Author |
Message |
   
talk-it-up
Citizen Username: Talkitup
Post Number: 222 Registered: 3-2004
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 6:45 am: |
|
Supporter Username: Vermontgolfer Post Number: 438 Registered: 12-2002 Posted on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 - 9:21 pm: ________________________________________ I guess most of you who are not bothered by the 'gun on the hill' missed the speaker last night who is a Vietnam veteran, who expressed how uncomfortable this made him and spoke quite eloquently how he didn't feel it was the place for such an exhibit. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why is it that there was no discussion about this item? Why is it that Veterans are not considered? Why has the pain that this display causes not been considered? This is a very bad message "The Gun on the Hill" and it divides the town.In this supposedly diverse community, we are supposed to consider being politically correct for everyone - but there was NO consideration for Veterans of War. Why is it that this man, a resident of the community for over twenty years, was ignored? Which of you is prepared to support his feelings and the feelings of other Veterans that may be impacted by "The Gun on the Hill"? The "artists" may say "that is what art is for, causing controversy, and therefore it is successful. “ A quote from the Star Ledger Article reads: "We've all been trying to lead our normal lives since 9/11," says Pierro director Judy Wukitsch. "And on through the war, the natural disasters, all the disasters, trying not to let it weigh us down so we cannot function. But you can't ignore trauma and depression forever. Artists have been doing this work all along, they just didn't have a place to show it. And I think hosting this show now in South Orange is almost cathartic for all of us." Who are they to say we must feel the pain? Who are they to say we must exhibit it? NO OTHER PLACE wanted to show it the article indicates, I ASK “WHY US?” The murder up the avenue also got a reaction and started everyone talking. That does not make it a good thing and that does not make it art. It is not up to the Gallery to cause grief. If someone wants to view it they should go behind closed doors. They should have a choice. The Viet Nam veteran in his discussion indicated how much time passed before he could view the monument in Washington "the depression in the ground" because of personal pain and then compared his feelings about that to the elevated "Gun on the Hill". He talked about the AK-47 as the weapon that was used against the troops in Nam and how could anyone come close to knowing how he (and other Vets) feel when being exposed to the gun placed "high on the hill". He talked about exposure to that war and its horrors for over a year, over a year, over a year….. How could anyone but a Vet understand what it was like??? How could anyone be so self righteous and condescending to think that it is 'we' the common person that does not understand art and that we are all ignorant and yet it is they that do not understand the reality of war. How could they WANT to force that gun down our throats? WHERE HAVE YOU ALL BEEN? WHY IS IT THAT VERY FEW PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT THIS? THERE IS A MEETING Tonight at Village Hall Monday May 22 at 8:00pm WHY NOT SUPPORT YOUR TROOPS, YOUR VETERANS, AND THE CHILDREN AND DEMAND THAT THIS DISPLAY BE REMOVED. I am very saddened by all this. This is a Village that is supposed to bring people together and it has divided them. This will be up for Memorial Day and the Fourth of July, why?? .
|
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5103 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 7:34 am: |
|
I agree with you 100%. But you have the idiots at the PG to blame as well as Andy Brady who doesn't even have the decency to return calls. The 'meeting' people were supposed to be able to speak at was a joke. Since this is a PUBLIC park I want equal time! Im going to have one of those 'WE SUPPORT OUR TROOPS' banners made and insist it get's displayed along with the gun. If it is refused, wll thn there might be a problem... Anyone behind me on this? |
   
joel dranove
Citizen Username: Jdranove
Post Number: 491 Registered: 1-2006
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 9:26 am: |
|
me. jd |
   
K_soze
Citizen Username: K_soze
Post Number: 263 Registered: 11-2005

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 9:27 am: |
|
pretty quiet in here  |
   
Soparents
Citizen Username: Soparents
Post Number: 367 Registered: 5-2005
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 9:39 am: |
|
This is not just about supporting our troops, this is also about respecting our troops.... They will always have my support, they have over and over again earned my respect, and will forever have my thanks. This thing on Floods Hill (my kids now call it Gun Hill) is neither supportive or in the least bit respectful, and the only time I will be thankful is when it is gone.
|
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5106 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 10:54 am: |
|
Soparents- But it will be there until July!!! Andy Brady, I know you read MOL because you have told me this in person. Please explain to us WHY you won't respond to us? WHY do you let the PG people push you around? They do NOT own the park!!! To those members of the PG, you people are a disgrace!!! |
   
joel dranove
Citizen Username: Jdranove
Post Number: 493 Registered: 1-2006
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 11:00 am: |
|
They are their ideological captives do pay his salary. jd |
   
talk-it-up
Citizen Username: Talkitup
Post Number: 223 Registered: 3-2004
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 11:03 am: |
|
EVERYONE TONIGHT AT THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING!!! WE MUST ALL BE THERE. THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT THAT WE CARE ENOUGH TO COME OUT. IT'S MORE THAN JUST WORDS. IT IS ABOUT RESPECT. IN THIS WORLD WHERE EVERYONE NEEDS TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT UNTIL YOU WANT TO CHOKE ON IT WHY? WHY? IS THERE NO RESPECT FOR THE PEOPLE THAT REALLY SUFFER IN THIS CASE - THE VETERANS, THE SERVICE MEN AND WOMEN, THE CHILDREN, EVEN THE POLICE THAT HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS EVERY DAY. WHY CAN THE GALLERY HAVE A PERSONAL OPINION BUT NOT THE POLICE FORCE.
|
   
Old and Gray
Citizen Username: Pastmyprime
Post Number: 372 Registered: 2-2005
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 11:09 am: |
|
What is sad about this town is many of the anti war contingent seems to not support the troops. As a life long republican, I am NOT in support of the war effort or President Bush. With that being said, The United States Military should be supported by all Americans regardless of your background and beliefs...If not supported at least Respected!
|
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3190 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 11:33 am: |
|
Quote:What is sad about this town is many of the anti war contingent seems to not support the troops.
On what do you base this claim? |
   
Phenixrising
Citizen Username: Phenixrising
Post Number: 1687 Registered: 9-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 1:01 pm: |
|
What is sad about this town is many of the anti war contingent seems to not support the troops. That's NOT true. I'm anti against this illegal war, however, I DO support our troops. They signed-up for the arm forces for whatever their reasons, unfortunately, Bush put us in a situation and these troops have a job to do. It's a shame that a good majority of the troops are now dis-illusioned about the war in Iraq. And now the armed services has to deal with this: Army suicides up since Iraq war By Lolita C. Baldor Associated Press WASHINGTON — The number of U.S. Army soldiers who took their own lives increased last year to the highest total since 1993, despite a growing effort by the Army to detect problems and prevent suicides. In 2005, a total of 83 soldiers committed suicide, compared with 67 in 2004, and 60 in 2003 — the year U.S.-led forces invaded Iraq. The totals include regular Army soldiers and National Guard and Reserve members who were deployed on active duty. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060522/NEWS08/605 220357/1018/NEWS |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5108 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 1:02 pm: |
|
Joel But SO DO WE!!! I think there are a lot more of us not part of this group paying his salary then there are in this group. I think it's time to get some of the Veteran's Groups involved and to get this national coverage. I think this is much more important then the music ban in the schools. As soon as I get a banner, and am denied the right to have it displayed on Floods Hill directly behind the other display, much to the dismay of my sister and mom, the story will be bigger then MOL and the Snooze Wreckered. Which by the way had a GREAT editorial last week! Thank you Tara!!!
|
   
Glock 17
Citizen Username: Glock17
Post Number: 966 Registered: 7-2005

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 1:08 pm: |
|
WHy not just go rip it up at night? |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5109 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 1:17 pm: |
|
Phen- Like you I am against this illegal war but I support our troops. I believe there are men and women fighting the war who signed up after 9.11 because it's what they believed they needed to do. And I believe the display is an insult to those living in town with loved one fighting the war. I think, along with many others who the town refuses to listen to, this latest anti-war message does not belong on Floods Hill. Why can't it be in one of the parks that doesn't host organized spoting events? Or how about on the front lawn f one of the board members of the PG? It's not the same as the library having books you don't agree with, or the internet having sites you don't agree with. In those situations you have the choice NOT to check the book out or visit the site. The children on some of the town teams do not have a choice. Most of the games my nephews play are played at one of the fields across from Floods Hill. What are they and the other children suppose to do? Not play? If this anti war message can be there (which most people don't even realize what the message is); the equal time shgould be given to an opposing view? Or a different view. Supporting the troops is not pro war, as some people aould like to insist. It's too bad the PG people, Andy and the others who won't listen don't stop to reflect on the fact if it weren't for the Veterans our Country wouldn't enjoy some of the Freedoms we do... |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5110 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 1:22 pm: |
|
Glock- Don't go there! Someone already did something like that. I got blamed, remember? Not to mention, I posted a week or so ago it's now being watched around the clock. As much s rumor has it the police are as unhappy with this display (heard there were meetings with Andy but he wouldn't budge. Something about 'censorship'); anyone attempting to vandalize the plastic flowers will be arrested. I'd like to know who's paying for this? |
   
jayjay
Citizen Username: Jayjayp
Post Number: 662 Registered: 6-2005
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 1:24 pm: |
|
Soon we won't have to think about it as the grass grows and covers the whole thing. |
   
mjh
Supporter Username: Mjh
Post Number: 538 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 2:03 pm: |
|
"...if it weren't for the Veterans our Country wouldn't enjoy some of the Freedoms we do... " Like freedom of speech, for instance? |
   
buddybak
Citizen Username: Buddybak
Post Number: 13 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 3:14 pm: |
|
just let the guy that cuts the hill take the machine and run it over and put up a new piece of art that Supports our Veterans for this Weekend of Memorial Day and to H*** with the Perio Gallery. |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5112 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 3:59 pm: |
|
mjh There is a difference between Freedom of Speech on one's own property and shoving one's political beliefs down the throats of others on public land. A place I might add many children play. Especially when a differing view is not permitted. No? |
   
Swearengen
Citizen Username: Swearengen
Post Number: 30 Registered: 7-2005

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 4:04 pm: |
|
What do you think the artist's political beliefs are? |
   
Nicky D
Citizen Username: Nickynewark
Post Number: 1 Registered: 5-2006
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 4:07 pm: |
|
I don't understand! As far as I am concerned this is litter on the hill. Why hasn't anyone picked up the litter? |
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3197 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 4:37 pm: |
|
JTA, while I agree with you in geenral about the display, I don't see how "Support the Troops" is a differing viewpoint. Tangential, perhaps, but not opposing. And how do you know a differing viewpoint is not permitted? Are you constructing an art project? |
   
talk-it-up
Citizen Username: Talkitup
Post Number: 224 Registered: 3-2004
| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 5:26 pm: |
|
Village Hall Tonight Get off this thing because it does nothing. The AK47 does not belong on the hill..... Give them a piece of your mind in person. You said Andy reads this, so why not go tell him face to face, all of them. |
   
SO Ref
Citizen Username: So_refugee
Post Number: 1835 Registered: 2-2005

| Posted on Monday, May 22, 2006 - 8:49 pm: |
|
If Andy ceded to you, couldn't Andy be accused of allowing "you" to push him around? Talk about trying to ram your beliefs down someone's throat... I'm glad this is the most important issue at stake in the village. |
   
Lizziecat
Citizen Username: Lizziecat
Post Number: 1232 Registered: 5-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:07 am: |
|
I drove by Flood's hill today. Grass is growing all around the "art" work. In another couple of days it will be obscured by the grass and will be difficult to see. Mother Nature is getting rid of it for you. |
   
Glock 17
Citizen Username: Glock17
Post Number: 970 Registered: 7-2005

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:15 am: |
|
It's odd. This is coming from the militant guy with the firearm name. That piece of artwork sucks. It really does. It doesn't prove anything (although AK-47's are legendary..but still..no point) and it's ugly. |
   
Matt Foley
Citizen Username: Mattfoley
Post Number: 651 Registered: 6-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 1:46 am: |
|
I have been anti PG for quite a long time. I moved back to SO 3 years ago while the floating trash piece was in place. Since then we have had naked hairy women with tempra paint spilling over their nether regions, a bundle of sticks, a guy who jumps from heights greater than his own, etc. etc. The Judy W. woman uses our town as her own canvas. Who needs needless "art"? |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5117 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 7:08 am: |
|
Swear- The 'claim' is based on what the PG has said about the artist and the display. It is in protest of the war. It's supposed to be based on what Bush said as the war began... |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5118 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 7:09 am: |
|
Is the PG a private foundation? |
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3199 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 8:46 am: |
|
JTA, so you are saying that being against the war means you don't support the troops? As I said, protesting the war and supporting the troops are not mutually exclusive. |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5122 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 9:06 am: |
|
For me, they are not mutually exclusive. But for the artist and others, who knows. If the artist and PG people believe the same, they have no problem with a very large banner that says 'We support Our Troops' Directly behind this diaplay. Correct? |
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3201 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 9:28 am: |
|
But is it art? I can't imagine the PG controls what goes on in the park. I would guess the Rec Dept. would be the ones to decide what goes on the hill. If Andy Brady says yes, there's your answer. But him saying no does not mean that he does not support the troops. |
   
Soda
Supporter Username: Soda
Post Number: 3970 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 9:32 am: |
|
JTA: The quote, "We will be met with flowers" is from VP Cheney, not "W". Matt: Judy Wukitsch Rocks. She has done immense service for our Village since way before you arrived back in town. Besides creating the Gallery (with her late husband Lenny) with nothing but sweat equity and volunteer labor, turning totally wasted space into an award-winning arts venue for the Baird, she was an important part of the volunteer efforts to create Arts In The Park, which produces cool jazz concerts at the Baird, the highly-praised Giants of Jazz series at S.O.M.S., free concerts and movies in Meadowlands Park, etc, etc, all done while raising kids. You (and, on accasion, I) might not love all the art the Baird has presented, and that's our right. However, dumping on somebody whose commitment and accomplishments here in S.O. stand head and shoulders above your own is just bush league. Would you be happy if all the P.G. was closed, or the "needless" arts education programs in our schools were dropped? You seem very proud of your online image as a "regular guy" (a generous description), so I'm happy for you. I'm even happier that many, many Villagers feel differently than you do about art in general, and Judy Wukitsch in particular. -s. |
   
Dave
Supporter Username: Dave
Post Number: 9549 Registered: 4-1997

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 9:33 am: |
|
The art supports the troops by adding pressure to end the war. If you want a counter-statement, you'll need a "We Support Donald Rumsfeld" banner. |
   
FlyingSpaghettiMonst
Citizen Username: Noodlyappendage
Post Number: 144 Registered: 11-2005

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 9:56 am: |
|
The speaker last night who ranted against the art piece is obviously unbalanced and fixated on the Vietnam war and its effect on her husband and family. What McCain's speech at the New School had to do with the work or even South Orange is illogical. My take on the flower piece is it Greatly supports our troops and visualizes the lies told by the administration to falsly justify their being sent to Iraq. |
   
MHD
Citizen Username: Mayhewdrive
Post Number: 4103 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 10:04 am: |
|
In South Orange, we ALREADY have a symbol to visualize the LIES told by the administration:
 |
   
FlyingSpaghettiMonst
Citizen Username: Noodlyappendage
Post Number: 147 Registered: 11-2005

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 10:09 am: |
|
Can it, MHD. Try to stay ONE TOPIC for at least one thread!!! |
   
buddybak
Citizen Username: Buddybak
Post Number: 15 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 11:36 am: |
|
It seems that the P G controls what goes on in the Parks and Rec. Department over Andy Brady, not the Board of Trustees who pay his salery. By the way the guy who did the work on Floods Hill was paid to do the so called art work from the arts fund. |
   
Dave
Supporter Username: Dave
Post Number: 9553 Registered: 4-1997

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 11:56 am: |
|
I think the gallery recieves funding from NJSCA and private sources. |
   
joel dranove
Citizen Username: Jdranove
Post Number: 498 Registered: 1-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:05 pm: |
|
FSM and Dave: Those were the most satirical takes on "art" in town, exposing those who support our freedoms for the fakes they are, and I applaud your clear thoughts. Keep up the good work. jd |
   
Dave
Supporter Username: Dave
Post Number: 9554 Registered: 4-1997

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:09 pm: |
|
Here are some other artists participating in Headlines who are deserving of protest or praise:
Quote:Jonathan Allen Allen’s paintings incorporate images from popular culture, politics and mass media. The figures in these works are appropriated from newspaper photographs. With their traced outlines they seem to float as apparitions over dreamlike landscapes. A. J. Bocchino Bocchino collects headlines from the New York Times which he organizes chronologically, and color-codes according to subject, (yellow for political issues, red for wars and conflicts, etc.) For the Headlines exhibition he covered the largest wall of the gallery with a decade of headlines, the different colors revealing the kinds of stories that led the news coverage on each day. Standing in front of the wall, the viewer confronts his own recent history. Brendan Carroll Carroll’s installation comprises a grid of Polaroids on which he types passages from contemporary literature by Tim O’Brien, Cormac McCarthy and Thom Jones. While the pictures appear to be snapshots of soldiers in battle, they are actually scenarios constructed by the artist. The pairing of texts and photographs blurs the lines between fact and fiction, the verbal and the visual. Mike Estabrook Estabrook’s work examines sources of information. To make his painting, Disaster at 1:47 a.m. , May 4, 2003 , he performed an internet Google image search using only the word “disaster.” He replicated the page of thumbnail results in a large-scale painting that not only provides a permanent record of actual disasters, but is also a picture of how we gather information in the digital age. His video, Yllier'O Llib (2005), is a 9 minute loop of all of the footage taken from one episode of “The O'Reilly Factor” in which Bill O'Reilly speaks directly to the camera, played backwards, with a random list of perverse suggestions scrolling across the bottom of the screen. Estabrook renders the media icon unintelligible and subverts the fear of subliminal messages. Joy Garnett Garnett collects images from various internet sources and uses them to make paintings. Her Strange Weather series includes images of Hurricane Katrina. By removing pictures from their sources, and transforming them into sublime landscape paintings, she explores the malleability of media images and their constantly changing meanings. Her own appropriation and reuse of these images underscores the distortion and manipulation of images by the media and the government. Laura Greengold Greengold’s Television Paintings are installed like a bank of televisions, suggesting a media control room or an electronics store. Each painting reproduces the image of a person taken from a television program that Greengold videotaped and scanned. She made each painting in a single session, painting in lines from top to bottom, imitating the way images are loaded onto a screen. Curt Ikens Ikens has created an interactive installation for this exhibition, arranging twelve bales of shredded newspaper to form two blocky chairs. Each bale contains one month’s issues of The Newark Star-Ledger. Each day of the exhibition a fresh issue of the current day’s Star-Ledger is provided for visitors to peruse and share from the comforts of the bale chairs. The visitor can absorb the current news while literally sitting on the old news. Similarly, in One Week’s News, information from a finite period of time is rendered inaccessible, addressing the deterioration of information. Peter Jacobs Jacobs has used the newspaper as raw material for his project, The Collage Journal. On March 31, 2005, he created a 9 x 12 inch collage from that day’s New York Times and he continued the process daily for an entire year. For this exhibition, Jacobs has scanned his original collages to create facsimiles of his sketchbook journals. Visitors are invited to look through the journals, adding another layer of personal interpretation. Hiroshi Kumagai In his Xerograph Green Series, Kumagai explores the relationship between war imagery and popular culture. His Japanese anime-inspired figures play against a camouflage background, enacting scenes of death, disaster, heroism and camaraderie. His Instant Message series examines how this shorthand “language” has changed the way we send, receive and interpret information. In this work the abbreviation OMG (“Oh my God”) takes on a new meaning, with an implied association of religion—in this case, Christianity and Islam. The pseudo-Arabic font suggests the idea of stereotypes and how they can influence our perceptions. Seen against a backdrop of camouflage, these instant messages hint at the background of war that hovers on the edge of any discussion about these two religions. Jason Lujan Lujan examines the concept of “Homeland Security” as it relates to the Native American struggle with colonization in the Americas. For his project, Selections form the Native American Activist Handbook, he downloaded pages from U.S. Army training manuals available on the internet. By changing the language to imply that the “good guys” are American Indians, and the “enemy” or “terrorist invader” is the United States government, Lujan transforms the material into a training manual for Native Americans. The work questions the concept of “homeland,” and suggests that the meaning changes according to who defines it. Julie Peppito Peppito’s work often explores the intersection of consumer culture and politics, and includes a range of personal and universal symbols. She describes We work hard not to see that we are criminals as a narrative about the cycle of violence and how we avoid responsibility for it by “demonizing others, buying needless stuff, watching TV and working hard.” In Mr. Cheney’s Accident, (a drawing created specifically for this exhibition), Peppito addresses a recent headline that raised questions about the timing of news stories. The text accompanying the work splices together news reports of the incident with statistics of deaths and casualties resulting from the war in Iraq. Henry Sanchez Sanchez appropriates images from political advertisements, campaign flyers and newspapers to make digital prints. He obscures the faces and other parts of the figures by adorning them with glitter, attempting to reveal the sense of adoration and mystery he finds in political flyers and mailings. The use of glitter to mask the features of politicians creates an interesting tension between glamour and mystery, embellishment and disguise. Karina Aguilera Skvirsky For her photographic series Backyards, Skvirsky takes images of ordinary Iraqi civilians in moments of prayer, and imagines them performing their gestures on American soil. Using actors to re-enact poses taken directly from news photographs, she places them in the suburban landscape. These works examine how meaning is altered by removing the context of war. In Blowback, victims of war and disasters are symbolically represented as zombies, slowly appearing in the landscape of Central Park. The soundtrack, sampled and composed from classic horror movie tracks, emphasizes the characters’ truncated physical movements. The work explores the xenophobia that has become a mainstay in the news and internalized in our culture. Lynn Sullivan Sullivan’s ongoing sculptural project, My Falluja recreates the gestures and positions of Iraqi citizens portrayed in the New York Times coverage. Since 2003 she has been collecting articles about the Iraq war. Using paper pulp made from the newsprint, she fashions anonymous monochromatic figures that mimic poses from the articles. She pairs these painted pulp figures with newspaper clippings she saved. A short video presents the acts of cutting, saving and reading these clippings, and examines the relationship between the figures and their ultimate source. Carlo Vialu Vialu’s series, We Will Be Greeted with Flowers (a Case of Myopia) takes its inspiration from words uttered by Paul Wolfowitz before the war in Iraq. Vialu assembles pieces of flower jigsaw puzzles in the shapes of weapons and other symbols of war. According to the artist, these works reflect the myopic view of the Bush administration that resulted in miscalculations and misrepresentations. The artist has also created an outdoor installation of a bed of artificial flowers arranged in the shape of an AK-47. The layering of flowers and military imagery calls to mind the idea of public memorials, and juxtaposes material associated with pleasure and materials associated with war. Amy Wilson Wilson’s work borrows texts from both right- and left-leaning political sources along with the artist’s journal entries, arranged as an ongoing narrative. She also incorporates imagery from newspaper cartoons of the 1800s and early 1900s, and figures that recall outsider art. She has observed that most viewers skim the texts in a way similar to watching television news. The subjective leanings of the viewer often color the meaning of the work. Cheryl Yun Yun is interested in how we, as a consumerist society, try to meet our spiritual and emotional needs by purchasing goods we think we need. The Cheryl Yun Collection is a presentation of image-based lingerie and handbags fashioned from newspaper photographs. Yun scans and manipulates images to create a rich visual “fabric.” The objects simultaneously mirror and subvert fashion and consumer culture. She displays her “products” in an installation that replicates a retail space.
|
   
joel dranove
Citizen Username: Jdranove
Post Number: 499 Registered: 1-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:29 pm: |
|
It must be great to have so much time, combined with the ability to cut and paste descriptions of speech masquerading as art. jd |
   
Dave
Supporter Username: Dave
Post Number: 9555 Registered: 4-1997

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:31 pm: |
|
At least you have to admit to wanting a chair made out of Star-Ledger back issues. Who wouldn't? |
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3204 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 12:36 pm: |
|
What art is not speech? |
   
Nicky D
Citizen Username: Nickynewark
Post Number: 2 Registered: 5-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 2:26 pm: |
|
I can not believe this thing is going to be on the hill for Memorial Day. I guess the Village is not getting enough bad press. We need AK-47 art supported by the Village to go with our recent shooting. It looks like we support guns in the city. Yes, I know just a coincident. |
   
FlyingSpaghettiMonst
Citizen Username: Noodlyappendage
Post Number: 150 Registered: 11-2005

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 3:49 pm: |
|
I am sure that the Gang member saw the art representation, went out and got a gun and decided to shoot his nemesis. |
   
Nicky D
Citizen Username: Nickynewark
Post Number: 3 Registered: 5-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 7:04 pm: |
|
That's right Spaghetti Head. Guns are not only used in war they are also used on our streets and that is a huge problem. Seeing representations of automatic weapons in such a public place on such a large scale only helps to desensitize us to the use of guns on our streets. |
   
Just The Aunt
Supporter Username: Auntof13
Post Number: 5130 Registered: 1-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - 8:28 pm: |
|
It seems Trustee Abrams agains the display on the hill should not be there. For all of you totting 'it's art' bologna. Would you say the same if some really bad group of people wanted to 'make a statement' with art of thier own? And I am talking about groups of people I am sure most people woud find offensive... |