was discussed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

SOrising
Citizen
Username: Sorising

Post Number: 98
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 3:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Point taken, MHD. But of the SO bully boys under greatest suspicion, Trustee Jennings isn't among them. And she may just realize she needs to stay out of their tree house.

MB, yes, I think multiple and ever larger disasters are just beginning to become evident. But wasn't Dorothy, the one with the dream, the real wizard you seek? Private line me if you want to talk about it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

jayjay
Citizen
Username: Jayjayp

Post Number: 480
Registered: 6-2005
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 4:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

With all the other trustees available, why is Jennings even an alternate?

And Sheena, what has Jennings done to exceed your expectations? From what I see of her, her intention is to push her demographic agenda, something I don't recall her talking about in the campaign. I wonder how she could have voted for the fabrication of the sculpture without finding out whether the fabricator conforms to the "new demographic." Didn't she once say that she would impose that criteria on anyone doing business with the village?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

mrosner
Citizen
Username: Mrosner

Post Number: 2678
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 4:45 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

jayjay: You would have to ask Calabrese and Rosen about the committee assignments.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3550
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 - 8:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Michael B,

From your post at 3:13pm, the "good news" is you can cross off the following 2 items thanks to the "Coming Soon" sculpture:

7) A gazebo covered in pigeon crap
8) a fountain I hear never worked

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3555
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Thursday, March 16, 2006 - 10:39 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Great new blog entry (as always) by Tracey on the subject: http://www.nj.com/weblogs/southorange/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Otto von Bismarck
Citizen
Username: Parkingsux

Post Number: 347
Registered: 6-2005


Posted on Thursday, March 16, 2006 - 11:08 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


Quote:

Yes, the toilet bowl remark was a cheap shot, but honestly, folks--it's how I'm feeling about our town these days. It's hard to come on here and be Miss Village Cheerleader when it seems like we are so stuck in a rut and when such poor planning and decision making seem to be happening and when I'm beginning to wonder if I was sold a bill of goods when I moved to this town and thought that I was becoming a part of a vibrant village. Sigh--thank god spring is coming. Even the Beifus site looks a little better when it's warm out.




Keep the faith, it's not the village - it's the administration. Once we address the problem that leads us to despair, the sun will shine for a much better and lucid future for you and the village community.

We simply have to rethink the way we establish our governance. The cost is too high and the services are of questionable quality. The administration is led by a triumvirate. The village administrator and attorney should be summarily relieved of their positions and the village president investigated for conflicts of interest as it relates to village sanctioned redevelopment efforts for the past 9 years. Open the closed doors, we need to set a new course, now more than ever...

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3561
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Thursday, March 16, 2006 - 3:13 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Any mention of this "fiasco" in the News Record today?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro

Post Number: 2615
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Thursday, March 16, 2006 - 3:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's not "news" to the News Wretched. Now, if someone were to write a nice hatchet job on a prominent townie who disagres with Bill C, then we're talking real news.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

MHD
Citizen
Username: Mayhewdrive

Post Number: 3564
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Thursday, March 16, 2006 - 10:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Listen VERY CAREFULLY to the exact words in this Video Clip:

http://www.howard-levison.com/Sculpturequote.wmv

Is this someone who is lying, clueless or both?

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration