Pope Says Gay Marriage Part of "Ideol... Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » 2005 Attic » Soapbox: All Politics » Archive through March 14, 2005 » Pope Says Gay Marriage Part of "Ideology of Evil" « Previous Next »

  Thread Originator Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through February 24, 2005Robert LivingstonRastro20 2-24-05  2:35 pm
  ClosedClosed: New threads not accepted on this page          

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

maplewood fan
Citizen
Username: Mplwfan

Post Number: 148
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 4:40 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Why is the man with the title of pope so eager to use Modern Medicine to stay alive - shouldn't he be eager to meet his lord and saviour? As far as his position on Gay Marriage it's worth about as much to me as his position on anything else - ZERO!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Strawman
Supporter
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 4588
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 5:02 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

shut up...what a stupid thing to say...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Prenovost
Citizen
Username: Chris_prenovost

Post Number: 359
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 5:04 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A couple of points. . .

Bash the Pope all you want over gay marriage, but remember all the good he has done, starting with his role in the collapse of communism. Without bloodshed, I might add.

And be careful what you wish for. If he dies, Cardinal Ratzinger is well placed to succeed him. And Ratzinger maker Pope John Paul II look like a left wing euro-weenie. The universal church is not full of starry-eyed reformers.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walker
Citizen
Username: Fester

Post Number: 67
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 5:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

He is still the head of an organization that by their own actions have effectively condoned the rape of children around the world by their own representatives. That completely negates any good either he or the organization have done.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Innisowen
Citizen
Username: Innisowen

Post Number: 513
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 5:22 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Chris:

I'd lay odds that the next time the College of Cardinals sends out the smoke and says "Habemus papam," the college will have elected someone from South or Central America, Africa, or Asia... Ratzinger and other Europeans and Americans will work the politics, and a pope from the most populous and heretofore neglected parts of the world will work the crowd...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bettina
Citizen
Username: Bettina

Post Number: 34
Registered: 8-2004
Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 6:05 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Re: "bash the pope all you want over gay marriage". How are we bashing him because we're disagreeing with a position which we, well I, deem harmful to a large segment of the population? I would guess gays might feel "bashed" by having their desires to be treated like human beings likened to an "ideology of evil". Please.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

sbenois
Citizen
Username: Sbenois

Post Number: 13252
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 10:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well I'm going to be saying a little private prayer for his speedy recovery regardless of his positions on various issues.

He is the leader of the Catholic Church and he deserves respect.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Montagnard
Citizen
Username: Montagnard

Post Number: 1437
Registered: 6-2003


Posted on Thursday, February 24, 2005 - 10:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's a shame he has to end his life on such a bizarre and irrational note.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

CFA
Citizen
Username: Cfa

Post Number: 1308
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 4:02 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sbenois,

You're absolutely correct, he does deserve respect, but so do I.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

maplewood fan
Citizen
Username: Mplwfan

Post Number: 149
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 10:38 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

PULL THE PLUG!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

overtaxdalready
Citizen
Username: Overtaxdalready

Post Number: 351
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 11:51 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hey Maplewood "fan"...do you put "be stupid" at the top of your to-do list each and every day?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walker
Citizen
Username: Fester

Post Number: 68
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 11:54 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Respect is earned not deserved, anything he has done to earn respect has been canceled out by the of the rape of children on his watch.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Chris Prenovost
Citizen
Username: Chris_prenovost

Post Number: 360
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 12:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Innisowen, Walker & Bettina:

In no way am I condoning the Pope's attempts to shove the pedophilia issues under the rug. Nor am I defending his defense of indefensible positions. I am merely saying that we need to look at the big picture.

People slam President Clinton as the antichrist because he is arguably the most corrupt President in the history of the Republic. But he left us at peace, with a healthy economy, and a budget surplus to boot.

Look at both sides of the ledger. And I hope you will concur that he has been a pretty good pope, certain issues notwithstanding.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Guy
Supporter
Username: Vandalay

Post Number: 564
Registered: 8-2004
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 12:18 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Walker, if that is your position on the Pope, I shudder to think what you feel should be done with Kofi Annan. Children were raped on his watch also.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walker
Citizen
Username: Fester

Post Number: 69
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 12:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Those who perpetrate theses crimes against children and those who assist them in covering up these crimes either to protect the perpetrator or to protect the organization the perpetrator belongs to should be punished to the full extent of the law, regardless of their position.

What makes the Popes position more precarious than Kofi’s is that this has been going on unchecked it the Catholic church for generations with nothing or very little being done to prevent it and from where I stand at least for no other reason than to protect their image. At least the UN have launched an investigation and the offending people are being brought up on charges. The Catholic churches response in most cases is to move the perpetrator to another parish.

Even after the scandal broke they persist in these practices.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

mjc
Citizen
Username: Mjc

Post Number: 292
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 12:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I see John Paul in heaven standing in front of Jesus. Jesus has his hands on his hips and looks stern. John Paul is slapping himself on the forehead and saying Oh! I didn't get what you wanted me to do for gays!

I'm sure I'll be slapping my forehead about a LOT of stuff, if I'm privileged to arrive there. John Paul IMHO has a lot on the positive side of his ledger, including as noted above a share of the credit for freedom in eastern Europe, plus concern for economic justice, plus one of my all-time favorite photos, of him visiting in prison the young man who shot him. Not a perfect score; in some areas, including his outlook on women and gays, he's remained a product of his generation and upbringing, leaving a lot of us grinding our teeth.

As for the crimes against children, no excuses for those who tried to sweep the scandals under the rug, they deserve all the disgrace that can be heaped on them, along with criminal convictions where warranted; but is John Paul among them?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walker
Citizen
Username: Fester

Post Number: 70
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 12:52 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

How is he not he is the head of the organization that has allowed this to continue. By his inaction he has implicated himself. There are no excuses.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Guy
Supporter
Username: Vandalay

Post Number: 565
Registered: 8-2004
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 1:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Walker, if this has been going on for generations, Pope John Paul is the first Pope to lay down a policy against it. This abuse happened in my own parish with teenage boys that I knew. I always felt that the Bishops in the Achdiocese were the real problem. The priest was merely transfered. Tough to say how much of these actions the Pope actually knew about.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

wharfrat
Citizen
Username: Wharfrat

Post Number: 1610
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 1:32 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

People slam President Clinton as the antichrist because he is arguably the most corrupt President in the history of the Republic.




Chris-

I always thought Nixon was the most "corrupt" President in history.

Remember "Watergate".
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Walker
Citizen
Username: Fester

Post Number: 71
Registered: 4-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 2:55 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Guy;

Anyone can put a policy in place. The church took no action to prevent further abuse of its followers children until after it became widely publicized, this from an organization that keeps very tight ranks.
To say and I quote "Tough to say how much of these actions the Pope actually knew about" is naive at best, of course he knows what is going on but lets take it a step further even if he did not have knowledge of the actions at the time why has no action been taken against those who covered it up?

This smacks of complicity all the way to the top.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sgt. Pepper
Citizen
Username: Jjkatz

Post Number: 712
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 4:12 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Chris -- come on about Clinton. They "investigated" him for 8 years and the only thing they could get him on was lying about getting a BJ.

Compare that with Nixon, Reagan (how does a BJ compare with secretly selling weapons to a terrorist country), or LBJ (who made no secret of the fact that he could be bought).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 3194
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 9:23 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sgt is right. And technically, allowing Loral Space to sell technology and advise China how to keep their nuclear warheads aloft and accurately targeted really wasn't entirely against the law, especially when clearance was moved away from national security auspices and into the Commerce Department run by Ron Brown with his trusty sidekick John Huang. That's not illegal. So Clinton's only real crime was perjury.

And about Kofi -- to say "well, at least they're conducting an investigation" -- the record shows that initial investigations by the UN CLEARED oil for food, sex harassment by Luud Rubbers in the refugee office, and I think the rapes in the Congo. It was only through repeated public pressure that re-investigations took place. Kofi was brilliant with Rwanda too. How many people did the Pope kill?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Montagnard
Citizen
Username: Montagnard

Post Number: 1442
Registered: 6-2003


Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 9:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) of women who could not obtain either birth control or safe and legal abortions.

Comfortable in his sanctimony as his victims went to their bloody and painful deaths.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 3196
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Friday, February 25, 2005 - 9:53 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Pope didn't kill any of those women.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Montagnard
Citizen
Username: Montagnard

Post Number: 1443
Registered: 6-2003


Posted on Saturday, February 26, 2005 - 1:14 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Saddam pulled no triggers. Pinochet never set foot in a prison. Lyndon Johnson dropped no napalm and Richard Nixon couldn't tell Agent Orange from a tangerine...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Sgt. Pepper
Citizen
Username: Jjkatz

Post Number: 718
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Monday, February 28, 2005 - 2:56 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Actually I think Saddam was known to pull a trigger on occasion.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration