Archive through December 2, 2003 Log Out | Lost Password? | Topics | Search
Contact | Register | My Profile | SO home | MOL home

M-SO Message Board » 2003 Attic » Soapbox » Archive through December 4, 2003 » Liberals finding their voice » Archive through December 2, 2003 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1227
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 3:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=676&e=11&u=/usatoday/12043608
Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 497
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 3:43 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The left has always had their voice in major broadcast TV networks and the newspapers (I'm talking about editorial content winding up in news stories on the front page). It's just not selling now, nor has it been for a while as you see TV audiences shrinking and at best flat newspaper circulations. All this activity is interesting against a backdrop of people supposedly being cowed by a wartime president.

As for talk radio, so far I've seen liberals buying stations rather than having the programming and talent garner audiences sheerly by virtue of attracting people to it as was done with talk radio as we know it today. Looks like NPR with an eye towards selling ads. The demand side isn't there for liberal talk radio. Not that that was the model for conservative talk -- for it to be conservative per se -- but there was a built-in market for conservative talk because the rest of the media was biased to the left. That fueled part of it's rise, but by no means all of it. There's a little thing called talent -- and many untalented conservative radio hosts have fallen by the wayside.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1228
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 3:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Actually, I disagree that mainstream media are left-slanted. True, journalists tend to be leftists, but editors and publishers tend to be right-slanted, and the result is fairly balanced.

I think the reason the leftists don't "sell" as well is that the rightwing radio hosts etc. appeal to base emotions such as hate and fear. The leftists are generally more intellectual, which makes people's brains hurt. Substance is more boring and requires an attention span.
Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

strawberry
Citizen
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 1500
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 4:03 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

left winged radio hosts don't sell because most Americans don't care to hear pissing and moaning on a daily basis.
"That moment has directly affected my foreign policy. See, it changed the nature of the presidency. It changed the security arrangements of the United States of America. I vowed to the American people I would never forget the lessons of September the 11th, 2001."
--President George W. Bush
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

algebra2
Citizen
Username: Algebra2

Post Number: 1455
Registered: 5-2001


Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 4:15 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I hear pissing and moaning on a daily basis -- you just learn to tune it out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenney
Citizen
Username: Kenney

Post Number: 120
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 4:17 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tom and Straw, funny comments(I assume you both were being funny)
to all my thoughts, add to the end:

or not.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1583
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 4:59 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I thought that's what Rush and O'Reilly did all day -- piss and moan -- about liberals. Do they have a positive message after all?

Conservatism's start is descending. Watch for Tom D. to blow the opportunity that the convention in NYC offers, Bush to melt down in the debates (unless he chickens out).

Word for the day: hubris
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kenney
Citizen
Username: Kenney

Post Number: 122
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 5:14 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

another angry donkey...
to all my thoughts, add to the end:

or not.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1587
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 5:44 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

love this, from Rush's own site today:


quote:

Somebody wanted to know if I was a hypocrite about my use of painkillers and the fact that it was wrong or that I have ostensibly said in the past that people who use drugs ought to be punished for it.

And my answer was, no, it's not hypocritical because my behavior doesn't determine the value of right and wrong. Nobody's does. I mean right and wrong, there are absolutes of right and wrong. And there are people who waver from right and do wrong, and I'm one of them. We all are. Various stages, various levels. It doesn't change what right and wrong are.




There. Hypocrisy has been defined out of existence.


quote:

I do think that that's what this is primarily all about which is why I am not going to admit to being hypocritical about anything here, because if I were to admit that I'm a hypocrite, then I'm going to be disqualified from being able to say what I think is right and wrong. I'm not going to give that up. I'm not going to let anybody take that away from me, so that's my answer to this.




Brilliant. He's not a hypocrite because if he was he wouldn't be able to be one. I think. The whole thing is a bit tautological. What does this have to do with pissing and moaning? Right smack in the middle of this whole deal about his drug use is:


quote:

Let's go back to the Clinton inaugural. This is one of the greatest examples that we can cite.




THIS IS THE BEST. WHATEVER happens bad IT HAS TO DO WITH CLINTON!

The guy's a genius. [read it here]
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

strawberry
Citizen
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 1502
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 6:57 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The bottom line is whatever problems Rush has, they pale in comparison to the President of the United States having sex with an intern in the oval office and than lying to a nation about it.

Rush is NOT an elected official. He's an entertainer just like Howard Stern and Imus and Mike and the Mad dog. There's a serious difference.
"That moment has directly affected my foreign policy. See, it changed the nature of the presidency. It changed the security arrangements of the United States of America. I vowed to the American people I would never forget the lessons of September the 11th, 2001."
--President George W. Bush
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1229
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 7:00 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

tom, I take that quote of Rush's to mean that if he admitted being a hypocrit, he'd give up the stage for saying what's right and wrong about what others say. He has a point there, though it doesn't make him look any better.
Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

tom
Citizen
Username: Tom

Post Number: 1589
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 11:47 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

but then he turns it around and uses it as proof that he's not. Circular logic.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1232
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Monday, December 1, 2003 - 11:50 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

He really does know what he's doing. His fans need someone to admire. He shouldn't let them down. It's not about building character, it's about faith in their object of admiration.
Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 499
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 11:57 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Tom -- liberals aren't intellectual by a long shot. All you have to do is care and not worry about the efficacy of your policies. The Great Society, Social Security, the Medicare cost explosion -- they're collapsing. Liberals never wanted to give away the secret of what actually is a spending 'cut' in DC -- conservatives did that. Liberals never want to talk about tax policy as a means of revenue for the Treasury and maximizing returns -- they link it to spending (which is an entirely different discipline) and social engineering winners and losers -- but they can't intellectually and HONESTLY say what they're doing because they lose elections every time they do. You can't delve into specifics when your equation is 2+2=5. Anyone can see that doesn't make sense or violates American principles -- whether you're from a failed public school or a private one that all the elites send their kids to.

Hate and fear? Gephardt is peddling fear right now in that we haven't financed Homeland Security enough. Hate? That's what class envy is based in. Intellectual? What's the Dem fix for Medicare and Social Security -- just spend MORE and 'save it.' Wait....too fast for me...so a little slower.

As for optimism -- conservatives regularly trumpet the abilities and accomplishments of individual citizens, overcoming great odds without demanding someone else pay for their situation (read: govt). Dems use group politics with a heavy dose of victimology.

Fear? What else is Global Warming/Sky is Falling?

As for Rush Limbaugh being a hypocrit, he'd have to come out and renounce everything he said and stood for on the drug issue and what is right and wrong. He'd have to blame society, or racism, or someone or something else and absolve himself of responsibility like........some people have in much higher positions of power (we'll leave it at that). He'd have to say whatever the courts say is his punishment is unfair. He hasn't done that. When he does, you'll have a case. Until then, you can only hope he does and that things go badly for him (see: category of 'hate').
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Nohero
Citizen
Username: Nohero

Post Number: 2496
Registered: 10-1999


Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 12:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

There's only one reason why conservative radio succeeds, and liberal radio won't - the ratings are driven by angry listeners.

Conservatives want to listen to someone who agrees with them, and then they get angry at whoever the host is attacking. Liberals are only happy if they can get angry at someone who disagrees with them, and so don't want to listen to someone they already agree with.

You know I'm right about this one ...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

strawberry
Citizen
Username: Strawberry

Post Number: 1509
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 12:10 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

People don't want to hear pissing and moaning. That's why liberal talk radio fails.
"That moment has directly affected my foreign policy. See, it changed the nature of the presidency. It changed the security arrangements of the United States of America. I vowed to the American people I would never forget the lessons of September the 11th, 2001."
--President George W. Bush
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 500
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 1:08 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Nohero....conservatives' ire is there before some host brings up anyone specifically. And conservative hosts get disagreed with by their listeners all the time.

Liberal radio fails because it's ideology has failed everywhere it's practised.

Conservatives see the glass as half full, liberals as half empty -- so who's angry?

And dems didn't know Gore was the VP until he ran for president. But that's not a bad thing...liberals need an uninformed following to succeed. Just look at the black 90% lock-step following of a party that promises to fix things and they're still miserable year after year after year.

....go on the streets of NY and ask man on the street questions. You know I'm right about this one. If you don't get there much -- go to Newark.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dr. Winston O'Boogie
Citizen
Username: Casey

Post Number: 316
Registered: 8-2003


Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 1:36 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


quote:

Nohero....conservatives' ire is there before some host brings up anyone specifically.




and,

quote:

Conservatives see the glass as half full, liberals as half empty -- so who's angry?




who's angry? conservatives. you said so yourself three sentences earlier.

(sometimes I think you guys don't even listen to your own arguments)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

cjc
Citizen
Username: Cjc

Post Number: 503
Registered: 8-2003
Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 1:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You're right. Should have said 'consternation.' Sorry -- my ears are still ringing from the Hate Bush Rally.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom Reingold the prissy-pants
Citizen
Username: Noglider

Post Number: 1247
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 - 1:39 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post    Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My ideology is bigger than yours. Nyah nyah nyah. So there.

Tom Reingold
There is nothing

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | User List | Help/Instructions | Credits Administration