Author |
Message |
   
Face
Citizen Username: Face
Post Number: 494 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 9:37 am: |
|
As is so frequently true this "Typical Hypocrite," like Rosie O'Donnel, seems to have a seperate set of rules that apply. What's wrong Mike? Can't you afford to hire a guard that follows the laws regarding guns? http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,12010009%255E2703, 00.html What's also interesting is that main stream media isn't on top of this "man bites dog" story. |
   
Earlster
Supporter Username: Earlster
Post Number: 883 Registered: 8-2003

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 9:45 am: |
|
Did you even read the article? Or just the headline. This is a for hire bodyguard, working for an agency, who traveled with Moore to New York a month ago. Moore was not there at the airport and this is not his personal bodyguard, but somebody who was assigned to him a while ago. BORING. I heard about this on the radio yesterday morning, so it is in the mainstream media, but because it has no legs it's sure isn't big. Especially on inauguration day. |
   
Robert Livingston
Citizen Username: Rob_livingston
Post Number: 730 Registered: 7-2004
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 9:46 am: |
|
Face: do you not read, or do you not understand. Michael Moore isn't in any gun trouble as the title of your thread suggests. His bodyguard is. Unless Moore claims complete control of all his hired help's doings... As for the mainstream media...don't cha think the inauguration, looming Iraq elections, tsunami aftermath...well, nevermind...
|
   
newone
Citizen Username: Newone
Post Number: 192 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 9:50 am: |
|
It's typical of the "anti's" (not just guns) - I don't believe you should be allowed to..fill in the blank...but it's OK for me. Plus it's pretty stupid not checking local laws. He (the bodyguard) should have known better and deserves arrest. |
   
Robert Livingston
Citizen Username: Rob_livingston
Post Number: 732 Registered: 7-2004
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 9:55 am: |
|
"He (the bodyguard) should have known better and deserves arrest." Very true. Tying this directly with Moore is wishful thinking on the part of the insufferable, supposed ruling party, the sorest bunch of winners this side of Yankee fans. |
   
Ukealalio
Citizen Username: Ukealalio
Post Number: 1743 Registered: 6-2003
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 9:57 am: |
|
There seems to be a wide spread comprehension problem on the right of epidemic proportions. |
   
Nohero
Citizen Username: Nohero
Post Number: 4264 Registered: 10-1999

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:05 am: |
|
Face relied on a story from Rupert Murdoch's Australian paper. It just goes to show that you shouldn't trust Fox news, or any of its cousins. I don't know if New York Newsday counts as "mainstream media" for you guys, but here's a news story with more information: quote:NEW YORK -- A bodyguard who has protected outspoken moviemaker and gun control advocate Michael Moore was arrested at John F. Kennedy International Airport for carrying a pistol without a New York license, authorities said Thursday. The bodyguard, Patrick Burk, was questioned by Port Authority police Wednesday night after he notified a United Airlines ticket agent that he wanted to carry his weapon _ unloaded and in a bag _ on a flight to Los Angeles, Port Authority spokesman Tony Ciavolella said. Burk, 34, was arraigned Thursday evening in Queens on a felony charge of criminal possession of a weapon and was released on his own recognizance, Queens district attorney's office spokesman Patrick Clark said. A return court date was set for Feb. 3. Burk's attorney, Marc Greenwald, said his client "was following proper airline procedures when he was checking in and informed the airline that he had an unloaded and locked weapon in his checked baggage, which he is entitled to do." Moore spokesman Mark Benoit said the filmmaker "wasn't there and had nothing do with this." The bodyguard, who works for the California-based security firm Gavin de Becker & Associates, told police he had traveled to New York with Moore earlier this month, Ciavolella said. He produced licenses for his Mauser handgun from California and Florida but not New York, which prompted his arrest. Burk has been assigned to protect Moore in the past but is not his personal bodyguard, Gavin de Becker said in a statement. De Becker defended Burk, saying he had followed proper procedures at the airport. He called him "a leading professional in his field."
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/state/ny-bc-ny--moviemaker-bodygu0120jan20,0,1 482278.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork I "bolded" some parts, just to point out some facts which may have been missed elsewhere. Okay, carry on. |
   
newone
Citizen Username: Newone
Post Number: 194 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:14 am: |
|
I have to agree-as much as I can't stand Michael Moore, this really has nothing to do with him. Guilt by association. Now a huge hypocrite is Sen. Feinstein of California. Extremely anti-gun yet she has her own concealed weapon permit. |
   
Bobkat
Supporter Username: Bobk
Post Number: 7296 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:19 am: |
|
This is mildly amusing in that it shows that Moore uses armed bodyguards in spite of his anti-gun views. Still he is controversial enough to probably need the protection. State gun laws are confusing and what happened to Burk is fairly common. NJ is very tough on this, even with out of state cops. More than one out of state policeman has been arrested here for carrying. |
   
Strings
Supporter Username: Blue_eyes
Post Number: 330 Registered: 4-2004

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:24 am: |
|
I literally laughed out loud - this has nothing to do with Michael Moore. Good one, Face!! And it's an Associated Press story! (Isn't that what the "AP" under the headline means?) That's not "main stream media"? |
   
jerkyboy
Citizen Username: Jerkyboy
Post Number: 49 Registered: 12-2004
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:30 am: |
|
Did anyone see "Bowling for Columbine?" michael moore-on, what a hypocritical jack***! |
   
Earlster
Supporter Username: Earlster
Post Number: 885 Registered: 8-2003

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:35 am: |
|
The one misconsception about Moore is, that he is not completely anti gun, but wants more controls. And whoever watched Bowling for Columbine also knows that he has thought about this topic quite a lot, and doesn't just see it black and white. |
   
Earlster
Supporter Username: Earlster
Post Number: 886 Registered: 8-2003

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:37 am: |
|
Hey dried beef boy, did you ever watch it? All the way to the end? Doesn't seem like it. |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 1901 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:37 am: |
|
Face... there you go again. I'm wondering where there is any indication of hypocrisy on the part of (NRA member) Moore in all this. Any comment?
 |
   
court07040
Citizen Username: Court07040
Post Number: 179 Registered: 8-2003
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:39 am: |
|
I was surprised to learn Moore employs armed bodyguards. I never saw them in his documentaries. No mention in the credits, either. |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 1903 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 10:59 am: |
|
Perhaps he didn't feel a need for bodyguards until the infamy and death threats generated by F911. |
   
Robert Livingston
Citizen Username: Rob_livingston
Post Number: 733 Registered: 7-2004
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 11:06 am: |
|
It's not surprising that he would have had to start using them after F911. The truths in the movie were hard for a lot of mindless drones to comprehend. |
   
mapletop
Citizen Username: Mapletop
Post Number: 32 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 11:33 am: |
|
Moore, a scared white guy? He seems to make fun of other scared white guys, but for him it okay to be scared? (or is there another reason for the body guard) |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 1909 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 11:37 am: |
|
Mapletop, I'd bet you're trying to make a point. What is it? Still waiting to hear a little follow-up from Face about this. |
   
court07040
Citizen Username: Court07040
Post Number: 180 Registered: 8-2003
| Posted on Friday, January 21, 2005 - 12:57 pm: |
|
The guy made a couple movies, not march in Birmingham during the 60's. Do other controversal directors in Hollywood employ rent-a-cops, too? |