| Author |
Message |
    
Jelly
Citizen
Username: Jelly
Post Number: 22
Registered: 10-2005
| | Posted on Saturday, March 11, 2006 - 9:48 am: | 
|
Which nail salon in Maplewood would you recommend? |
WendyP
Citizen
Username: Meandtheboys
Post Number: 3201
Registered: 12-2004
| | Posted on Saturday, March 11, 2006 - 11:04 am: |
|
Leo or Kim's are both good. Kim's tends to be a bit more crowded and you run a bigger risk of having to wait. Leo is less crowded and I find they are more attentive to their customers, simply because they have the time. Granted, I haven't had a nail painted since last fall, and I understand Leo's has changed hands.
Don't think you can go wrong with either one.
I would not recommend Nail House, unless things have change drastically over the last few months. |
ess
Citizen
Username: Ess
Post Number: 1355
Registered: 11-2001
| | Posted on Saturday, March 11, 2006 - 11:12 am: |
|
After going to Kim's only for about 4 years, I now prefer Leo. They do a better manicure and are more attentive. I feel as if there is less of a rush. Perhaps they have more time because they are not as crowded, but even when there has been a wait, I never felt rushed.
Nevertheless, either Kim's or Leo is just fine.
I agree with WendyP's non-recommendation of Nail House. |
Virtual It Girl
Citizen
Username: Shh
Post Number: 4145
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Saturday, March 11, 2006 - 11:39 am: |
|
I had a pleasant manicure and pedicure at Leo this week. I agree with what Ess says, the last few times I was at Kim's I got rushed, seemingly inexperienced service.
Danny at Leo has given me good pedicures, he seems to have the foot massage down really well. This week he was not there and Rosa did it, I liked how she shaped my toenails. (I have tricky big toes.)
Also, Maryanne at Chelsea Set really does give awesome pedicures. She is a true expert. |
|
Closed: New threads not accepted on this page