A great moment in Comcast tech support Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Technology & The Internet » Archive through August 14, 2006 » A great moment in Comcast tech support « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5368
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Saturday, July 29, 2006 - 10:37 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

After this morning's power failure, I haven't been able to connect to my usual Comcast mail server using the OSX Mail client. So I send them a message:


Quote:

Is the local mail server down? I can't connect except through web
mail. Thanks.




Some four hours later I get back:


Quote:

Thank you for contacting Comcast, my name is xxxxxxx.

I understand you received an e-mail asking you for your account information.
The message you refer to is fraudulent and is not an official Comcast e-mail.
You should not respond to the e-mail. If you thought the message was a
legitimate Comcast e-mail and replied with the requested personal information,
contact your bank or Credit Card Company.




Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Monster©
Supporter
Username: Monster


Post Number: 4270
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Saturday, July 29, 2006 - 11:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

insert long sigh <here>
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15172
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 9:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I recently read a story about someone using the vendor's IM facility for tech support. It turned out to be based on Eliza, the AI psychotherapist. This comcast emailer sounds no better.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5369
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 11:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Maybe worse. I solved the problem independently, but in the meanwhile I'd followed up on their first response. I wrote:

Quote:

Dear xxxxxxx [as if it were a real name anyway],

Why would you think, from the message I sent, that I received a fraudulent e-mail?

My problem is not even remotely that. It's that I can't connect to my comcast.net mail server. I've always connected to a server just called "mail" using the Mac "Mail" client [emphasis added], and it's not responding. I can only get my e-mail through this web-mail tool.

Setting the server as mail.comcast.net doesn't work either.

Maybe there's a DNS issue. Can you please look into THIS problem? Thanks so much.

Tom



They responded with this:

Quote:

Dear Tom,


Thank you for your message concerning the Comcast High-Speed Internet service.

I believe the issue you are experiencing with your e-mail is due to incorrect settings in Outlook Express. I have included the steps for checking these settings below, as well as a link to our help site that contains the same instructions with helpful, easy-to-understand illustrations.

Please click on this link to view the detailed instructions with graphical illustrations: http://www.comcast.net/help/faq/index.jsp?faq=EmailOutlook_Express17739&CM.src=e supm

Or if you prefer you can follow these step-by-step instructions:

To verify the settings in Outlook Express 6.0 using a Windows Operating System:



Followed by a 20-step process, including setting the POP server to mail.comcast.net -- which I'd already told them didn't work. I've responded with this:

Quote:

Dearest xxxxxx2:

Do human beings read these messages, or is this just an auto-response from a piece of software?

I've solved the problem independently, but please note that I said I'm using a Mac, and the OSX "Mail" client. Not a Windows Operating System, and not Outlook Express 6.0.

No response necessary, I'd just take it as further evidence that I need to tie up your phone lines next time.

Best,

Tom


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

composerjohn
Citizen
Username: Composerjohn


Post Number: 943
Registered: 8-2004


Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 12:28 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

BOOYAH! Take that Comcast!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Glock 17
Citizen
Username: Glock17

Post Number: 1635
Registered: 7-2005


Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 12:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

And this is why you get Optimum Online from Cablevision. Always reliable.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Monster©
Supporter
Username: Monster


Post Number: 4276
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 1:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Can't get it in Maplewood
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15174
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 5:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't like any mail service that comes bundled with internet connectivity. comcast sounds bad, but verizon has got to be worse. Get gmail or pay for email service.

By the way, tom, what was the solution?

With the problem you had, I would have opened a terminal window and done

ping mail.comcast.net

and also

telnet mail.comcast.net 110

The latter would have opened a raw POP connection, or tried to, anyway.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5377
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 6:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

pinging mail.comcast.net worked, the server was there; but I couldn't connect to it with the mail client. I've tried telnetting to that server before, but the telnet service is turned off.

The solution was to turn everything off, let it sit a few minutes, then turn on the cable modem. When it was up, turn on the router. When that was up, boot the computer. I had a feeling that was going to be the solution in the first place, but I had a lot of things open and didn't feel like shutting it all down,
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15175
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 9:46 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I appended "110" to the telnet command above. That allows you to have a raw POP conversation. You would type the commands that your mailer normally send. Type "help" for a list of commands. Practice doing this before you have your next problem.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5382
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 30, 2006 - 9:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

right you are -- thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

TarPit Coder
Citizen
Username: Tarpitcoder

Post Number: 103
Registered: 12-2004


Posted on Tuesday, August 1, 2006 - 8:21 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

LOL - TomR you debug this stuff like I tend to... Telnet to the port and have a conversation. I'm convinced that the human readable interface is one reason that many internet protocols took off like SMTP vs OSI ones. Anyone who has done any serious stuff with ASN.1 knows what I am talking about.

I've always been a strong believer in plain text configuration you can at least cat/grep vs unique custom binary formats. I guess this is why XML has become so popular. Text files with easy generation/parsing.

--tarp

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration