Author |
Message |
   
tjohn
Supporter Username: Tjohn
Post Number: 4691 Registered: 12-2001

| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 5:22 pm: |
|
Bush says Israel won. Hezbollah says they won. Olmert says he would have done things differently - presumably use overwhelming force from Day 1 and not dismantle so much Lebanese infrastructure. If Seymour Hersh's article is even remotely accurate, this was not a good thirty days for the Bush Administration. |
   
Factvsfiction
Citizen Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 1430 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 6:24 pm: |
|
Iranians very unhappy with the results. Their deterrent to US or Israeli action against their nuke program is pretty well beaten down. www.debka.com/article.php/aid=1201 |
   
tulip
Citizen Username: Braveheart
Post Number: 3883 Registered: 3-2004

| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 6:32 pm: |
|
Why are people talking about who won? Was it a bloody basketball game? No one wins in war. Let's talk about how not to do it again. |
   
Wendy
Supporter Username: Wendy
Post Number: 2986 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 6:35 pm: |
|
For the Jews and others who were liberated from Dachau, et al, I would think it was quite important that someone won in that war. For so many other reasons, it was quite important who won that war. |
   
tulip
Citizen Username: Braveheart
Post Number: 3884 Registered: 3-2004

| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 6:42 pm: |
|
People left standing and alive won the war. |
   
Strawberry
Supporter Username: Strawberry
Post Number: 7704 Registered: 10-2001
| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 8:28 pm: |
|
Tulip needs to stop posting. |
   
Wendy
Supporter Username: Wendy
Post Number: 2987 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 9:01 pm: |
|
Straw my man. I am not a moderate; I am a liberal. I think you were way off base in trying to label me otherwise. However, your 8:28 pm post in this thread is absolutely, 100%, drop dead correct. |
   
Factvsfiction
Citizen Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 1440 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Monday, August 14, 2006 - 10:07 pm: |
|
I concur Strawberry and Wendy. |
   
Southerner
Citizen Username: Southerner
Post Number: 1450 Registered: 2-2004
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 7:48 am: |
|
Please, please, please continue to post Tulip. Tulip represents the neo-liberal faction of the Democratic Party. If Tulip stops another one will begin. I enjoy reading her posts because they only further my cause of more conservatives winning at election time. The country is blind like most of you New Jersey/northeast posters. You have about 80 more days to point to the polls and feel good. After election day the neo-libs will see what the country thinks of them. |
   
llama
Citizen Username: Llama
Post Number: 820 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 8:46 am: |
|
Yes, we must continue to liberate Iraqis and find WMD's by bringing the fight to the terrorists so that Iraqis don't get Pakistanis to blow up planes from England in mid-air and strike us on our home soil again! If we don't go and get them first they will get us so we must not stand around doing nothing when we can be fighting or they will get us! Our foreign policies are perfect and the world must accept them because we are America the land of freedom! |
   
frannyfree
Citizen Username: Frannyfree
Post Number: 237 Registered: 1-2004
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 10:12 am: |
|
The ONLY way to achieve peace is to WIN a war! If we had not won WW2 we would still have Nazis in power today in Germany. |
   
tulip
Citizen Username: Braveheart
Post Number: 3885 Registered: 3-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 10:24 am: |
|
Peace is war, war is peace! No new taxes! Nuke Ay-ran! Libs are morons! Looney leftwing wacko nutjobs hippy greenie, tree-huggers! Boring! etc,etc, ad nauseam......
|
   
Nuff Sayid
Citizen Username: Parkingsux
Post Number: 482 Registered: 6-2005

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 10:46 am: |
|
the new Tulip, I like it..... |
   
dave23
Citizen Username: Dave23
Post Number: 1951 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 10:49 am: |
|
Down is the new up. |
   
tjohn
Supporter Username: Tjohn
Post Number: 4698 Registered: 12-2001

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 12:12 pm: |
|
"The ONLY way to achieve peace is to WIN a war! If we had not won WW2 we would still have Nazis in power today in Germany." You could have used the same argument to make the case for attacking the Soviet Union. But, Communism collapsed under its own weight (as predicted by George Kennan in the late 1940's). Now, having said that, I can't imagine on what terms one would have negotiated peaced with the Germans and the Japanese, so the demand for unconditional surrender made during the war still seems reasonable to me. |
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3724 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 3:20 pm: |
|
"The ONLY way to achieve peace is to WIN a war!" We have found the anti-Tulip. |
   
notehead
Supporter Username: Notehead
Post Number: 3718 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 4:22 pm: |
|
I think I'm going to start (and win) a war so that I can have peaceful life afterwards. |
   
The Man (est. 1904)
Citizen Username: Mapleman
Post Number: 670 Registered: 6-2004

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 4:47 pm: |
|
I understand the concept well. I like to hit myself on the head with a ball peen hammer, sometimes for hours. Because it feels SOOOOO GOOD when I stop! |
   
Factvsfiction
Citizen Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 1448 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 5:49 pm: |
|
And the 60s continue.... break out the tie-dye... |
   
Tom Reingold
Supporter Username: Noglider
Post Number: 15315 Registered: 1-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 6:23 pm: |
|
Let all sides say they won. What are you going to do, start a war to straighten the record of the last war?
|
   
anon
Supporter Username: Anon
Post Number: 3001 Registered: 6-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 9:07 pm: |
|
Tulip represents the neo-liberal faction of the Democratic Party. Tulip represents only tulip. if she is a faction, she is a faction of one. Shouldn't we be happy when a war ends with both sides winning? I'll repeat the thoughts on winners and losers of war which I posted recently in a different thread. Most people think the US lost the War in Vietnam. Well we fought that war to stop the spread of communism. Communism did not spread to the "dominoes" and a few years after the war ended, the Soviet Ubion, the patron of the Vietnamese Communists, fell apart. Today "communist" Vietnam is our buddy. I look at the cars in my driveway (and almost everyone else's driveway) and wonder who won WW11. I look at who runs America and wonder which side "won" the Civil War. Who "won" the recent hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah? We'll have to wait at least 30 years to discuss that intelligently. |
   
anon
Supporter Username: Anon
Post Number: 3002 Registered: 6-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 9:10 pm: |
|
We started this country by fighting a war to separate from Great Britain. Lots of separation these days! |
   
Southerner
Citizen Username: Southerner
Post Number: 1452 Registered: 2-2004
| Posted on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 10:47 pm: |
|
anon, Good posts. Your point is dead on. Only time will tell if the decisions made by our government since 9/11 have paid off. I think the decisions are correct which is why I gladly support Bush and the admin. I believe in the future this will be borne out. Now, let's get back to the typical whining. You libs have an election to win! |
   
mwsilva
Citizen Username: Mwsilva
Post Number: 514 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 8:16 am: |
|
Monday I saw the movie, WTC. I am still haunted by it and the memory of those days that it brought up. On that day the terrorists won. |
   
tulip
Citizen Username: Braveheart
Post Number: 3892 Registered: 3-2004

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 8:29 am: |
|
anon: Since I'm Tulip, perhaps I may respond to your post referencing me. Although I am flattered by Straw and others linking me to the mainstream of the liberal left, I admit, as you say, I am a party of one. The views I express here are neither liberal nor conservative in the classical sense. They are mine. Thanks for clarifying that. T. |
   
Southerner
Citizen Username: Southerner
Post Number: 1455 Registered: 2-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 9:33 am: |
|
Okay tulip, I thought you were above hiding behind the "party of one" line. Please. You are no different than any other poster here. You know who you have voted for in the past and it doesn't take a genius to figure out who those candidates were. You are just another typical northeast lib who believes you are so much smarter than everyone. Your unique spin to set yourself apart is the party of one crap. I don't buy it and I know you don't buy it. I just find it amazing that so many posters are afraid to say what they really are. Now tulip, please don't get mad at the messenger. You know you have continually pulled the lever for the losing candidate. Why you don't want to face it makes me chuckle. |
   
Chris Prenovost
Citizen Username: Chris_prenovost
Post Number: 1037 Registered: 7-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 10:01 am: |
|
Hezbollah won. They fired 3K+ rockets at Israel, and killed several Israeli civilians. And managed to kill dozens of Israeli soldiers when Israel invaded south Lebanon. They are being glorified in the Arab media, and Palestinian parents are naming their newborns Hezbollah and Nasrallah. They would win any election in the middle east because they 'stood up' to Israel. And the cost was paid by others. The infrastructure of Lebanon has been destroyed, the Lebanese economy is a shambles, and the grieving civilians of south Lebanon are counting their dead, while blaming Israel and the US for something that Hezbollah started. Indescribably sad. |
   
Twokitties
Citizen Username: Twokitties
Post Number: 491 Registered: 8-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 10:10 am: |
|
Chris, I'm afraid you're right. Hezbollah won. They are being glorified throughout the Mid East will undoubtably pick up more seats in the Parliment next election. |
   
Duncan
Supporter Username: Duncanrogers
Post Number: 6900 Registered: 12-2001

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 10:23 am: |
|
Quote:Okay tulip, I thought you were above hiding behind the "party of one" line. Please. You are no different than any other poster here. You know who you have voted for in the past and it doesn't take a genius to figure out who those candidates were. You are just another typical northeast lib who believes you are so much smarter than everyone. Your unique spin to set yourself apart is the party of one crap. I don't buy it and I know you don't buy it.
How autobiographical Southerner. Same boring bullshi*t of the tone "we won" and "you lost" If you are so dense as to not understand that two people with extremely differeing opinions on major issues can vote for the same person than you are right where you belong, in the slop trough.
|
   
Tom Reingold
Supporter Username: Noglider
Post Number: 15325 Registered: 1-2003

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 10:32 am: |
|
Not only that, Duncan, but I infer from what Southerner says that he believes that the summary of one's views is one's voting record.
|
   
Nohero
Supporter Username: Nohero
Post Number: 5736 Registered: 10-1999

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 10:36 am: |
|
Didn't take long to find this - Southerner in December of 2004:
Quote:From my poliitical point of view the labels of Democrat/Republican don't mean a whole lot. As I stated before I am fiscally conservative and although conservative on the vast majority of social issues I do support certain socially liberal ideas such as gay civil unions (note: I don't support the term of gay marriage).
http://www.southorangevillage.com/cgi-bin/show.cgi?tpc=99059&post=319449#POST319 449 Sounds like a "party of one" kind of guy. |
   
steel
Citizen Username: Steel
Post Number: 1102 Registered: 2-2002
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 10:44 am: |
|
Is the lastest conflict really "over"? From the Washington Post: "Hezbollah refused to disarm and withdraw its fighters from the battle-scarred hills along the border with Israel on Tuesday, threatening to delay deployment of the Lebanese army and endangering a fragile cease-fire. Hezbollah indicated it would be willing to pull back its fighters and weapons in exchange for a promise from the [Lebanese] army not to probe TOO carefully for underground bunkers and weapons caches, the officials said." -Not to probe TOO carefully!? Meanwhile, "UNITED NATIONS (CNN) -- Israel's forces will not leave Lebanon until a U.N.-led multinational force arrives, "even if it takes months," Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Dan Halutz said Wednesday. |
   
Paul Surovell
Supporter Username: Paulsurovell
Post Number: 720 Registered: 2-2003
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 11:34 am: |
|
Does this constitute a threat of offensive military action and thus a violation of the cease-fire resolution? Quote:Yedioth Ahronoth 8-14-06 PM: We’ll continue to hunt Hizbullah down Olmert tells Knesset ‘in every altercation with Hizbullah the IDF soldiers had the upper hand. Hizbullah leaders went into hiding and are lying. We will continue to hunt them down anytime, anywhere’
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3291134,00.html
|
   
Gordon Agress
Citizen Username: Odd
Post Number: 514 Registered: 8-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 12:00 pm: |
|
Never too early to begin working on the case for moral equivalence, eh Paul? Tell me this. Should Hezbollah disarm? If it doesn't disarm, what should the Lebanese do? The "international community"? If the Lebanese and the "international community" don't do that, what should Israel do?
|
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3732 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 12:22 pm: |
|
Paul, if that said Quote:Prez: We’ll continue to hunt al Queda down President Kerry tells Congress ‘in every altercation with al Queda US soldiers had the upper hand. Al Queda leaders went into hiding and are lying. We will continue to hunt them down anytime, anywhere’
Would you have a problem with it? |
   
Gordon Agress
Citizen Username: Odd
Post Number: 519 Registered: 8-2004
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 2:41 pm: |
|
Quote: Hezbollah Balks At Withdrawal From the South Lebanese Officials Work on Compromise By Edward Cody and Doug Struck Washington Post Foreign Service Wednesday, August 16, 2006; Page A01 BEIRUT, Aug. 15 -- Hezbollah refused to disarm and withdraw its fighters from the battle-scarred hills along the border with Israel on Tuesday, threatening to delay deployment of the Lebanese army and endangering a fragile cease-fire. The makings of a compromise emerged from all-day meetings in Beirut, according to senior officials involved in the negotiations, and Prime Minister Fouad Siniora scheduled a cabinet session Wednesday for what he hoped would be formal approval of the deal. Hezbollah indicated it would be willing to pull back its fighters and weapons in exchange for a promise from the army not to probe too carefully for underground bunkers and weapons caches, the officials said. . . . . The Israeli military said it would begin handing over its positions in Lebanon to UNIFIL officers before the end of the week. A UNIFIL spokesman, Milos Strugar, said U.N. observers reported no significant Israeli withdrawals along the border on the second day of the cease-fire. Israel television, however, showed troops walking and riding military vehicles back into Israel and dozens of tanks taking up positions on the Israeli side of the border. "We are hoping the last IDF soldiers will cross the border in a matter of days," Maj. Jonathan Davis of the Israel Defense Forces said in an interview near the border. "We want to do it as quickly and swiftly as possible. As soon as UNIFIL and the Lebanese army are ready to assume responsibility in the area, which we hope is as soon as possible, we will leave."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/15/AR2006081500322. html Paul?
|
   
dave23
Citizen Username: Dave23
Post Number: 1953 Registered: 5-2001
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 2:51 pm: |
|
It's going to be awfully tough to disarm Hezbollah once they become the official government of Lebanon. |
   
Spanish Inquisitor
Citizen Username: Sinq
Post Number: 83 Registered: 4-2004

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 2:53 pm: |
|
Which Israel is helping them achieve. |
   
Rastro
Citizen Username: Rastro
Post Number: 3737 Registered: 5-2004

| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 3:41 pm: |
|
Sinq, though I doubt it is Israel's intention, it WOULD make fighting Hezbollah much easier. If they are the official government of Lebanon, then there are fewer uninvolved parties. Right now, the government of Lebanon can reasonably claim they are an uninvolved party. But if Hezbollah becomes the government, that would be a tough claim to back up. Once that happens, it becomes a war between Israel and Lebanon, not a war between Israel and an "unaffiliated" third party. |
   
Factvsfiction
Citizen Username: Factvsfiction
Post Number: 1453 Registered: 4-2006
| Posted on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 - 4:40 pm: |
|
Middle East neophytes....
 |