Archive through February 19, 2004 Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » 2004 Attic » Soapbox » Archive through April 1, 2004 » Mel Gibson insight » Archive through February 19, 2004 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Citizen
Username: Themp

Post Number: 511
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Monday, February 16, 2004 - 10:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Watched the interview. Now I get it: he's completely crazy! Sweaty, nervous, let his teeth go, etc.

Very uncomfortable experience watching the show.

Were his father's beliefs "off the table" as a condition of the interview?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

thegoodsgt
Citizen
Username: Thegoodsgt

Post Number: 385
Registered: 2-2002
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 9:09 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I thought Gibson handled himself incredibly well, even though he did seem a bit excitable. I was very impressed with his straightforward answers to Diane Sawyer's questions. He makes no excuses for his beliefs.

I don't think his father's beliefs were "off the table," as he did spend quite a bit of time talking about him, but in all fairness I don't think his father's opinions are relevant. I love my mother, but I wouldn't want her opinion of my work to affect the way my work is received by those who "consume" it. Although she raised me, I can't say that I share all of her views and opinions.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

gozerbrown
Citizen
Username: Gozerbrown

Post Number: 352
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 10:00 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I also think that Mel handled himself very well. I watched the editing closely of the interview to be sure that they didn't piece together things to make him look like a bad guy. I think his answers were informed and concise.

In terms of how he looks, he appears to have changed his priorities in life. He said he found himself comfortable behind the camera somewhat due to the fact that he didn't have to worry about what he looks like. I didn't think he was unreasonably nervous or sweaty. He disclosed a lot of stuff in that interview that would make anyone nervous and sweaty.

In terms of his look, he looks better than most men in their fifties. (And for a director, he looks better than Peter Jackson!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lumpynose
Citizen
Username: Lumpyhead

Post Number: 707
Registered: 3-2002


Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 10:52 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I thought he was very straightforward. His belief in the bible word for word was a bit strange but other than that, he was charmingly honest. If he was a devout Muslim, the press would cow tow to him and "respect" his beliefs but because he is a devout Roman Catholic, you just know they are smirking and thinking how stupid he is.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Citizen
Username: Themp

Post Number: 513
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 11:05 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"If he was a devout Muslim, the press would cow tow to him and "respect" his beliefs but because he is a devout Roman Catholic, you just know they are smirking and thinking how stupid he is. "

The press overlooks controversies involving possible Muslim anti-semitism? Give me an example.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lumpynose
Citizen
Username: Lumpyhead

Post Number: 708
Registered: 3-2002


Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 11:31 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It has not been established that the film is anti-semitic even by Jewish leaders. I was always taught that Poncious Pilot ordered the execution of Jesus, so does the film
depict all Romans as evil? I liked his reference to Shindler's List as well. He doesn't hate Germans because of what happened in the past, history is history. You can't change the facts not to insult someone or make them feel bad. When asked who killed Jesus, his answer was "all of us", meaning mankind etc...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cato Nova
Citizen
Username: Cato_nova

Post Number: 53
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 1:32 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gibson is not a devout Catholic. He is a member of a splinter sect that thinks the Church has gone seriously astray.

Oh, and it is "kowtow" not "cow tow."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ashear
Citizen
Username: Ashear

Post Number: 981
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 1:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Lumpy - did you read this post on another thread: http://www.southorangevillage.com/cgi-bin/show.cgi?tpc=26018&post=199645#POST199 645

sounds pretty anti-semetic to me. Its amazing Straw has not called Gibson a Nazi yet.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lumpynose
Citizen
Username: Lumpyhead

Post Number: 709
Registered: 3-2002


Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 2:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ash- I will have to see the movie myself to make my own determination, not listen to someone else's. Watching the interview I don't believe Gibson to be anti-semetic. In any case, it is his artistic interpretation of the events and his right given freedom of speech.

It's a good thing that American Germans never argued about the depiction of Germans in "Hogan's Heroes". :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Cato Nova
Citizen
Username: Cato_nova

Post Number: 55
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 2:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Anti-semitic. Not semetic. And let's not get started about "Hogan's Heroes" the first concentration camp comedy where the Nuremberg defense is a comedy line.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lumpynose
Citizen
Username: Lumpyhead

Post Number: 710
Registered: 3-2002


Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 2:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Cato- You could spend all day correcting spelling on MOL but it won't detract from someone's point of view. Did you see the movie?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

anon
Citizen
Username: Anon

Post Number: 989
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 11:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Others besides Gibson were interviewed on the show. Abe Foxman said that he did not believe that Gibson is an anti-semite, and I consider Foxman a leading expert in that area.

I was especially impressed by the ex-priest with the slight Irish accent whose criticism of the movie was that it never explained why Jesus was persecuted. He said that the proverbial "man from Mars" would ask "Hey, why did everyone hate this guy?" In that respect I'd be interested in the reaction of people who have no previous knowledge or opinions about Jesus or the crucification, for example, a group of Hindus. What would be their reaction?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

anon
Citizen
Username: Anon

Post Number: 990
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 11:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

And by the way, "Schindler's List" was not anti-German, it was about a German, in fact a Nazi Party member, who went out of his way to save Jews!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

themp
Citizen
Username: Themp

Post Number: 516
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004 - 11:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Still waiting for the example of overlooked Muslim ant-semitic controversy in mainstream press.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lizziecat
Citizen
Username: Lizziecat

Post Number: 161
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 - 12:06 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Schindler's List was published as fiction, and is classified as fiction by the U.S. Library of Congress.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lumpynose
Citizen
Username: Lumpyhead

Post Number: 713
Registered: 3-2002


Posted on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 - 10:42 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I don't believe the film to be "anti-semitic" in the first place but I need to see it first. There are reporters and people on this board who are sympathetic to the Palestinians who I think are overtly anti-semitic (the Palestinians that is). I guess these people think they are justified but I don't.

PS You spelled anti-semitic wrong.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

anon
Citizen
Username: Anon

Post Number: 992
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Thursday, February 19, 2004 - 9:11 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Lizzie: What is your point? Schindler was a real person and the story is based on fact. Perhaps the book and movie were "fictionalized".
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bobk
Supporter
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 4708
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, February 19, 2004 - 9:33 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gibson is a member of Traditional Catholicsim, a splinter group that rejects virtually all of the reforms instituted at Vatican II back in the 1970s. I am not sure that the Catholic dogma that the Jews killed Christ was changed then or prior to that.

However, I know that this was regularly taught in at least some Catholic schools in the 1950s, based on a incident I was involved with as a kid.

For the record I am neither Catholic or Jewish.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lizziecat
Citizen
Username: Lizziecat

Post Number: 163
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 19, 2004 - 9:40 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Schindler may very well have been a real person. I don't know that for certain. However, the book, and by extension, the movie are at best fiction based upon fact, and should not be accepted unquestioningly as true.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

ashear
Citizen
Username: Ashear

Post Number: 984
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, February 19, 2004 - 10:12 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oskar Schindler was quite real. Yad Vashem, the Holocaust memorial and museum in Jersualem, includes him as one of the "Righteous Among the Nations." This is a designation applied to non-Jews who aided Jews during the Holocaust. Info on Schindler can be found here: http://www.yad-vashem.org.il/righteous/index_schindler.html

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration