Archive through August 19, 2003 Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » The Attic (1999-2002) » Soapbox » Archive through September 6, 2003 » Liberalism Rules » Archive through August 19, 2003 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1121
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 12:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

An excerpt from Joe Conason on today's Salon (www.salon.com)


quote:

If Americans have a common fault, however, it's our tendency to suffer from historical amnesia. Too many of us have forgotten, or never learned, what kind of country America was under the conservative rule that preceded the century of liberal reform. And too many of us have no idea whose ideas and energy brought about the reforms we now take for granted.

If your workplace is safe; if your children go to school rather than being forced into labor; if you are paid a living wage, including overtime; if you enjoy a 40-hour week and you are allowed to join a union to protect your rights -- you can thank liberals. If your food is not poisoned and your water is drinkable -- you can thank liberals. If your parents are eligible for Medicare and Social Security, so they can grow old in dignity without bankrupting your family -- you can thank liberals. If our rivers are getting cleaner and our air isn't black with pollution; if our wilderness is protected and our countryside is still green -- you can thank liberals. If people of all races can share the same public facilities; if everyone has the right to vote; if couples fall in love and marry regardless of race; if we have finally begun to transcend a segregated society -- you can thank liberals. Progressive innovations like those and so many others were achieved by long, difficult struggles against entrenched power. What defined conservatism, and conservatives, was their opposition to every one of those advances. The country we know and love today was built by those victories for liberalism -- with the support of the American people.




Indisputable.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 13
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 1:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

TEddy Roosevelt -- a republican -- made our national park system. The longest filibuster in congressional history? THe Senate Democrats in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- who's last speaker was RObert "Sheets" Byrd ending 57 days of filibuster. Al Gore Sr's finest hour. THe longest one-man filibuster was STrom THurmond in the same year with 24+ hours.

PS - I have a great mutual fund. one catch - if you don't make annual contributions, you go to jail. It gives you a 2% return, and any money you need that you don't earn with your contributions they suck out of your kid's wages. And the great part - -when you die, they keep it! And you are all already in it. It's called Social Security. These same people are also running Medicare. Pssssst. They're all going broke. Ponzi lives.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

notehead
Citizen
Username: Notehead

Post Number: 662
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 1:25 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What rubbish. Any American worth a damn is entirely self-made and has nobody else to thank for their health, freedom, or lifestyle. :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1122
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 1:49 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Please don't make the mistake of using "Republican" interchangeably with "Conservative," or "Democrat" with "Liberal," especially not in an historical context.

Your S.S. metaphor breaks down when you first treat it like a mutual fund (2% return), then as an annuity (money you need that you don't earn). It's one or the other.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1123
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 1:51 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

While I'm on the subject, if there were no Social Security, and you in your old age needed extra money, where would your children get the money?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

chocoholic
Citizen
Username: Shrink

Post Number: 23
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 2:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tom,

Thanks for the post. It's about time that those of us of the "liberal " persuasion recount some of the good things that came out and come out of liberalism. And you are correct, for some reason many think that a Conservative is a Republican and and a Democrat is a Liberal. Not exactly true. My guess is that this due to Rush Limbaugh's influence.
And to the poster who mentioned the initimable Teddy Roosevelt- read Theodore REX and the Rise of Theodore Roosevelt. Good old TDR was a pretty liberal Republican and was not exactly loved by many of those in his own party. Also remember that some of the views of the Republican Party at that time were similar to todays Democrats.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 14
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 2:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

sorry -- was responding to 'liberalism' in the heading. As for mutual fund/annuity -- you're right. I should just call social security what it is -- a scam.

Without social security, I'd have more of my own money to invest at a higher rate of return. THere's one part of the country where this is possible -- Galveston, TX. It's a winner for all those enrolled, save for a few on the low-wage end making decisions that weren't aggressive enough in the early going.

By children, I meant adult children. If they couldn't help me, I'd go to a charity.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dave Ross
Supporter
Username: Dave

Post Number: 5020
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 2:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

and then there's the other definition of liberalism: "An economic theory in favor of laissez-faire, the free market, and the gold standard."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Iaowks Reingold
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 381
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 3:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

tom, you are so confused. The country's problems are that kids are not forced into labor, the environment is not free to industry to rape, and the workplace safety is a threat to profits. Can't you see how liberalism continues to destroy the country? Our country was originally founded on freedom, and these new regulations are eating away at that freedom every day. What good is compassion when it impinges on freedom, man?!

Tom Reingold


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

REBORN STRAW
Citizen
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 944
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 4:13 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

boring
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

michael
Citizen
Username: Michael

Post Number: 349
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 4:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

zzzzzzzzz...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

notehead
Citizen
Username: Notehead

Post Number: 665
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 4:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It's too bad that the ban on lead-based paint came too late to help the fruity phoenix.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1124
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 4:42 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Someone has a short attention span. Stick to the points, and try to pay attention. Unless of course you can't refute any of it!

Go on, defend child labor and segregated drinking fountains!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

newjerz
Citizen
Username: Newjerz

Post Number: 122
Registered: 5-2003


Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 5:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

It should be pointed out that we do have segregated lunch rooms and social groups even today in supposedly integrated environments (Columbia HS for example) only the segregation is voluntary by both groups.

Liberals are strong supporters the vision of America as a land of diversity rather than the vision of America as "the meltingpot". I think this is one of the reasons that long after legal segregation ended it is still practiced informally.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

zoe
Citizen
Username: Zoe

Post Number: 314
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 5:16 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

How about forced senior citizen labor and segregated high schools. That's what is developing when you consider the property taxes and social security much of our elderly will be forced to accept at retirement, so they continue to work beyond what was originally planned. Then you take a cold hard look at the "Harvey Milk" School. If that ain't just another "segregated fountain."
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

OK, it's Tom Reingold
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 383
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 5:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

As a kid, I was taught that there are no differences between people of different races. That wasn't really true. There are differences. I think they should have made the distinction between equality and equivalence. Each person is valuable to his family, friends and society. But we're not the same in our tastes, our strengths and weaknesses, our mannerism, and so many other things. We tend to fear the unknown and gravitate to the familiar. That's why kids tend to congregate in racial groups in high school. Skin color is a blatant sign of cultural differences. That's why white kids of various ethnic backgrounds hang together: they're not aware of their differences.

One reason I chose Maplewood is because of the racial diversity. I expect it to be difficult for my kids to learn to get along with different kids. And I think that difficulty will be of value to them.

But it's interesting to note that we moved from Edison, where the racial diversity is actually greater. Edison doesn't have a lot of blacks, but it has Asians from many countries, and people of many European ethnicities, immigrant and "native". However, it lacks economic diversity. It seems that Essex county has more economic diversity.

Tom Reingold


Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1125
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, August 18, 2003 - 8:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Harvey Milk school will be a "segregated fountain" when cops with firehoses and dobermans force kids to go there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

REBORN STRAW
Citizen
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 948
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - 5:43 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Edison is a dump.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

FreeTibet
Citizen
Username: Freetibet

Post Number: 14
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - 5:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

if liberalism is so great why do liberals have no power ? because only liberals love liberals and they are a dying breed.

I wish I was a liberal, but I am too logical
- Albert Einstein
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

FreeTibet
Citizen
Username: Freetibet

Post Number: 15
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - 5:48 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Q: what is more annoying than liberals not in power complaining that everything would be better run by them ?

A: Liberals in power complaining that all the problems are not their fault, but the fault of the previous party in power.

sniff, poor poor liberals !

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration