| Author |
Message |
    
Guy
Supporter
Username: Vandalay
Post Number: 568
Registered: 8-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 8:47 am: | 
|
 |
Nohero
Citizen
Username: Nohero
Post Number: 4394
Registered: 10-1999
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:03 am: |
|
What, anybody named "Roosevelt" gets voted off the mountain?  |
bottomline
Citizen
Username: Bottomline
Post Number: 189
Registered: 8-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:08 am: |
|
I get it -- George Bush is flat while the others are three-dimensional.
Same as their leadership styles, right?
|
Guy
Supporter
Username: Vandalay
Post Number: 569
Registered: 8-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:21 am: |
|
Roosevelt got moved to Rushmore II next to Reagan.
|
Nohero
Citizen
Username: Nohero
Post Number: 4397
Registered: 10-1999
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:26 am: |
|
Why move Teddy? Just start "Rushmore II" with GWB.
Later on, you can add Reagan, Buchanan, Millard Fillmore and Warren G. Harding. |
Ukealalio
Citizen
Username: Ukealalio
Post Number: 1850
Registered: 6-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:29 am: |
|
Free thinking men of intellect, next to a lightweight clown.
When hell freezes over. |
Guy
Supporter
Username: Vandalay
Post Number: 570
Registered: 8-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:35 am: |
|
Nohero, They didn't want to have Bush and Reagan on the same mountain. The crowds would have been too large.
Uke, or when the Mideast is full of democracies.
|
Parkbench87
Citizen
Username: Parkbench87
Post Number: 1784
Registered: 7-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:41 am: |
|
"Nohero, They didn't want to have Bush and Reagan on the same mountain. The crowds would have been too large."
True, and where would they park all those trailers? |
Hank Zona
Citizen
Username: Hankzona
Post Number: 2079
Registered: 3-2002
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:43 am: |
|
the above picture...making a mountain into a molehill.
|
Guy
Supporter
Username: Vandalay
Post Number: 571
Registered: 8-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 9:48 am: |
|
Hank more like a MOL Hill |
Michael Janay
Citizen
Username: Childprotect
Post Number: 1640
Registered: 1-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 12:13 pm: |
|
I Prefer this one... Skywriting included.
Or this one:
 |
Cato Nova
Citizen
Username: Cato_nova
Post Number: 508
Registered: 12-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 1:45 pm: |
|
Regardless of whether one is a Reagan Bush fan or not, there are many who oppose any alteration to Mount Rushmore on the grounds that it is an iconic work. What crap. What kitsch. That's what happens when the hoi polloi get any power. |
sac
Supporter
Username: Sac
Post Number: 1869
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 2:17 pm: |
|
Does anyone really believe that this sort of project would even be considered in this day and age? The only possibility I can envision would be if it was done totally on private property with no public funding ... certainly not as a National Park/Monument. |
ffof
Citizen
Username: Ffof
Post Number: 3394
Registered: 5-2001
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 2:19 pm: |
|
Janay- that looks like Carter more than Reagan. Weak brow. Doesn't belong. |
Phenixrising
Citizen
Username: Phenixrising
Post Number: 456
Registered: 9-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 2:50 pm: |
|
I think Bush deserves to be represented on the mountain!
I can see the vision…
GW Bush, Moe, Curly & Larry! 
|
Ukealalio
Citizen
Username: Ukealalio
Post Number: 1851
Registered: 6-2003
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 5:49 pm: |
|
Phenixrising- How dare you insult the Howard Brothers and Mr. Fine like that!!!!!. |
Innisowen
Citizen
Username: Innisowen
Post Number: 557
Registered: 3-2004
| | Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2005 - 8:14 pm: |
|
No comment at all. |
Closed: New threads not accepted on this page