Worst Tech Products of All Time Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search | Who's Online
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » Technology & The Internet » Worst Tech Products of All Time « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10721
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 11:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

AOL at the top, then RealPlayer. Microsoft Millennium at #4.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,125772-page,2/article.html
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Monster©
Supporter
Username: Monster


Post Number: 4775
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 11:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10724
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Tuesday, September 5, 2006 - 11:35 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

URLs with commas suck.

http://tinyurl.com/ozy88
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5739
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - 12:07 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

IE6 ... of all the crappy pieces of software this one is still ubiquitous five years later.

Do you think that maybe, just maybe, if the antitrust suit had played out that Microsoft would have had to maybe get up to, oh, version 7 by now? Or, at the rate that competition was driving the market before they waxed Netscape, version 11?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Monster©
Supporter
Username: Monster


Post Number: 4777
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - 2:52 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have IE 7 http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15562
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - 7:34 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That's a really great list, and well told.

IE7 has been out for a while. It might still be in beta. I recommend against it. There is no way to downgrade if you change your mind.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5743
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - 8:17 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You're right, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx advertises it as "Release Candidate 1". Not something I'd want to develop against.

But 7 has these radical new concepts: tabbed browsing; integrated RSS; search boxes; and security features (any kind of security would be a relief). Maybe version 8 will offer "skins."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave
Supporter
Username: Dave


Post Number: 10726
Registered: 4-1997


Posted on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - 9:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tabbed browsing, rss and search boxes. Woohoo! Let's party like it's 1999.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ligeti Man Meat
Citizen
Username: Ligeti

Post Number: 796
Registered: 7-2002


Posted on Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - 9:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Cell phones.
Blackberries.
Wide screen TVs. Aspect ratio way off. Bigger is not better. Anthony Perkins is not supposed to have a fat face.
Radios with digital tuners instead of dials. Less equals less.
Bagless vacuums. Fortunately, these toxic devices are being phased out. I can whip them all with a vintage Hoover.
Digital watches no one can figure out.
Useless GPS devices that conventional paper folding maps simply blow away.
Those silly blinking blue headsets that Type A men strap onto their ears. They look like water bugs.
Internet. Just look at how lazy and distractable our culture has become. 5 seconds into anything, we lose focus. Books are much better.
TVs in SUVs.


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jason
Citizen
Username: Jason

Post Number: 178
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Thursday, September 7, 2006 - 1:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'm going to go old school here - worst gadget of all time, check out the flashback on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shJqIiNl5HU

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

argon_smythe
Citizen
Username: Argon_smythe

Post Number: 935
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, September 7, 2006 - 2:41 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That doesn't look all that bad actually, assuming it didn't destroy the records. Totally dig the party girls too.

How about The Clapper?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Jason
Citizen
Username: Jason

Post Number: 180
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Thursday, September 7, 2006 - 2:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

... you hit exactly the issue with the record cleaner. Far from cleaning records, it has a reputation for destroying your favorite LPs. Of course, it was easy-to-use :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 5780
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Friday, September 8, 2006 - 12:11 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

No wonder, the way the talent manhandles LPs in the commercial. That hipster in the turtleneck made me almost scream towards the end. His LP had no dust jacket, he grabbed the face of it with his fingers instead of holding it by the label or edges, and he CRAMMED the album in at an angle, probably scratching the hell out of the one side. Why bother cleaning it if you're going to wreck it before you even turn on the machine?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

TarPit Coder
Citizen
Username: Tarpitcoder

Post Number: 132
Registered: 12-2004


Posted on Sunday, September 10, 2006 - 6:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Kinda disagree with quite a few of the choices. AOL as #1 is stupid IMHO. Nobody forced you to use AOL. It was a choice. Did AOL mess up in terms of missing opportunity - absolutely.

But did anyone here try MSN when it first came out over dialup? It took minutes to even get to the home page...

--Tarp
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Case
Citizen
Username: Case

Post Number: 1930
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Sunday, September 10, 2006 - 7:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

GEnie was even worse. But let's be honest: AOL blows goats.

And I'd like to state categorically and for the record that if anyone out there enjoys carnal knowledge of goats, I acknowledge that it is their own life choice and no one's business but their own.

And the goat's, I guess.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold
Supporter
Username: Noglider


Post Number: 15640
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Sunday, September 10, 2006 - 10:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I agree about AOL, but for people who have little aptitude for learning how to use computers, no one else comes close. I cannot recommend to some people that they switch away from AOL, as bad as it is, for all the reasons stated above.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rastro
Citizen
Username: Rastro


Post Number: 3806
Registered: 5-2004


Posted on Monday, September 11, 2006 - 9:24 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The one that I disagree with is CueCat. How else could one get a free easily hackable bar code scanner?

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
Posting on this message board requires a password. To get an account, use the register link at the top of the page.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration