Archive through December 23, 2003 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

M-SO Message Board » Soapbox » Archive through January 6, 2004 » US terror threat raised » Archive through December 23, 2003 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Addy
Citizen
Username: Addy

Post Number: 4
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 4:10 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

ta
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenney
Citizen
Username: Kenney

Post Number: 209
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 4:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Since it seems it was too much to expect for you to click on the link i provided, here is some more info....


From Presidents Bush budget:

The President has sustained large increases in military pay, and ensured that military compensation remains competitive. In 2002, President Bush proposed, and the Congress approved, the largest military pay raise in 20 years. This raise included an across-the-board increase of 4.6 percent, plus additional targeted raises for certain experienced personnel. Total pay raises averaged 6.9 percent. For 2003, the President proposed and the Congress approved a military pay raise of 4.7 percent—including an across-the-board pay raise of 4.1 percent and further targeted raises averaging 0.6 percent. The President’s 2003 Budget also proposed, and the Congress approved, up to $1,500 monthly, on top of base salary, to personnel accepting certain hard-to-fill assignments.

The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today..FDR..
Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth...G.W.
Everyone wants a voice in human freedom. There's a fire burning inside of all us...L.W.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Citizen
Username: Nohero

Post Number: 2599
Registered: 10-1999


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 4:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Today's Threat Level
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1697
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oh, man, what's next??
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

sbenois
Citizen
Username: Sbenois

Post Number: 10536
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dearest Nohero,

I wouldn't worry about the latest information that Tom posted. After all, it's a big freaking joke, isn't it?

I mean why worry as long as Cookie Monster and Ernie, those lovable muppets, are looking after us.

When an airliner crashes into a convention center or some asshole drops a dirty bomb in Times Square at midnight on New Year's Eve, I'm sure you'll be tickling yourself with just how silly it is that the government even bothered to caution us.

Oh how funny it all is.

Isn't it?


---> Brought to you by Sbenois Engineering LLC <-
Hey, it also wouldn’t look good coming out of a motel with your wife’s best friend saying you were just planning a surprise birthday party for her husband...- Arturo November '03
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

1-2many
Citizen
Username: Wbg69

Post Number: 766
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:19 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

so what's your point, sbenois: that the gov't is buying itself an "I told you so"? are we just supposed to shelter in place now? how about, instead of laying the blame and responsibility on Joe and Jane America, the gov't takes a look at the foreign policy that has earned US international hatred in the first place.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

sbenois
Citizen
Username: Sbenois

Post Number: 10537
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:22 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

how about, instead of laying the blame and responsibility on Joe and Jane America, the gov't takes a look at the foreign policy that has earned US international disdain in the first place.




What a load of utter crap.


---> Brought to you by Sbenois Engineering LLC <-
Hey, it also wouldn’t look good coming out of a motel with your wife’s best friend saying you were just planning a surprise birthday party for her husband...- Arturo November '03
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1513
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

We are at risk of being attacked. We always will be, because to an extent, it's up to the bad guys to be good or bad. We can't control the behavior of each person on the planet. This is a part of personal responsibility.

The government can do stuff, and it does, too.

What are we the people supposed to do when the warnings go out? They're not telling us to stay home. So, what do we do? Um, be careful? What the heck does that mean? I think it means be fearful. What a crock. What good is that? FDR said we have nothing to fear but fear itself. Bush wants us to fear everything, because that way, we have an enemy and a constant state of war. Some leadership.

As someone just pointed out, we cannot afford to declare a low level of danger, because that creates a great opportunity for the terrorists.

Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 396
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I'm also glad the govt has decided to give us this "Orange" warning. Now I can protect myself and my family by uh, um, uh, ahhh...

buying duct tape?

Thanks for the heads up Tom.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 397
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:31 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I meant Tom Ridge, not Tom Reingold
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

sbenois
Citizen
Username: Sbenois

Post Number: 10538
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

As someone just pointed out, we cannot afford to declare a low level of danger, because that creates a great opportunity for the terrorists.




Dearest Tom R.,

This is just beautiful. On the one hand you and others believe that these warnings mean nothing and offer you no comfort or direction. Then this gem comes along which clearly, if unwittingly proves that something must be different in the way we act when the alert level is raised because it somehow deters terrorists.

I wish you'd make up your mind on whether there is value or not.


---> Brought to you by Sbenois Engineering LLC <-
Hey, it also wouldn’t look good coming out of a motel with your wife’s best friend saying you were just planning a surprise birthday party for her husband...- Arturo November '03
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 398
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:45 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I guess my issue is with these broadcasts of the color coding warnings to everyone.

my recollection is that a host of terrorist plots were foiled in the days leading up to New Year's Eve 2000 by simply warning law enforcement personnel -- the people who could actually DO something about the threats. why does a grandma in Pocatello need an Orange alert? just so her blood pressure can go up when her kids get on a plane to see her at Christmas?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

sbenois
Citizen
Username: Sbenois

Post Number: 10539
Registered: 10-2001


Posted on Monday, December 22, 2003 - 11:56 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

There are not enough law enforcement people in the United States to DO SOMETHING. They need help. They need us to be a lot more alert (and a lot less snide) when these warnings come.

And yes, they need grandma to worry because maybe grandma, with her eyes wide open, will notice something amiss.




---> Brought to you by Sbenois Engineering LLC <-
Hey, it also wouldn’t look good coming out of a motel with your wife’s best friend saying you were just planning a surprise birthday party for her husband...- Arturo November '03
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bobk
Citizen
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 4118
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 4:46 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Sylad, but you forgot to bring up Monica. No post such as yours is complete without a Monica reference.

With all his faults, and there are many, Clinton would have stayed in Washington during the alert for PR and leadership reasons. He might have set up shop in the bomb shelter in the basement, but he would have stayed in town.

And on a lighter note. Shortly after lunch yesterday there were a series of explosions near the corner of John Street and Water Street. This area is visible from our office and most everybody ran for their lives since almost all of us had been through at least one attack at the World Trade Center. It turned out that the explosions were from a construction accident, but everybody in the area really got their juices flowing.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Citizen
Username: Nohero

Post Number: 2604
Registered: 10-1999


Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 7:16 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dearest Sbenois:

Maybe we're just going about our lives, as requested by government officials from the President on down.

So, like, chill, and have a Happy Festivus.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

bobk
Citizen
Username: Bobk

Post Number: 4120
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 8:29 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

There is a story in today’s NY Times about a kid in Maine who got prosecuted as an adult under Federal Law for torching a boat yard. The justification given by the government is that the boatyard was engaged in interstate commerce, although the tone of the story is that the prosecution was because George I had a $21,000 boat engine destroyed in the fire so this was “terrorism”.

It isn’t my intent to defend the kid. In spite of being an honor student with a clean record he deserved jail time for what he did. However, he has been shipped off to a maximum-security youth facility in Pennsylvania where he is in the mental health wing.

I would also add that the RICO statute that was passed to give law enforcement an additional tool to fight organized crime is regularly used in routine B to B lawsuits. Those triple damages sure are attractive!!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1514
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 8:43 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes, regular people can help law enforcement. Maybe we should be in the habit of looking for and reporting suspicious behavior. That habit should be active at any official level of danger. If Grandma is waiting at home for her family to arrive, it does no good at all for her to worry a bit extra. It doesn't get them there more safely. There is a cost to worry. Are we forgetting that?
Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Charles "Chuck" Howley
Citizen
Username: Cowboy

Post Number: 203
Registered: 9-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 8:53 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I cannot help but address with some of the casual comments posted on this thread.

Dave, at some point earlier on this thread you stated that you, “have yet to establish a connection between The Weekly Standard and journalistic integrity.” Please provide us with specific examples(proof) of where “The Weekly Standard” has shown itself to be unworthy of “journalistic integrity.” Or does this simply lend additional credence to what Kenny correctly terms, “if the facts dont back up your memory(hope), ignore them and go on the offensive.”


Dr. WOB, “why does a grandma in Pocatello need an Orange alert? just so her blood pressure can go up when her kids get on a plane to see her at Christmas?”Do you honestly think it was Tom Ridge’s desire to upgrade the terror threat during this holiday season? I seriously doubt that this came about casually as you may suggest. This is serious stuff and lives are at stake.


Bobk, you mention “Clinton would have stayed in Washington during the alert for PR and leadership reasons.” Would that make a difference? Do you mean to suggest that you would feel better if Bush if he stayed in Washington? Would you then consider voting for him? How fickle, and telling.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

lumpyhead
Citizen
Username: Lumpyhead

Post Number: 583
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 9:06 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dammed if you do and dammed if you don't. Maybe the public can make an informed decision about "flying" to see Grandma or "going" to Times Square on New Years Eve. I certainly appreciate that information if I was planning a trip. You all would be the first on line to sue the government for not alerting you in the event that something did happen.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 399
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Tuesday, December 23, 2003 - 9:12 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

no "Chuck," I don't think Tom Ridge picked the holiday season specifically for an alert. He's given us plenty of other warnings over the past two years.

But I'm with Tom Reingold - there is a price to getting 270 million Americans riled up without giving them a precise idea of what they should do to protect themselves. Let's look at the current alert: planes and dirty bombs. Are we supposed to stop flying? No, they tell us to keep to our plans. Am I supposed to carry a Geiger counter to detect dangerous radiation?

And that's the absurdity of these alerts. Sure as LH says they're letting us make informed decisions. But the information is conflicting. Ridge tells us the alert is now Orange, but also tells us air travel has never been safer. Huh?

And I disagree that there aren't enough law enforcement personnel to do this job. There are hundreds of thousands of trained professionals across the country - 60 or so in Maplewood alone if I'm not mistaken.

Instead we're arming regular joes with vague information so they can send law enforcement off on wild goose chases like shutting down highways because a couple of Middle Eastern men decide to visit a Shoney's.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration