Author |
Message |
   
Dave
Moderator Username: Dave
Post Number: 5007 Registered: 4-1998

| Posted on Tuesday, January 18, 2005 - 11:31 pm: |
|
If you spent $15 million on a piece of software, wouldn't you use it more than 25 times in three years?
quote: FBI cuts Carnivore Internet probe WASHINGTON (AP) -- The FBI has effectively abandoned its custom-built Internet surveillance technology, once known as Carnivore, designed to read e-mails and other online communications among suspected criminals, terrorists and spies, according to bureau oversight reports submitted to Congress. Instead, the FBI said it has switched to unspecified commercial software to eavesdrop on computer traffic during such investigations and has increasingly asked Internet providers to conduct wiretaps on targeted customers on the government's behalf, reimbursing companies for their costs. The FBI performed only eight Internet wiretaps in fiscal 2003 and five in fiscal 2002; none used the software initially called Carnivore and later renamed the DCS-1000, according to FBI documents submitted to Senate and House oversight committees. The FBI, which once said Carnivore was "far better" than commercial products, said previously it had used the technology about 25 times between 1998 and 2000. The FBI said it could not disclose how much it spent to produce the surveillance software it no longer uses, saying part of its budget was classified. Outside experts said the government probably spent between $6 million and $15 million.
Ah, the war on terror. Those were the days. |
   
Dave
Moderator Username: Dave
Post Number: 5073 Registered: 4-1998

| Posted on Sunday, January 23, 2005 - 12:40 am: |
|
A bad budget cut right here. http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/01/21/hubble.funding/index.html |
   
argon_smythe
Citizen Username: Argon_smythe
Post Number: 516 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Sunday, January 23, 2005 - 9:14 am: |
|
Anyone who understands the technology that comprises the foundation of the internet knew from the beginning this was a boondoggle in the making. Somebody did a great sales job, though, I'll give them that. What a shame about the Hubble. Such a valuable tool. Then again arguably the things we see through it tend to go against a biblical interpretation of the creation of the universe, so it's understandable it might not be the highest priority item of this administration. . A big bloated manned mission to Mars makes far more sense (wait was that ever mentioned again?)!
|
   
Albatross
Citizen Username: Albatross
Post Number: 452 Registered: 9-2004

| Posted on Sunday, January 23, 2005 - 12:20 pm: |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/23/science/space/23hubble.html?oref=login From this it looks like the administration hasn't given up on the Mars mission. Why does it make sense to abandon a successful project while simultaneously pushing for a new, untested one? It's not as if the Hubble has outlived its usefulness. |
|