Author |
Message |
   
themp
Citizen Username: Themp
Post Number: 366 Registered: 12-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:06 pm: |    |
Also bear in mind that the policy decision made after the second world war to spend huge amounts of public money on an elaborate highway system means that you can't look at any of this through an exclusively freemarket lens. We committed ourselves to a public policy that has made our economy strong, and we finance a lot of the road stuff through taxes that hit everyone, rather than through user fees. Real freemarket types will argue that we should have privately owned toll roads, but we would have a crap third world economy if we did. Imagine how much we spend tax-wise on highway safety, state troopers, check points, cop cars, etc? If I don't drive can I get my share back? I don't think so. So the government should have a say in making this public arena safe and having it pollute as little as reasonably possible net. |
   
Tom Reingold
Citizen Username: Noglider
Post Number: 1701 Registered: 1-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:12 pm: |    |
Yeah, why do we use those words that way? I think we should say "drive a bicycle" and "ride a car" but we have it backwards. Tom Reingold the prissy-pants There is nothing
|
   
Marvin Gardens
Citizen Username: Marvin_gardens
Post Number: 54 Registered: 11-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:31 pm: |    |
If people didn't want these stupid cars, no one would make them Yeah, but people don't know what's good for them which is why they put warning labels on products and just because people want something doesn't mean they should be able to have it. You are safer in an SUV You may be safer inside one, providing that you don't roll over but not if one crashes into your fuel efficient compact. So, until everyone has an SUV they are dangerous. People are idiots. Statistics show that the more educated parents have less children. It's true. And the less educated have more children, so slowly but surely the world is being overpopulated with morons who all want SUV's. _______________ Do Not Pass Go |
   
Cato Nova
Citizen Username: Cato_nova
Post Number: 28 Registered: 12-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:38 pm: |    |
Marvin Gardens: There is a book called a dictionary. Look under the letter "C" and you can examine the entries for "correlation" and "causation." It might prove an interesting experience for you. |
   
Betty Crock
Citizen Username: Mem
Post Number: 2607 Registered: 5-2001

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:44 pm: |    |
Lumpyhead, If you would like to refine your "primitive" style of art, I am giving private art lessons. Apparently, this themp character thinks we're the same poster, but, should "we" care what she thinks?
 |
   
newone
Citizen Username: Newone
Post Number: 113 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:46 pm: |    |
Again, stop classifying ALL people who drive SUVs as morons. Yes, some are but a lot are not. Just as not all people who drive Porsches or Corvettes or any sports car are "reckless speed demons." |
   
Cato Nova
Citizen Username: Cato_nova
Post Number: 29 Registered: 12-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:59 pm: |    |
Why are people so reluctant to face the truth? If you drive an SUV, it means that you value your own (incorrectly) perceived safety as worth more than the safety than others and the well-being of this petroleum addicted nation. An SUV is an affront to all the brave men and women in Iraq who are dying everyday so that SUV owners can keep on their selfish ways. Someone who says "aint personal choice great" is a person who disregards the social cost of their actions. In short, a pig. |
   
ligeti
Citizen Username: Ligeti
Post Number: 46 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 1:01 pm: |    |
Cato, Newone - Read "Road Killers" in the current issue of The New Yorker. It's not about whether SUV drivers are better off in a collision than sedan owners...it's the way they start driving because of the artificial sense (read: self absorption) of security they feel. And btw, research in the same article points to clear evidence that SUVs are far more dangerous to the driver in rollovers compared to other vehicles, including minivans. This is because the manufacturers are held to significantly relaxed saftey standards because SUVs are defined as trucks instead of cars. |
   
Marvin Gardens
Citizen Username: Marvin_gardens
Post Number: 55 Registered: 11-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 1:07 pm: |    |
Cato please, the grown ups are talking _______________ Do Not Pass Go |
   
newone
Citizen Username: Newone
Post Number: 114 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 1:13 pm: |    |
Cato OK, so they're fighting only for us SUV drivers. Thanks for the clarification - I thought we were there for other reasons. Since you know what other's are thinking do you know what I'm thinking now? Calling me a pig, how brilliant and intelligent - good argument. ESBAM |
   
sportsnut
Citizen Username: Sportsnut
Post Number: 843 Registered: 10-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 2:28 pm: |    |
Of all the reasons I purchased our SUV, my safety was the least of them. Having driven rear wheel drive sports cars (the only true kind) for nearly my entire adult life, I can honestly say that I am not one of the people who feels safer in an SUV. So since I didn't purchase one to feel safer (read: to be self absorbed), and I really don't care that much about the price of gas (yes it should be more expensive, especially here in NJ) I obviously haven't bought into the marketing hype could it be......omigod....I wanted one. Your argument about buying into the marketing hype would be valid in cases where people decided to purchase a vehicle and without driving any other type decide (solely based upon advertisements) to purchase an SUV. But since most SUV owners are probably on their second or third could it be that they have tried other vehicles and just simply aren't satisfied with them?
|
   
Tom Reingold
Citizen Username: Noglider
Post Number: 1706 Registered: 1-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 2:35 pm: |    |
I think we are all influenced by marketing. The differences among us is that we are influenced by different factions. Some of it is political. But no one is immune. Still, calling SUV owners morons or pigs is really off the deep end. That's labeling someone because you don't agree with his particular flavor of materialism. How shallow that is! Tom Reingold the prissy-pants There is nothing
|
   
curb
Citizen Username: Curb
Post Number: 366 Registered: 1-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 2:46 pm: |    |
Cato, Why don`t you just move your sorry ass to another country then? I don`t want to see you having to hang around a bunch of piggish Americans that the rest of the world hates. Don`t let the door hit you in the ass on your way out. Better yet, let it hit you in the ass, and keep walking.
|
   
themp
Citizen Username: Themp
Post Number: 372 Registered: 12-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 2:52 pm: |    |
Go to France! |
   
Crazyguggenheim
Citizen Username: Crazyguggenheim
Post Number: 498 Registered: 2-2002

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 3:48 pm: |    |
I drive a '77 Malibu! Call me crazy |
   
Marvin Gardens
Citizen Username: Marvin_gardens
Post Number: 56 Registered: 11-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 4:00 pm: |    |
If it's an Americans god given right to drive an SUV because they "want" to, then I have just as much right to refer to them as morons. Isn't that what our boys are dying for? So, the people back home can do what they "want' ? Isn't that America? Instant gratification, to hell with the other guy, to hell with the environment, if someone wants it they can have it no matter if it impacts others negatively. Screw them, I want it. It's a good thing god is on our side, nobody else is. _______________ Do Not Pass Go |
   
newone
Citizen Username: Newone
Post Number: 115 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 4:31 pm: |    |
I didn't know there was an amendment in the Constitution for "the right to drive an SUV." True, you do have the right to your opinion as I do mine - that is what's great about this country - no matter how wrong you are (In case you weren't sure that last was a joke)
|
   
Habanero2
Citizen Username: Habanero2
Post Number: 21 Registered: 12-2003
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 4:33 pm: |    |
Marvin, How much stuff can you carry back from Home Depot on your gas free scooter? Oh, wait, let me guess, you drive some form of gas powered vehicle, just not an SUV because Ralph Nader says those are for yuppies. I get it. "You kids today have it easy. When I was a kid everything was HUGE. My dad was nearly four times bigger than me. You couldn't even see the tops of counters.... Then gradually everything became smaller until it was the manageable size it is today." |
   
Marvin Gardens
Citizen Username: Marvin_gardens
Post Number: 57 Registered: 11-2003

| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 5:14 pm: |    |
You bought an SUV to carry things home from Home Depot??? God help us _______________ Do Not Pass Go |
   
anon
Citizen Username: Anon
Post Number: 919 Registered: 6-2002
| Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 7:00 pm: |    |
I suppose this is an interesting discussion but I have been unable to focus because I can't get the image of the "young tart" out of my mind.  |