Droopy Drawers...from BBC news

Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post   Closed: New threads not accepted on this page

Author Message   musicme Citizen Username: Musicme Post Number: 962 Registered: 5-2001 Posted on Wednesday, February 9, 2005 - 11:08 am:        US politicians fed up with catching an eyeful of underwear want to fine those who won't hitch up their trousers. The Virginia state house has voted to outlaw the trend of wearing trousers so low that underwear hangs over the top. Delegates said the habit, popular across the US and in other Western countries, was "coarsening" society. But others hit back, urging legislators to remember their own "fashion follies" and saying the law would be used mostly against black people. The house adopted the "droopy drawers" bill by a margin of 60-34. Underwear is called underwear for a reason said Virginia Delegate John Reid If the state senate also approves, youngsters in Virginia showing too much of their boxer shorts or G-strings could be fined $50 (£26). The habit, apparently picked up from rap and skateboarding culture, has become popular among boys and girls of all races, but particularly black youngsters. Democrat Delegate Algie T Howell proposed the bill. "It's not an attack on baggy pants. It's not about Janet Jackson. It's not about Randy Moss," he said, referring to the American footballer recently fined for pretending to "moon" opposing fans. "To vote for this bill would be a vote for character, to uplift your community and to do something good not only for the state of Virginia, but for this entire country," he added. Faux pas Others were similarly offended by the current trend. "Most of us would identify this as the coarsening of society," said Delegate John Reid, a Republican. But Delegate Lionell Spruill, a Democrat, objected, calling it "a foolish bill". He asked fellow politicians to remember their own former fashion faux pas, including Afro haircuts, platform shoes and shiny polyester "shell suits". "Please, let these kids express themselves," he urged, before warning there could be a sinister side to the bill. "This is going to be a bill that targets blacks. You know who they are going to stop," he said.   Earlster Supporter Username: Earlster Post Number: 964 Registered: 8-2003 Posted on Wednesday, February 9, 2005 - 11:19 am:        Wouldn't want to be plumber down there in Virginia.   Bill P Citizen Username: Mrincredible Post Number: 25 Registered: 1-2005 Posted on Wednesday, February 9, 2005 - 11:25 am:        I think this is simply part of a trend in politics of introducing a bill that sure sounds great but isn't going to accomplish a heck of a lot. I can't give too many examples without getting controversial, but this is just another bill that a politician can vote for and say he's standing up for a moral society.   Chris Prenovost Citizen Username: Chris_prenovost Post Number: 320 Registered: 7-2003 Posted on Wednesday, February 9, 2005 - 11:54 am:        Very well put, Bill P. Another useless law that will not solve a thing. Cheap political theater. And another way for the BBC to make fun of Americans.   Mark Fuhrman Citizen Username: Mfpark Post Number: 1264 Registered: 9-2001 Posted on Wednesday, February 9, 2005 - 1:00 pm:        Yes, Bill and Chris, and also another example of politicians trying to legislate personal taste and behavior. Jeesh, in my days, real conservatives believed government should keep out of personal business as much as possible.